Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Investigation The Antimutagenic Effects Of Smilax Excelsa L. Extracts By Ames/Salmonella/Microsome Test System

Smilax Excelsa L. Ekstraktlarının Ames/Salmonella/Mikrozom Test Sistemi İle Antimutajenik Etkisinin Araştırılması

Pages
622–631
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And also all the extracts of Smilax excelsa L. showed antimutagenic activity with different rates .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, leaf and fruit extracts of Smilax excelsa L., were investigated for antimutagenic activity by Ames/Salmonella/microsome test method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fruit and leaf extracts was not observed the cytotoxic effect in the range of 10-100 mg/mL doses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And also all the extracts of Smilax excelsa L. showed antimutagenic activity with different rates .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Smilax excelsa L. · Ames/Salmonella/mikrozom test sistemi · Antimutajenik aktivite

Abstract

In this study, leaf and fruit extracts of Smilax excelsa L., were investigated for antimutagenic activity by Ames/Salmonella/microsome test method. Fruit and leaf extracts was not observed the cytotoxic effect in the range of 10-100 mg/mL doses. Antimutagenity analysis were studies with S9(+) and S9(-) on Salmonella typhimurium TA 98 and TA 100 strains. Maximum antimutagenic activity was observed with leaf extracts at 100 mg/plaque dose on TA98 strain in the absence of S9 as 88%. And also all the extracts of Smilax excelsa L. showed antimutagenic activity with different rates .

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Smilax excelsa L. yaprak ve meyve ekstraktlarının antimutajenik aktiviteleri Ames/Salmonella/mikrozom test yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Smilax excelsa L. yaprak ve meyve ekstraktlarının 10-100 mg/mL doz aralığında sitotoksik etki göstermediği belirlenmiştir. Antimutajenite çalışmaları S9 (+) ve S9 (-) olmak üzere Salmonella typhimurium TA98 ve TA100 suşları ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Maksimum antimutajenik etki yaprak ekstraktı ile 100 mg/plak dozunda TA98 suşu üzerine S9 karışımı yokluğunda %88 olarak elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, Smilax excelsa L. bitkisinin tüm ekstraktlarının farklı oranlarda antimutajenik aktiviteye sahip oldukları belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, E., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, K., AZAP, E. (2022). Investigation The Antimutagenic Effects Of Smilax Excelsa L. Extracts By Ames/Salmonella/Microsome Test System. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 622–631. https://ajindex.com/articles/494587

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Ö. Süzer. 3. baskı. Klinisyen Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul. (2010). C.M. Stein. Cli. Pharmacol. Therapeutics. 71 (2002) 411-423. Anonim. http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antioksidan. 2010. [erişim Tarihi: 16 Ağustos 2010] L. Iarc. Monographs on the carcinogenic risks of chemicals to humans. supp. z. Long Term Screening Assays For Carcinogens. A Critical Appraisal, IARC Monographs Supplement 2. IARC Lyon, International Agency For Research on Cancer. (1980).
  2. M. Hofnung, P. Quillardet. Mutagenesis. 1(5) (1986) 319-330.
  3. X. Shuo, S. Ming-Ying, L. Guang-Xue, X. Feng, W. Xuan, S. Cheng-Chao, C. Shao-Qing. Molecule. 18 (2013) 5265-5287.
  4. M. C. Navarro, M.P. Montilla, M.M. Cabo, M. Galisteo, A. Cáceres, C. Morales, I. Berger. Phytotherapy Research. 17 (2003) 325–329.
  5. J. Jiang, Q. Xu. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 85 (2003) 53–59.
  6. T. Chen, J. Li, J. Cao, Q. Xu, K. Komatsu, T. Namba. Planta Medica. 65 (1999) 56–59.
  7. S.E. Lee, E.M. Ju, J.H. Kim. Experimental and Molecular Medicine. 33 (2001) 263–268.
  8. B.J. Dean, T.M. Brooks, G. Hodsonwalker, D.H. Hutson. Mutat Res. 153(1985) 57-77.
  9. A. Uysal, I. Lazarova, G. Zengin, E. Guneş, A. Aktumsek, R. Gevrenova. Brit J Pharm Res. 10 (2016).
  10. D.M. Maron, B.N. Ames. Mutat. Res. 113 (1983) 173-215.
  11. G. Zengin, A. Uysal, E. Gunes, A. Aktumsek. Plos One 9 (2014) 1-13.
  12. K. Schutz, R. Carle, A. Schieber. J Ethnopharmacol 107 (2006) 313-23.
  13. J. Yamada, Y. Tomita. Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 58 (12) (1994) 2197-2200.
  14. S. Wu, G. Yen, B. Wang, C. Chiu, W. Yen, L. Chang, P. Duh. Lwt-Food Science and Technology. 40(3) (2007) 506-512.
  15. N. Turkmen, F. Sari, Y.S. Velioglu. Food Chem, 99 (2006) 835–841.
  16. J. Dai, R.J. Mumper. Molecules. 15 (2010) 7313–7352.
  17. H.K. Seo, J.H. Lee, H.S. Kim, C.K. Lee, S.C. Lee. Food Sci Biotechnol. 21 (2012) 1723-1727.
  18. N. Ozsoy, A. Can, R. Yanardağ, N. Akev. Food Chem. 110 (2008) 571-583.
  19. N. Özsoy, A. Okyar, P. Arda-Pirinçci, A. Can, Ş. Bolkent, N. Akev. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 19 (5) (2013) 807-814.
  20. T. Chen, J. Li, J. Cao, Q. Xu, K. Komatsu, T. Namba. Planta Med. 65 (1999) 56-59, 1999. Y.H. Kuo,Y.W. Hsu, C.C. Liaw, J.K. Lee, H.C. Huang, L.K.J. Kuo, J. Nat. Prod. 68 (2005) 1475. L. Longo, G. Vasapollo, Food Chem. 94 (2006) 226. T.B. Ng, Y.L. Yu, Int. J. Biochem. Biol. 33 (2001) 269. R.R. Bernardo, A.V. Pinto, J.P. Parente, Phytochem. 43 (1996) 465. A. Ivanova, B. Mikhova, I. Klaiber, D. Dinchev, I. Kostova. Nat. Prod. Res. 23 (2009) 916. A. Ivanova, B. Mikhova, I. Kostova, I. Evstatieva. Chem Nat Compd. 46 (2010) 295-297. S.K.Gu