SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of Short V.S Long-Term Antibiotic Prophylaxis In Gynecologic Surgery

Ecem KAYA
Onur KAYA
Cemre ÇELİK
Cem DANE
Pages
526–531
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In short-term perioperative prophylaxis group, surgical site infections rate were detected significantly higher p (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the difference between the prophylaxis made with only one or two dose first-generation cephalosporin and at least 3 days first-generation cephalosporin use in the emergence of surgical site infections in patients with vertical abdominal incision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was completed retrospectively by examining the file, computer and laboratory results of 91 postoperative patients with median incision who showed a high risk for infection in Haseki Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between August 2014-May 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In short-term perioperative prophylaxis group, surgical site infections rate were detected significantly higher p (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the difference between the prophylaxis made with only one or two dose first-generation cephalosporin and at least 3 days first-generation cephalosporin use in the emergence of surgical site infections in patients with vertical abdominal incision. This study was completed retrospectively by examining the file, computer and laboratory results of 91 postoperative patients with median incision who showed a high risk for infection in Haseki Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between August 2014-May 2015. In our study, surgical site infection in the short-term perioperative prophylaxis group is 57,1 percent of patients, while in long-term perioperative prophylaxis group this rate is 15,4 percent. In short-term perioperative prophylaxis group, surgical site infections rate were detected significantly higher p (

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, E., KAYA, O., ÇELİK, C., DANE, C. (2022). The Effect of Short V.S Long-Term Antibiotic Prophylaxis In Gynecologic Surgery. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 526–531. https://ajindex.com/articles/494849

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lizán-Garcia M, Garcia-Caballero J, AsensioVegas A. Risk factors for surgical-wound infection in general surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18: 310-315
  2. Nguyen D, MacLeod WB, Phung DC, Cong QT, Nguyen VH, Hamer DH. Incidance and predictors of surgical-site infections in Vietnam. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001; 22: 485-492
  3. Polk HC, Lopez-Mayor JP. Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Surgery 1969; 66: 97-103
  4. Yüksel Ö, Dilmen N, Use of antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis. III. Ulusal Yoğun Bakım İnfeksiyonları Sempozyumu 2007 (in turkish)
  5. Kalafat H. İ.Ü. Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Continuous Medical Training Hospital Infections: Prevention and Control Symposium Series No: 60 January 2008; 193- 206 (in turkish)
  6. Aslan E, Özvatan TŞ, Özer D, Kazak E, Yılmaz E; Evaluation of Surgical Prophylaxis Applications in a University Hospital; Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty 2012; 38: 7-11 (in turkish)
  7. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13: 606-608
  8. Sohn AH, Parvez FM, Vu T et al. Prevalance of surgical-site infections and patterns of antimicrobial use in a large tertiary-care hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23: 382-387
  9. Burke JF. The effective periodof preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961; 50: 161-168
  10. Wittmann DH, Schein M. Let us shorten antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in surgery. Am J Surg 1996; 172: 26-32
  11. Enzler MJ, Berbari E, Osmon DR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86: 686-701
  12. Ronald, AR, Conway, B. An approach to urinary tract infections in ambulatory women. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 1988; 9: 76-125
  13. Van Kasteren ME, Manniën J, Ott A, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Gyssens IC. An- tibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip art- hroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 921-927
  14. Dellinger EP. Prophylactic antibiotics: administration and timing before ope- ration are more important than administration after operation. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 928-930
  15. Al-Momany NH, Al-Bakri AG, Makahleh ZM, Wazaify MM. Adherence to in- ternational antimicrobial prophyla