SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Bishop Score and Posterior Cervical Angle on the Success of Birth Induction Due to Over 41 Weeks Pregnancy

Bishop Skoru ve Posterior Serviks Açısının 41 Hafta Üzerindeki Gebeliklerde İndüksiyon Başarısını Değerlendirmedeki Yeri

Mehmet Ferdi KINCI
Özge ŞEHİRLİ KINCI
Kazım Emre KARAŞAHİN
Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The groups that responded to induction and did not respond to vaginal deliveries and delivered cesarean were compared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: To determine the predictive value of posterior cervical angle (PCA) on successful labor induction in pregnancies with low Bishop scores, which lasts longer than the 41st gestational week.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: A total of 116 pregnant women with a low Bishop score who were admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and July 2018 were studied prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The groups that responded to induction and did not respond to vaginal deliveries and delivered cesarean were compared.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the predictive value of posterior cervical angle (PCA) on successful labor induction in pregnancies with low Bishop scores, which lasts longer than the 41st gestational week. Method: A total of 116 pregnant women with a low Bishop score who were admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and July 2018 were studied prospectively. The groups that responded to induction and did not respond to vaginal deliveries and delivered cesarean were compared. P value was taken as

Özet

Giriş: Düşük Bishop skoru olan, 41. gebelik haftasının üzerindeki gebeliklerde posterior serviks açısının (PSA) doğum indüksiyonu başarısı açısından prediktif değerini belirlemek. Method: Ocak 2018 – Temmuz 2018 tarihleri arasında hastanemize başvurup düşük Bishop skoru olan 116 gebe prospektif olarak değerlendirildi. İndüksiyona yanıt vererek vajinal doğumu gerçekleşen ve çeşitli nedenler ile sezaryen ile doğumu gerçekleşen gruplar karşılaştırıldı. Sonuçlar için istatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi için p değeri

🔖

Cite This Article

KINCI, M. F., KINCI, Ö. Ş., KARAŞAHİN, K. E. (2022). The Effect of Bishop Score and Posterior Cervical Angle on the Success of Birth Induction Due to Over 41 Weeks Pregnancy. Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 3, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/495572

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No 579: definition of term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013
  2. 122(5):1139-40. 2.Myers ER BR, Christian AL, et al. Management of prolonged pregnancy. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2002-53. 3.Delaney M, Roggensack A, Leduc DC, Ballermann C, Biringer A, Dontigny L, et al. Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+ 0 to 42+ 0 weeks. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2008
  3. 30(9):800-10. 4.Elden H, Hagberg H, Wessberg A, Sengpiel V, Herbst A, Bullarbo M, et al. Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016
  4. 16(1):49. 5.McCarthy FP, Kenny LC. Induction of labour. Obstetrics, Gynaecology& Reproductive Medicine. 2014
  5. 24(1):9-15. 6.Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1964
  6. 24(2):266-8. 7.Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005
  7. 105(4):690-7. 8.Saccone, G., Simonetti, B., &Berghella, V. (2016). Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length for prediction of spontaneous labour at term: a systematic review and meta­analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &Gynaecology, 123(1), 16-22. 9.Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002
  8. 100(1):164-7. 10.Spelaccy WN SJ, Disaia PJ, Hammond CB, JB. Postdate Pregnancy. 7th Edition ed. Philedelphia: Lippincott Company
  9. Mandruzzato G, Alfirevic Z, Chervenak F, Gruenebaum A, Heimstad R, Heinonen S, et al. Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2010
  10. 38(2):111-9. 12.Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 146: Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014
  11. 124(2 Pt 1):390. 13.Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2000(2):CD000170-CD. 14.Uzun I, Sık A, Şevket O, Aygün M, Karahasanoglu A, Yazıcıoglu HF. Bishop score versus ultrasound of the cervix before induction of labor for prolonged pregnancy: which one is better for prediction of cesarean delivery. T