Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Main Indicators of OHS Management in Construction Sites

İnşaat Şantiyelerinde İş Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği (İSG) Yönetiminin Ana Belirteçleri

Pages
1391–1409
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to present the main determinants of OSH management in construction sector sites as a result of a literature review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite serious initiatives and campaigns on OHS in Turkey every year, statistical data shows that many have become incapacitated for work or lost their lives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The construction sector's performance in terms of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is even lower than in other sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to present the main determinants of OSH management in construction sector sites as a result of a literature review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Belirteç · İnşaat · İSG

Abstract

Despite serious initiatives and campaigns on OHS in Turkey every year, statistical data shows that many have become incapacitated for work or lost their lives. The construction sector's performance in terms of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is even lower than in other sectors. In SSI data, rates exceeding 23% of all accidents in this sector are observed. We believe that most of the diseases, injuries, incapacity and deaths related to these works can be reduced and prevented. We also believe that there are serious management skills weaknesses related to OSH in construction projects, as well as the causes stemming from work and worker. In connection with OHS, they are the traditional responsible contractors in construction sites and their project site and production managers. However, it is also known that these managers in the construction sites often do not have the awareness and knowledge of their legal and regulatory responsibilities related to OHS. This study aims to present the main determinants of OSH management in construction sector sites as a result of a literature review.

Özet

İnşaat sektörünün İşçi Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği (İSG) konusundaki performansı oldukça düşüktür. İSG ile ilgili ciddi inisiyatif ve kampanyalara rağmen istatistik veriler her yıl çok sayıda işgörenin işlerde ya işgöremez hale geldiğini veya hayatını kaybettiğini göstermektedir. Biz, bu işlerle ilgili hastalık, yaralanma, işgöremezlik ve ölümlerin en aza indirilebileceğine ve önlenebileceğine inanıyoruz. Ayrıca, işten ve işçiden kaynaklanan sebeplerin yanı sıra inşaat projelerinde İSG ile ilgili ciddi bir yönetim becerisi zaafının da olduğuna inanıyoruz. İSG ile ilgili olarak inşaat şantiyelerindeki geleneksel sorumlu müteahhitler ve onların şantiyedeki proje ve üretim yöneticileridir. Ancak, şantiyelerdeki bu yöneticiler çoğu kez İSG ile ilgili hukuksal ve mevzuatla ilgili sorumluluklarının farkındalık ve bilgiye sahip olmadıkları da bilinmektedir. Bu çalışma, inşaat sektörü şantiyelerinde İSG yönetiminin ana belirteçlerini bir literatür incelemesi sonucu olarak ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBIYIKLI, R., DİKMEN, S. Ü. (2022). Main Indicators of OHS Management in Construction Sites. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 1391–1409. https://ajindex.com/articles/494456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Lingard, H. & Rowlinson, S., Occupational Health and Safety in Construction Project Management, Taylor & Francis, UK, 2005 [2] Müngen, U. ve Gürcanlı, G.E. “Fatal traffic accidents in the Turkish construction industry” Safety Science.43 (5-6) ss. 299 – 322. [3] Heinrich, H. Industrial accident prevention, 4th Edition,
  2. New York, McGraw-Hill, USA, 1959. [4] Sanders, M. S. ve McCormick, E. Human Factors in Engineering and Design, McGraw-Hill Inc., Seventh Edition, Singapore, 1993. [5] Müngen, U. “İnşaat Sektörümüzdeki Başlıca İş Kazası Tipleri”, Türk Mühendislik Haberleri (TMH), 469-5, 2011. [6] SGK, Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu, 2014 yılı İş Kazaları ve Meslek Hastalıkları İstatistikleri, http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari Erişim: 30.06.2018 [7] ESAW (2014), European Statistics on Accident at Work, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitTableActio.do Erişim: 12.06.2017 [8] SGK, Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu, 2015 yılı İş Kazaları ve Meslek Hastalıkları İstatistikleri, http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari Erişim: 30.06.2018 [9] Rantanen, J., Kauppinen, T., Toikkannen, J, Kurppa, K., Lehtinen, S. ve Leine, T. Work and Health Country Profiles: Country Profiles and National Surveillance Indicators of Occupational Health and Safety, People and Work Research Reports, No. 44: Helsinki: Finish Institute of Occupational Health and Safety, 2001. [10] Kramers, P.G.N. “The ECHI project: Health Indicators for the European Community”, European Journal of Public Health, 13(3 Supplement), pp. 101-106, 2003. [11] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EASHW). The State of Occupational Safety and Health in the European Union – A Pilot study, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000. [12] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EASHW). Priorities for Occupational Safety and Health Research in the EU-25, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005. [13] EASHW, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Annual Report 2016, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017. [14] EUROFOUND, Fifth European Working Conditions Survey, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2012. [15] EUROFOUND, Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016. [16] ILO, Introductory report: Decent work -safe work, Inte