SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Auto-stereoskopik 3BTV için Öznel Deneyim Kalitesi Modellerinin

Comparison of Subjective QoE Models for Auto-Stereoscopic 3DTV

Nükhet ÖZBEK
Pages
1061–1072
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that the performances of the proposed models are comparable to each other and both models are superior to the conventional method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Measuring Quality of Experience (QoE) of stereoscopic 3D video is a hot research topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, a fair comparison method is proposed to evaluate performances of the three subjective methods using the same stimuli prepared with the most recent multi-view video codec on an auto-stereoscopic 3DTV.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrate that the performances of the proposed models are comparable to each other and both models are superior to the conventional method.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:QoE · 3DTV · SSIM

Özet

Measuring Quality of Experience (QoE) of stereoscopic 3D video is a hot research topic. Subjective models are considered as the most reliable and facilitate development of objective models. However, to collect user opinion scores takes long time. Therefore, new subjective assessment models should be proposed providing not only time-efficiency but also good accuracy and reliability. In this study, two novel subjective QoE models are proposed as alternative to the conventional Double Stimulus Continuous Quality Scale method. Also, a fair comparison method is proposed to evaluate performances of the three subjective methods using the same stimuli prepared with the most recent multi-view video codec on an auto-stereoscopic 3DTV. Correlations are calculated using two objective QoE measures using depth maps and structural similarities. The results demonstrate that the performances of the proposed models are comparable to each other and both models are superior to the conventional method.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEK, N. (2022). Auto-stereoskopik 3BTV için Öznel Deneyim Kalitesi Modellerinin. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1061–1072. https://ajindex.com/articles/494368

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ITU-R Recommendations Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11, 2002
  2. ITU-R Recommendations Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of Video Quality in Multimedia Applications, ITU-R Recommendation BT.1788, 2007
  3. N. Özbek, G. Ertan, and O. Karakuş, “Perceptual quality evaluation of asymmetric stereo video coding for efficient 3D rate scaling”, Turk. J. Elec. Eng. & Comp. Sci., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 663–678, 2014
  4. P. Aflaki, M. M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj, “Subjective quality assessment of asymmetric stereoscopic 3D video,” Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 9, pp. 1–15, 2015
  5. J. Li, O. Kaller, F. D. Simone, J. Hakala, D. Juzska, and P. L. Callet, “Cross-lab Study on Preference of Experience in 3DTV: Influence from Display Technology and Test Environment”, IEEE Workshop: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2013, pp. 46–47
  6. ITU-R Recommendations Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications, ITU-R Recommendation P.910, 2008
  7. J. Li, M. Barkowsky, and P. Le Callet, “Analysis and improvement of a paired comparison method in the application of 3DTV subjective experiment”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2012, pp. 629–632
  8. Z. Duanmu, A. Rehman, K. Zeng and Z. Wang, “Quality-of-Experience Prediction for Streaming Video,” IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2016, pp. 145–151
  9. F. Qi, D. Zhao, X. Fan, and T. Jiang, “Stereoscopic video quality assessment based on visual attention and just-noticeable difference models,” Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 10, no.4, pp. 737–744, 2016
  10. E. Şenol and N. Özbek, “Quality of experience measurement of compressed multi-view video”, Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 57, pp.147–159, 2017
  11. P. Merkle, A. Smolic, K. Müller, and T. Wiegand, “Multi-view Video plus Depth Representation and Coding”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2007, pp. 201–204
  12. C. Zhu, Y. Zhao, L. Yu, and M. Tanimoto, 3D-TV System with Depth-Image Based Rendering: Architectures Techniques and Challenges, USA: Springer, 2013
  13. G. J. Sullivan, J.-R. Ohm, J.-R. Han, and T. Wiegand, “Overview of Highy Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard”, IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1649–1668, 2012
  14. ITU-R Recommendations Subjective Methods for the Assessment of Stereoscopic 3D