Journals / Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Radiologic Findings in Subtypes of Ovarian Serous Tumours

Over Seröz Tümörlerinin Alt Tiplerinde Radyolojik Bulguların Karşılaştırılması

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Radiological imaging is important in terms of diagnosis of ovarian serous tumors and differentiation of subtypes in the preoperative period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Ovarian serous neoplasms are the most common type among epithelial ovarian neoplasms and are divided into benign, borderline and malignant subtypes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods : In this retrospective study, patients who were histopathologically diagnosed as benign, borderline and malignant ovarian serous tumors in our hospital between 2012 and 2019, and who had preoperative computed tomography (CT) and / or magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Radiological imaging is important in terms of diagnosis of ovarian serous tumors and differentiation of subtypes in the preoperative period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Ovarian serous neoplasms are the most common type among epithelial ovarian neoplasms and are divided into benign, borderline and malignant subtypes. The aim of this study is to compare the radiological findings of ovarian serous neoplasia subtypes and define the radiological findings that can be used to distinguish them from each other. Material and Methods : In this retrospective study, patients who were histopathologically diagnosed as benign, borderline and malignant ovarian serous tumors in our hospital between 2012 and 2019, and who had preoperative computed tomography (CT) and / or magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were included in the study. The age of the patient, location, size, dominant component of the tumor, wall and septa thickness in cystic tumors, mural nodule, infiltrative pattern, bleeding, peritoneal invasion, and presence of peritoneal fluid were compared among subtypes. ResultsFifty-six tumors, 6 benign, 15 borderline and 35 malignant, were included in the study. Borderline tumor cases were younger than other types. Bilaterality of the malignant type was higher than that of the borderline type. Benign and borderline types contained more cystic components than malignant types. Wall and septa thicknesses were greater in malignant tumors. Mural nodules were found significantly more common in borderline and malign types than benign types. Infiltrative pattern was observed only in malign type. Peritoneal spread was significantly higher in malignant type than borderline type. Conclusion Similar to the literature, in serous ovarian tumors, relatively young age is seen in borderline type, thick wall and septa, solid component predominance, infiltrative pattern and peritoneal spread are seen in malign type. Mural nodules can be present in both borderline and malign types. Radiological imaging is important in terms of diagnosis of ovarian serous tumors and differentiation of subtypes in the preoperative period.

Özet

Amaç: Over seröz neoplazileri, epitelyal over neoplazileri arasında en sık görülen tip olup benign, borderline ve malign alt tiplerine ayrılır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, over seröz neoplazisi alt tiplerine ait radyolojik bulguları karşılaştırarak birbirinden ayırt edebilmek için kullanılabilecek radyolojik bulguları tanımlamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, hastanemizde 2012 – 2019 yılları arasında histopatolojik olarak benign, borderline ve malign over seröz tümörü tanısı almış olan ve preoperatif dönemde bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ve/veya manyetik rezonans (MR) incelemeleri bulunan olgular çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastanın yaşı, tümörün lokalizasyonu, boyutu, baskın komponenti, kistik tümörlerde duvar ve septa kalınlıkları, mural nodül, infiltratif patern, kanama, peritoneal yayılım, peritoneal sıvı varlığı alt tipler arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 6’sı benign, 15’i borderline ve 35’i malign olmak üzere 56 tümör dahil edildi. Borderline tümör olguları diğer tiplere göre daha gençti. Malign tipin bilateralitesi borderline tipe göre fazlaydı. Benign ve borderline tipler malign tipe göre daha fazla kistik komponent içeriyordu. Malign tümörlerde duvar ve septa kalınlıkları daha fazlaydı. Mural nodül, borderline ve malign tiplerde benign tipe göre anlamlı olarak daha sık bulundu. İnfiltratif patern yalnızca malign tipte izlendi. Peritoneal yayılım malign tipte borderline tipe göre anlamlı olarak daha fazlaydı. Sonuç: Seröz over tümörlerinde literatüre benzer biçimde görece genç yaş borderline tip, kalın duvar ve septa varlığı, solid komponent baskınlığı, infiltratif patern ve peritoneal yayılım malign tip, mural nodül varlığı ise borderline ve malign tiplerde görülmektedir. Radyolojik görüntüleme, over seröz tümörlerinin tanısı, alt tiplerinin preoperatif dönemde ayırt edilmesi açısından önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELMALI, F., KARASU, Ş., ÇİLENGİR, A. H. (2022). Comparison of Radiologic Findings in Subtypes of Ovarian Serous Tumours. Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/495616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C ve ark. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlationwith US. Radiology. 1991 Mar;178(3):811-8
  2. Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung JI, Hahn ST. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):1305-25
  3. Nougaret S, Lakhman Y, Molinari N ve ark. CT Features of Ovarian Tumors:Defining Key Differences Between Serous Borderline Tumors and Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):918-926
  4. Javadi S, Ganeshan DM, Qayyum A, Iyer RB, Bhosale P, Cancer O. Ovarian Cancer, the Revised FIGO Staging System, and the Role of Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206: 1351–60
  5. Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I ve ark. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 123–9
  6. Kawamoto S, Urban BA, Fishman EK. CT of epithelial ovarian tumors. RadioGraphics 1999; 19: S85–S102
  7. Pretorius ES, Outwater EK, Hunt JL, Siegelman ES. Magnetic resonance imaging of the ovary. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 12:131–146
  8. Alobaid A, Memon A, Alobaid S, Aldakhil L. Laparoscopic management of huge ovarian cysts. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:380854
  9. Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5):1445-70
  10. Virgilio BA, De Blasis I, Sladkevicius P ve ark. Imaging in gynecological disease (16): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous cystadenofibromas in adnexa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;54(6):823-830
  11. Bent CL, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Singh N, Sohaib SA, Reznek RH. MRI appearances of borderline ovarian tumours. Clin Radiol. 2009 Apr;64(4):430-8
  12. Morgan RJ Jr, Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD ve ark. Ovarian Cancer, Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr CancNetw. 2016 Sep;14(9):1134-63
  13. Nakai G, Yamada T, Yamamoto K, Hirose Y, Ohmichi M, Narumi Y. MRI appearance of ovarian serous borderline tumors of the micropapillary type compared to that of typical ovarian serous borderline tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Ovarian Res. 2018 Jan 10;11(1):7
  14. Naqvi J, Nagaraju E, Ahmad S. MRI appearances of püre epithelial papillary serous borderline ovarian tumours. Clin Radiol. 2015 Apr;70(4):424-32
  15. Outwater EK, Huang AB, Dunton CJ ve ark. Papillary projections in ovarian neoplasms: appearance