Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The Evaluation of PMDI Added Melamine Urea Formaldehyde (MUF) Resin in Particleboard Industry

PMDI İlaveli Melamin Üre Formaldehit (MÜF) Tutkalının Yongalevha Endüstrisinde Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
1957–1968
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that there was no statistically significant difference between all mechanical properties of the test and control boards except for screw holding performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the availability of PMDI resin for non-load bearing particleboard for use in humid conditions was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, PMDI resin was added to the middle layers of the boards at different participation rates (0% Control, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that there was no statistically significant difference between all mechanical properties of the test and control boards except for screw holding performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yongalevha · PMDI tutkalı · Melamin üre formaldehit tutkalı

Abstract

In this study, the availability of PMDI resin for non-load bearing particleboard for use in humid conditions was investigated. For this purpose, PMDI resin was added to the middle layers of the boards at different participation rates (0% Control, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2). Industrial chips used in particleboard production that it consists of 15% spruce, 50% pine, 20% oak, 10% slab, 5% sawdust. Particleboards were produced by using 65% melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF) resin with a density value of 630 kg / m3. Some physical (density, moisture, thickness swelling and water absorption for 2 and 24 hours) and mechanical properties of particleboards (bending strength, modulus of elasticity, internal bond, surface soundness and screw holding performance) were tested according to TS EN standards. According to the test results, thickness swelling values of the test boards for 24 hour were found to be below 14%. It was found that there was no statistically significant difference between all mechanical properties of the test and control boards except for screw holding performance. The values of all physical and mechanical properties of the boards indicated that they meet the minimum requirements in the P3 type (non load-bearing boards for use in humid conditions) specified in TS EN 312 (2012) standard.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, nemli şartlarda kullanılan ve yük taşıyıcı olmayan yongalevhalarda PMDI tutkalının kullanılabilirliği araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla PMDI tutkalı, farklı katılım oranlarında (%0-Kontrol, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 ve 2) yongalevhaların orta tabakalarına ilave edilmiştir. Levha üretiminde kullanılan endüstriyel yongalar; %15 ladin, %50 çam, %20 meşe, %10 kapak tahtası, %5’i atık talaştan oluşmaktadır. Yoğunluk değeri 630 kg/m3 olan, %65’lik melamin üre formaldehit (MÜF) tutkalı kullanılarak yongalevhalar üretilmiştir. Levhaların bazı fiziksel (yoğunluk, rutubet, 2-24 saat kalınlık artımı ve su alma oranı) ve mekanik özellikleri (eğilme direnci, eğilmede elastikiyeti modülü, yapışma direnci, yüzey sağlamlığı ve vida tutma direnci) TS EN standartlarına göre test edilmiştir. Deney sonuçlarına göre test levhalarının 24 saatlik kalınlık artış değerleri, %14’ün altında tespit edilmiştir. Vida tutma direnci dışındaki tüm mekanik özellikler bakımından test ve kontrol levhaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farkın olmadığı anlaşılmıştır. Levhaların tüm fiziksel ve mekanik özelliklerine ait değerleri, TS EN 312 (2012) standardında belirtilen P3 tipi (nemli şartlarda kullanılan yük taşıyıcı olmayan levhalar) kullanım alanlarında aranan minimum gereksinimleri karşıladığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVDAR, V., ŞAHİN, H. İ. (2022). The Evaluation of PMDI Added Melamine Urea Formaldehyde (MUF) Resin in Particleboard Industry. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1957–1968. https://ajindex.com/articles/494430

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. A. Nuryawan and E. M. Alamsyah, “A review of isocyanate wood adhesive: a case study in Indonesia,” In Applied Adhesive Bonding in Science and Technology, London, England, IntechOpen, 2017, Chapter 5, pp. 73-90
  2. Yonga levhalar - Tarif ve Sınıflandırma, Türk Standartları Enstitüsü TS EN 309, 2008
  3. Y. Göker, “Değişik Yöntemlerle Üretilmiş Yonga Levhaların Kullanım Yerleri,” Laminart Mobilya ve Dekorasyon ve Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, c. 7, ss. 128-133, 2000
  4. H. Kalaycıoğlu ve R. Özen, Yongalevha endüstrisi, Ders notları, Trabzon, 2012
  5. H. Juslin and L. Lintu, “Responcesto changes in demand, supply of forest products through improved marketing,” XI. World Forestry Congress, Antalya, Türkiye, 1997, ss.121-135
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2019, 21 Mart). [Online]. Erişim:
  7. A. N. Papadopoulos, C. A. S. Hill, E. Traboulay and J. R. B. Hague, “Isocyanate Resins for Particleboard: PMDI and EMDI,” European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 81-83, 2002
  8. W. E. Johns, “Isocyanates as Wood Binders-A Review,” The Journal of Adhesion, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59-67, 1982
  9. M. Dunky, Adhesives in the wood industry, Handbook of Adhesive Technology, In A. Pizzi, K. L. Mittal (eds.), New York, ABD, Chapter 47, pp. 872–941,2003
  10. D. Sandberg, “Additives in wood products – today and future developments,” Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-based Bioproducts, Switzerland, Springer Singapore, 2016, pp. 105-172
  11. D. Grunwald, “Adhesives for wood-based boards,” Presented in 1st Euro-Asian International Short-Course on Wood-based Composites, Trabzon, 2014
  12. Z. Pan, A. Cathcart and D. Wang, “Properties of Particleboard Bond with Rice Bran and Polymeric Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate Adhesives,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 40-45, 2006
  13. Z. Pan, Y. Zheng, R. Zhang and B. M. Jenkins, “Physical Properties of Thin Particleboard Made from Saline Eucalyptus,” Industrial Crops And Products, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 185-194, 2007
  14. S. Y. Wang, T. H. Yang, L. T. Lin, C. J. Lin and M. J. Tsai, “Properties of Low-Formaldehyde-emission Particleboard Made from Recycled Wood-Waste Chips Sprayed with PMDI/PF Resin,” Building and Environment, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 2472-2479, 2007
  15. A. Papadopoulos, “Property Comparisons and Bonding Efficiency of UF and PMDI Bonded Particleboards as Affected by Key Process Variables,” BioRe