SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Successful students selection with fuzzy analytical hierarchy process: the case of the faculty of economics and administrative sciences, ege university

Bulanık analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile başarılı öğrenci seçimi: Ege Üniversitesi iktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültesi örneği

Ayşe KARAÇİZMELİ
Ural ÇİÇEKLİ GÖKAY
Pages
71–94
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this framework, these criteria construct a model with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, the success level of university student is just determined by average grade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is determining the most successful student and using more criteria to measure their success, instead of measuring success just by exam grade.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this framework, these criteria construct a model with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays, the success level of university student is just determined by average grade. The aim of this study is determining the most successful student and using more criteria to measure their success, instead of measuring success just by exam grade. In this framework, these criteria construct a model with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.

Özet

Günümüzde, üniversite öğrencilerinin başarı seviyesine sadece genel not ortalaması ile karar verilmektedir. Bu çalışmayla, öğrencilerin başarısının sadece sınavlarda aldıkları notlarla ölçülmesinin yerine başarı ölçümünde daha fazla kriterin kullanılması ve en başarılı olan öğrenci/öğrencilerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, belirlenen kriterler kullanılarak bulanık analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile bir model oluşturulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAÇİZMELİ, A., GÖKAY, U. Ç. (2022). Successful students selection with fuzzy analytical hierarchy process: the case of the faculty of economics and administrative sciences, ege university. EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 71–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/495941

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aghataher, R., Delavar, M.R., Nami, M.H. ve Samnay, N. (2008): “A Fuzzy-AHP Decision Support System For Evaluation Of Cities Vulnerability Against Earthquakes”, World Applied Sciences Journal, 3: 66-72.
  2. Akman, G. ve Alkan, A. (2006): “Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bulanık AHP Yöntemi Kullanılarak Tedarikçilerin Performansının Ölçülmesi: Otomotiv Yan Sanayiinde Bir Uygulama”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(9): 23-46.
  3. Bali, Ö. ve Gencer, C. (2005): “AHP, Bulanık AHP Ve Bulanık Mantıkla Kara Harp Okuluna Öğretim Elemanı Seçimi”, Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 24-43.
  4. Başlıgil, H. (2005): “The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process For Software Selection Problems”, Journal Of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 23(3): 24-33.
  5. Braxton, J. M., ve Hirschy, A. S. (2004): “Reconceptualizing Antecedents Of Social Integration in Student Departure”. İçinde York, M & Longden, B., “Retention And Student Success In Higher Education”, 89–102. Berkshire, England, Open University Press.
  6. Brockman, M.S. ve Russell, S.T. (2009): “Academic Success”, Building Partnerships for Youth, Ulusal 4-H Konseyi ve Arizona Üniversitesi http://Cals-F.Calsnet.Arizona.Edu/Fcs/Bpy/Content.Cfm? Content=Academic_Success, Erişim: 22.12 2011.
  7. Buckley, J.J. (1985): “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis”, Fuzzy Sets And Systems, 17(3): 233-247.
  8. Chang, D.Y. (1996): “Applications Of The Extent Analysis Method On Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal Of Operational Research, 95(3): 649-655.
  9. Chang, M.J., Denson, N., Saenz, V. ve Misa, K. (2006): “The Educational Benefits of Sustaining Cross-Racial Interaction among Undergraduates”, 77(3): 430-455.
  10. Chen, S. ve Fan, J. (2011): “Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility Based On A Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process”, I.J.Computer Network And Information Security, 5: 13-22.
  11. Cheng, C.H. (1997): “Evaluating Naval Tactical Missile Systems By Fuzzy AHP Based On The Grade Value Of Membership Function”, European Journal Of Operational Research, 96(2): 343-350.
  12. Cheng, C.H. ve Mon, D.L., “Evaluating Weapon System By Analytical Hierarchy Process Based On Fuzzy Scales”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 63(1): 1-10.
  13. Cheng, C.H., Yang, K.L. ve Hwang, C.H. (1999): “Evaluating Attack Helicopters By AHP Based on Linguistic Variable Weight”, European Journal Of Operational Research, 116(2): 423-435.
  14. Clemen, R.T. (1991): Making Hard Decisions, 3. Baskı,
  15. Duxbury Press, California. Cuesta Koleji, http://Academic.Cuesta.Edu/Acasupp/As/200index.htm, Erişim: 22.12.2011 Demirt