Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

The Analysis of The Relationship Between The Cultural Intelligence and The Feeling of Compassion In The Health Staff

Pages
95–104
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that among the health staff 83% performed their job with enjoyed, 65.4% considered their performance effective and 93.4% perceived themselves compassionate. 80.2% of the health staff believes that they had cultural intelligence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aim to analyze the relationship between the cultural intelligence and the feeling of compassion in the health staff.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The universe of the research is composed of the health staff who service in a university hospital (n=925).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that among the health staff 83% performed their job with enjoyed, 65.4% considered their performance effective and 93.4% perceived themselves compassionate. 80.2% of the health staff believes that they had cultural intelligence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we aim to analyze the relationship between the cultural intelligence and the feeling of compassion in the health staff. The universe of the research is composed of the health staff who service in a university hospital (n=925). The data of the research was collected with “Personal Information Form”, “The Cultural Intelligence Scale” and “The Compassion Scale”. Mann-Whitney U Test, Kruskal-Wallis Test and Spearman Correlation Analysis were used for the statistical analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.895 for the cultural intelligence scale and to be 0.876 for the compassion scale, respectively. Based on the study, it was determined that the age average of the health staff was 31.15±6.99 and the average service period was 7.83±6.06. It was found that among the health staff 83% performed their job with enjoyed, 65.4% considered their performance effective and 93.4% perceived themselves compassionate. 80.2% of the health staff believes that they had cultural intelligence. According to the cultural intelligence scale, the average score of the health staff was calculated to be 96.54±18.43. This number was found to be 88.61±14.96 in the compassion scale. It was determined that there was a strong positive relationship (r=0.74) between the cultural intelligence and the feeling of compassion in the health staff. We believe that the health staff that has a cultural intelligence would evaluate the patients considering cultural parameters and thus be less judgmental and show more compassion.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNER, Ş. İ., KARAASLAN, S., GÜNER, S., ORHUN, R., ULAY, G. (2022). The Analysis of The Relationship Between The Cultural Intelligence and The Feeling of Compassion In The Health Staff. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 95–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/494831

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akdeniz S, Deniz ME. The Turkish adaptation of the Compassion Scale: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being 2016;4(1), 50-61
  2. Pommier, EA. The compassion scale. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 2011;72, 1174
  3. Uğurlu AK, Eti Aslan F, Compassion and Nursing: Can Compassion be Measured? Review, Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci 2017;9(3):233-8
  4. Burnell L, Agan DL, Compassionate Care: Can it be Defined and Measured? The Development of the Compassionate Care Assessment Tool, International Journal of Caring Sciences 2013;6 (2), 180-187
  5. Ang SLV, Dyne C, Koh KY, Ng, KJ, Templer, CT, Chandrasekar NA. Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation and Task Performance. Management and Organization Review 2007;3 (3), 337-338
  6. Griffer, MR. Perlis SM. Developing Cultural Intelligence in Preservice Speech-Language Pathologists and Educators. Communication Disorders Quarterly 2007;29 (1), 28-29
  7. İşçi E, Söylemez Ö, Kaptanoğlu AY. A Research Conducted to Determıne Cultural Intellıgence Level in Hospıtal Management. Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty 2013;5 1-18
  8. Crowne, KA, Phatak AV, Salunkhe U, Shivarajan S. Exploring Intelligences, Organizational Skills and Leadership in Mumbai, India, International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology. 2011;1(2), 45-47 9. DiStefano, JJ, Maznevski, ML. Global Leaders are Team Players: Developing Global Leaders Through Membershıp on Global Teams. Human Resource Management, 2000;39 (2;3), 195–208
  9. Tan, JS. Issues & observations: cultural intelligence and the global economy. Leadership in Action, 2004;24 (5), 19-21
  10. Çetin ÇK. Cultural Intellıgence: A Research on Master Marıners and Chıef Offıcers. Gazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2014;16(2): 134-155
  11. İlhan M, Çetin B, Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Cultural Intelligence Scale, Hacettepe University Journal of Education. 2014;29(2), 94-114
  12. Büyüköztürk Ş. Manual of data analysis for social sciences, Ankara, Pegem Akademi Publishing, 2007;1-20
  13. Pallant, J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Australia, McGraw-Hill Education, 2005;1-58
  14. Tezbaşaran AA. Likert type scale development guide. Ankara. Turkish Psychologists Association Publications 1997;