Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Solution of Reactive Power Planning Problem Including FACTS Devices by using PSOGSA Algorithm

FACTS Cihazlarını İçeren Reaktif Güç Planlama Probleminin Hibrit PSOGSA Algoritması Kullanarak Çözülmesi

Pages
1234–1257
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The comparison results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach to the other algorithms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Optimal reactive power planning problem is one of the most important problems of the modern power systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The proposed algorithm was applied to IEEE 30 bus test system with FACTS devices, such as thyristor control series compensator and thyristor control phase shifter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The comparison results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach to the other algorithms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Optimal reaktif güç planlama · Güç Sistemleri · Hibrit PSOGSA

Abstract

Optimal reactive power planning problem is one of the most important problems of the modern power systems. The main goal of the reactive power planning in modern power systems is to improve voltage profile and to reduce active power loss of the transmissions line. In this study, solution of the reactive power planning problem including FACTS devices is proposed by using hybrid PSOGSA algorithm. The proposed algorithm was applied to IEEE 30 bus test system with FACTS devices, such as thyristor control series compensator and thyristor control phase shifter. The obtained results from the proposed PSOGSA approach are compared to the obtained results from the vortex algorithm (VS), firefly algorithm (FA) and gravitational search algorithm (GSA). The comparison results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach to the other algorithms.

Özet

Optimal reaktif güç planlama problemi modern güç sistemlerinin en önemli problemlerinden biridir. Modern güç sistemlerinde reaktif güç planlamanın ana amacı, gerilim profilini iyileştirmek ve iletim hattının aktif güç kayıplarını azaltmaktır. Bu çalışmada, hibrit PSOGSA algoritması kullanılarak FACTS cihazlarını içeren reaktif güç planlama probleminin çözülmesi amaçlanmıştır. Amaçlanan algoritma, tristör kontrollü seri kapasitör ve tristör kontrollü faz kaydırıcı FACTS cihazlı IEEE 30 bara test sistemine uygulanmıştır. Amaçlanan hibrit PSOGSA yaklaşımından elde edilen sonuçlar girdap algoritması (VS), ateş böceği algoritması (FA) ve yerçekimsel arama algoritmasından elde edilen sonuçlarla karşılaştırılmıştır. Karşılaştırma sonuçları amaçlanan yaklaşımın kullanılan diğer algoritmalara üstünlüğünü göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, S. (2022). Solution of Reactive Power Planning Problem Including FACTS Devices by using PSOGSA Algorithm. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 1234–1257. https://ajindex.com/articles/494549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. K. Nuaekaew, P. Artrit, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, “Optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a two-archive multi-objective grey wolf optimizer,” Expert Systems With Applications, c. 87, ss. 79–89, 2017
  2. M. Basu, “Multi-objective optimal reactive power dispatch using multi-objective differential evolution,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, c. 82, ss. 213–224, 2016
  3. M. Mehdinejad, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, R. Dadashzadeh-Bonab, K. Zare, “Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch of power systems using hybrid particle swarm optimization and imperialist competitive algorithms,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, c. 83, ss. 104–116, 2016
  4. R. N. S. Mei, M. H. Sulaiman, Z. Mustaffa, H. Daniyal, “Optimal reactive power dispatch solution by loss minimization using moth-flame optimization technique,” Applied Soft Computing, c. 59, ss. 210–222, 2017
  5. A. A. Heidari, R. A. Abbaspour, A. R. Jordehi, “Gaussian bare-bones water cycle algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch in electrical power systems,” Applied Soft Computing, c. 57, ss. 657–671, 2017
  6. M. H. Sulaiman, Z. Mustaffa, M. R. Mohamed, O. Aliman, “Using the gray wolf optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem,” Applied Soft Computing, c. 32, ss. 286–292, 2015
  7. A. Rajan, T. Malakar, “Exchange market algorithm based optimum reactive power dispatch,” Applied Soft Computing, c. 43, ss. 320–336, 2016
  8. A. H. Khazali, M. Kalantar, “Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, c. 33, ss. 684–692, 2011
  9. K. Y. Lee, Y. M. Park, J. L. Ortiz, “A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, c. 104, s. 5, ss. 1147–1153, 1985
  10. N. Deeb, S. M. Shahidehpour, “Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, c. 5, s. 2, ss. 428–438, 1990
  11. S. Granville, “Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, c. 9, s. 1, ss. 136–146, 1994
  12. G. Chen, L. Liu, Z. Zhang, S. Huang, “Optimal reactive power dispatch by improved GSA based algorithm with the novel strategies to handle constraints,” Applied Soft Computing, c. 50, ss. 58–70, 2017
  13. B. Mandal, P. K. Roy, “Optimal reactive power dispatch using quasi-oppositional teachinglearning based