Journals / EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı:

INNOVATION IN PRODUCTION OR CONSUMPTION? SUSTAINABILITY, MARKET ECONOMY AND EVALUATING TURKISH MARKET ON THE BASE OF INNOVATION

ÜRETİMDE Mİ YOKSA TÜKETİMDE Mİ İNOVASYON? SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK, PAZAR EKONOMİSİ VE İNOVASYON TEMELİNDE TÜRKİYE'NİN PAZAR ORTAMININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
175–190
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study it is also aimed to offer public policy suggestions for innovation ecosystem sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Innovation is appearing as newness which could be commercialized and disseminated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey has taken attention with especially Vision 2013 project in terms of innovation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study it is also aimed to offer public policy suggestions for innovation ecosystem sustainability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Innovation is appearing as newness which could be commercialized and disseminated. Turkey has taken attention with especially Vision 2013 project in terms of innovation. This development especially realized in fast moving electronic goods such as tablet computer, mobile phone which are more visible in the market. However does this situation really reflects a real innovative development? This study aims to evaluate Turkey"s general innovation position with secondary data and to make a distinction between innovation in production and innovation in consumption in fast moving electronic goods market. By this way innovation concept will be evaluated in the scope of consumers and situation analysis will be done in terms of consumers as important sustainability actors. In the study it is also aimed to offer public policy suggestions for innovation ecosystem sustainability.

Özet

İnovasyon ticarileştirilebilen ve yaygınlaştırılabilen yenilik olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Türkiye özellikle Vizyon 2023 projesiyle inovasyon anlamında atılım gerçekleştirmiş ve dikkat çekmiştir. Bu gelişme özellikle pazar ortamında daha görünür olan cep telefonu, tablet bilgisayar gibi hızlı tüketilen elektronik ürünlerde kendini göstermektedir. Ancak bu durum gerçek bir inovatif gelişmeyi göstermekte midir? Bu çalışmada amaçlanan; ikincil verilerle Türkiye"deki hem genel inovasyon durumunu değerlendirmek hem de hızlı tüketilen elektronik ürünler pazarında üretimde ve tüketimde inovasyon ayrımını ortaya koymaktır. Böylece inovasyon kavramı tüketici temeline çekilecek ve sürdürülebilirliğin önemli bir aktörü olan tüketiciler yönünden durum analizi yapılacaktır. Çalışmada ayrıca inovasyon ekosisteminin sürdürülebilmesi için kamu politikalarına yönelik öneriler sunulması da hedeflenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDEOĞLU, A. Ö., ERTEN, E. Ü. (2022). INNOVATION IN PRODUCTION OR CONSUMPTION? SUSTAINABILITY, MARKET ECONOMY AND EVALUATING TURKISH MARKET ON THE BASE OF INNOVATION. EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ, Cilt: 7 - Sayı:, 175–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/495901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Erdal, F. ve Tatoğlu, E. (2002). "Locational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in an Emerging Market Economy: Evidence From Turkey", Multinational Business Review, 10(1). Erkiletlioğlu, H. (2013). Dünyada ve Türkiye'de Ar-Ge Faaliyetleri Raporu, Gktisadi AraGtırmalar Bölümü, Haziran 2013, https://ekonomi.isbank.com.tr/UserFiles/pdf/ar_07_2013.pdf, EriGim: 28.03.2016
  2. Ersöz, F. (2009). "Avrupa Gnovasyon Göstergeleri (EIS) IGığında Türkiye"nin Konumu", İTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1): 3-16.
  3. Fedrigo, D. ve Hontelez, J. (2010). "Sustainable Consumption and Production An Agenda Beyond Sustainable Consumer Procurement", Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(1): 10-12, DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00219.x Goldsmith, R. E. ve Hofacker, C. (1991). "Measuring Consumer Innovativeness", Journa of The Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3): 209-221.
  4. Hagedoorn, J. ve Cloodt, M. (2003). "Measuring Innovative Performance: Is there an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators?", Research Policy, 32: 1365-1379.
  5. Johannessen, J. A.; Olsen, B. ve Lumpki, G.T. (2001). "Innovation as Newness: What is New, How New, and New to Whom?", European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1): 20-31.
  6. Klomp, L. ve Van Leeuwen, G.(2001). "Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach", International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3): 343-364, DOI: 10.1080/13571510110079612. Laursen, K. ve Salter, A. (2004). "Searching High and Low: What Types of Firms Use Universities as a Source of Innovation?" Research Policy, 33(8): 1201-1215.
  7. Mairesse, J.; Mohnen, P.; Zhao, Y. ve Zhen, F. (2012). "Globalization, Innovation and Productivity in Manufacturing Firms: A Study of Four Sectors of China.", ERIA discussion paper, 10. Michaelis, L. (2003). The Role of Business in Sustainable Consumption", Journal of Cleaner Production, 11: 915-921.
  8. Midgley, D. F. ve Dowling, G. R. (1978). "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement", Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4): 229-242.
  9. Ahmed, P. K. (1998). "Culture and Climate for Innovation", European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1): 30 - 43. Subramanian, A. ve Nilakanta, S. (1996). "Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance", Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 24(6): 631-647.
  10. TaGkın, F. ve Zaim, O. (1997). "Catching-up and Innovation in High-and Low-Income Countries", Economics Letter, 54: 93-10