SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Comparing the Financial Performance of Banks in Turkey By Using Promethee Method

Füsun GÖKALP
Pages
63–82
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But for 2009-2012 period state-owned banks went down to the last position whereas the foreign banks went up to first position.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aims to compare the financial performance of state-owned banks, private banks and foreign banks in Turkey for pre-crisis and post-crisis period by using the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, banks are analyzed between 2006 and 2012 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But for 2009-2012 period state-owned banks went down to the last position whereas the foreign banks went up to first position.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Banks · Financial Performance · Financial ratios

Abstract

The present study aims to compare the financial performance of state-owned banks, private banks and foreign banks in Turkey for pre-crisis and post-crisis period by using the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) method. In the study, banks are analyzed between 2006 and 2012 years. In order to determine the effects of the recent financial crisis time period is divided into two: pre-crisis period (2006-2008) and post crisis (2009-2012) periods. In the study 5 main and 12 sub- financial ratios are selected to evaluate the bank performance. The selected ratios are organized into 5 categories (capital, assets, management, earnings and liquidity) in accordance with the CAMEL framework. The deposit banks are ranked based on their financial performance for both before and after the crisis. Research results reveal that state-owned banks were affected significantly by the recent financial crisis. State-owned banks were selected as the best alternative for 2006-2008 period. But for 2009-2012 period state-owned banks went down to the last position whereas the foreign banks went up to first position.

Özet

The present study aims to compare the financial performance of state-owned banks, private banks and foreign banks in Turkey for pre-crisis and post-crisis period by using the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) method. In the study, banks are analyzed between 2006 and 2012 years. In order to determine the effects of the recent financial crisis time period is divided into two: pre-crisis period (2006-2008) and post crisis (2009-2012) periods. In the study 5 main and 12 sub- financial ratios are selected to evaluate the bank performance. The selected ratios are organized into 5 categories (capital, assets, management, earnings and liquidity) in accordance with the CAMEL framework. The deposit banks are ranked based on their financial performance for both before and after the crisis. Research results reveal that state-owned banks were affected significantly by the recent financial crisis. State-owned banks were selected as the best alternative for 2006-2008 period. But for 2009-2012 period state-owned banks went down to the last position whereas the foreign banks went up to first position.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKALP, F. (2022). Comparing the Financial Performance of Banks in Turkey By Using Promethee Method. EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 63–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/495920

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Albayrak, Y. E., Erkut, H (2005) ‘Banka Performans Değerlendirmede Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreç Yaklaşımı ’ İTÜ Dergisi/D Mühendislik, 4, (6): 47-58.
  2. Al-Shemmeri T., Al-Kloub, B., Pearman, A. (1997) ‘Model choice in multicriteria decision aid’, European Journal of Operational Research, 97: 550–560.
  3. Arshadi, N., E.C. Lawrence (1987) ‘An Empirical Investigation of New Bank Performance’ Journal of Banking and Finace, 11: 33-48.
  4. Avkıran (2011) ‘Association of DEA super-effiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case of Chinese bank’ Omegai, 39(3): 323-334
  5. Aysan, A.F. and Ceyhan S.P. (2008) ‘What Determines The Banking Sector Performance in Globalized Financial Markets? The Case of Turkey’ Physica A, 387:1593–1602 The Banks Association of Turkey, www.tbb.org.tr Bayrakdaroğlu, A. and Ege, İ. (2008) ‘Türkiye’deki Bankaların Performansının Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Model Önerisi’ TÜİK- 17. İstatistik Araştırma Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı: 32-49
  6. Bağcı H., Rençber, Ö.F. ‘Kamu Bankaları ve Halka Açık Özel Bankaların Promethee Yöntemi İle Karlılıklarının Analizi’, Aksaray Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 6(1), 39-47
  7. Beaver, W. (1966) ‘Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure’ Journal of Accounting Research, 4: 71- 111, Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2490171
  8. Brans J. P. and Vincke PH. (1985) ‘A Preference Ranking Organisation Method (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making)’ Management Science, 31(6): 647- 656 Cole, R.and Gunther, J. (1995), ‘A CAMEL Rating's Shelf Life’: Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1293504
  9. Cornett M.M., Guo L, Khaksari S., Tehranian H.,’The impact of state ownership on performance differencesin privately-owned versus state-owned banks: An international comparison’, Journal of Financial of Intermediation, 19:74-94.
  10. Çinko, Murat; AVCI, Emin; (2008) ‘CAMELS Derecelendirme Sistemi ve Türk Ticari Bankacılık Sektöründe Başarısızlık Tahmini, Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi’ BDDK, 2(.2): 25–49
  11. Dinç, S., (2005). ‘Politicians and banks: political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets’, J.ournal of Financial Economics, 77:453–479.
  12. Dinçer, Hasan, Görener, Ali (2011) ‘Performans Değerlendirilmesinde AHP_VIKOR – TOPSIS Yaklaşımları: Hizemt Sektöründe Bir Uygulma’ Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Sigma, 29: 244-260
  13. Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. (2009), ‘A Multicriteria Approach to Bank Rating’, European Working Group Multiple Criteria Decision Ai