Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Interobserver Reproducibility of Intracranial Anatomy Assessment During Second Trimester Sonographic Scan

Pages
511–514
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Measurements of lateral ventricle have shown moderate to strong interclass correlation (r=0.73, P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To evaluate the reproducibility of mid-trimester intracranial anatomy assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Women undergoing mid-trimester scan (between 18th to 25th gestational weeks) for fetal anatomy assessment were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Measurements of lateral ventricle have shown moderate to strong interclass correlation (r=0.73, P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To evaluate the reproducibility of mid-trimester intracranial anatomy assessment. Women undergoing mid-trimester scan (between 18th to 25th gestational weeks) for fetal anatomy assessment were included in the study. Measurements of lateral ventricle (LV), cisterna magna (CM) and transverse cerebellar diameter (TCD) were obtained for reproducibility analyses. Inter-observer reproducibility analysis was made with correlation coefficients. A total of 162 women were included in the analysis while one woman was excluded from the study due to diagnosis of vermian agenesis. Correlation coefficient (CC) of cisterna magna measurements have shown weak to moderate interclass correlation (r=0.28, P=0.001). Measurements of lateral ventricle have shown moderate to strong interclass correlation (r=0.73, P

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, T., SÖYLEMEZ, F., KALAFAT, E., ASLAN, B., ÖZKAVUKÇU, E., KOÇ, A. (2022). Interobserver Reproducibility of Intracranial Anatomy Assessment During Second Trimester Sonographic Scan. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 511–514. https://ajindex.com/articles/494857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Boskey A, Vigorita V, Sencer O, Stuchin S, Lane J. Chemical, microscopic, and ultrastructural characterization of the mineral deposits in tumoral calcinosis. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1983: 258-269
  2. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez‐ Andrade E, Johnsen S, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid‐ trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2011; 37: 116-126
  3. Obstetrics ISoUi, Committee GE. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the'basic examination'and the'fetal neurosonogram'. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 29: 109-116
  4. Guibaud L. Fetal cerebral ventricular measurement and ventriculomegaly: time for procedure standardization. Wiley Online Library; 2009
  5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics 2007; 17: 571-582
  6. Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C, Armoogum P, Oury J, Cabrol D, et al. Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009; 33: 173-181
  7. Garel C. Fetal cerebral biometry: normal parenchymal findings and ventricular size. European radiology 2005; 15: 809-813.