SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

POSTCOLONIAL THEORY DECOLONIZING INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE

POSTKOLONYAL KURAM ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER DİSİPLİNİNİDEKOLONİZE ETMEK

Elem TEPECİKLİOĞLU EYRİCE
Pages
80–97
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main hypothesis of the article is that the still-evolvingpostcolonial theory presents a strong critical standpoint to mainstream International Relations theories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Postcolonial theory is a postpositivist/reflectivist/interpretative/constitutive and non-mainstreamInternational Relations theory which claims to provide a critical thinking to dominant rationalist/positivisttradition within the International Relations discipline.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article evaluates the postcolonial theory withinthe frame of its origins, its major products and its main criticism to other International Relations theorieswhile considering the development of the theory through the history of International Relations discipline.The article also aims to contribute to the understanding of postcolonial literature and to the Turkishterminology on the postcolonial theory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main hypothesis of the article is that the still-evolvingpostcolonial theory presents a strong critical standpoint to mainstream International Relations theories.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Postcolonial theory is a postpositivist/reflectivist/interpretative/constitutive and non-mainstreamInternational Relations theory which claims to provide a critical thinking to dominant rationalist/positivisttradition within the International Relations discipline. This article evaluates the postcolonial theory withinthe frame of its origins, its major products and its main criticism to other International Relations theorieswhile considering the development of the theory through the history of International Relations discipline.The article also aims to contribute to the understanding of postcolonial literature and to the Turkishterminology on the postcolonial theory. The main hypothesis of the article is that the still-evolvingpostcolonial theory presents a strong critical standpoint to mainstream International Relations theories.

Özet

Postkolonyal kuram, Uluslararası İlişkiler (Uİ) disiplininde uzun yıllar hâkim olmuş rasyonalist/pozitivistgeleneğin temel savlarına eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla karşı çıkma iddiasında bulunan ve sahip olduğuyöntembilimsel (metodolojik)/epistemolojik duruşa bağlı olarakpostpozitivist/reflektivist/yorumsamacı/yapısal olarak nitelendirilebilecek, ana akım olmayan birUluslararası İlişkiler kuramıdır. Bu makale, postkolonyal kuramı, Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin tarihi akışıiçindeki gelişimini göz önünde bulundurarak; kökleri, verdiği temel eserler ve mevcut Uluslararası İlişkilerkuramlarına getirdiği eleştiriler çerçevesinde değerlendirmeyi ve böylelikle post kolonyal kurama aityazının ve Türkçe terminolojinin daha iyi bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamayı amaçlamıştır. Makale, gelişimidevam eden postkolonyal kuramın, ana akım Uluslararası İlişkiler kuramlarına yönelik güçlü bir eleştirelbakış açısı sunmakta olduğunu iddia etmektedir (1)

🔖

Cite This Article

EYRİCE, E. T. (2022). POSTCOLONIAL THEORY DECOLONIZING INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE. EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 80–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/495938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acharya, A.(2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58(2):239-275.
  2. Acharya, A. ve Buzan, B (2007). Why There is no non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pasific, 7(3): 287-312
  3. Adler, E.(19979. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations. 3(3): 319-363
  4. Agathangelou, A.M. ve Ling, L.H.M. (2009). Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds. Routledge. Ahluwalia, P.(2001). Politics and Post-Colonial Theory: African Inflections, Routledge: London and New York. Anghie, A.(2006). Decolonizing the Concept of ‘Good Governance (ss.109-130). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der), Decolonizing International Relations, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,
  5. Inc. Ashcroft, B. ve diğerleri. (1998). Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies, London and New York: Routledge. Ashcroft, B. ve diğerleri. (2002).
  6. The Empire Writes Back, London and New York: Routledge. Ashcroft, B. ve diğerleri. (2003).
  7. The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, USA and Canada: Routledge. Bhabba, H.K. (1996). The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination and the Discourse of Colonialism (ss. 87-106).
  8. Houston A. Baker, Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg (der.), Black British Cultural Studies: a Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1996.
  9. Bhabba, H.K.(1996). Unpacking my Library Again. (ss. 199-211). Iain Chambers ve Lidia 1996, Curti (der.), The Post- Colonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons. London and New York: Routledge. Bhabba, H.K. (1994).
  10. The Location of Culture, London and New York: Routledge. Bianca, I. (2008). Contested Nationalities and Postcolonial IR theory: The Aprés Coup as an Approach to Historical Injustice. 26 Mart 2008, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA’s 49th Annual Convention, Bridging Multiple Divides, Hilton San Francisco, USA, _____http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p252044_index.html> (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Kasım 2009).
  11. Bilgin, P.(2008). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR?, Third World Quarterly, 29(1): 5-23.
  12. Booth, K. (1995). Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs. 71(1):103-126
  13. Carby, H.V, (1996). White Women Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood. (ss. 61-86).
  14. Houston A. Baker, Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg (der.), Black British Cultural Studies: a Reader, Chicago: University of Chicago. Césaire, A