SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The Theory of Construction Project Management and Construction Sector Relationship: A Review Study

İnşaat Proje Yönetimi Teorisi ve İnşaat Sektörü İlişkisi: Bir İnceleme Çalışması

S. Ümit DİKMEN
Rıfat AKBIYIKLI
Pages
136–159
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A detailed literature survey and oversight results based on the mentioned parameters have been explained in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The construction sector is a sector that shapes the built environment, including all types of superstructures and infrastructure and transportation systems for humanity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All this work is made up of man-made technology with complex work methods and organizational structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A detailed literature survey and oversight results based on the mentioned parameters have been explained in the study.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değer · İnşaat Sektörü · Proje

Abstract

The construction sector is a sector that shapes the built environment, including all types of superstructures and infrastructure and transportation systems for humanity. All this work is made up of man-made technology with complex work methods and organizational structures. It emerges as a process that values the inputs of the production process, namely land, labour, materials, machinery-equipment, money (capital) and management parameters and is presented to the end user. The most important factor in this valorisation production process is construction management. This work acknowledges that it is related to production management, construction project management and other related disciplines and is in a complex network of relationships; and if a theory for construction is to be developed, it claims to be based on production and production management and project management (disciplines of project management interest). A detailed literature survey and oversight results based on the mentioned parameters have been explained in the study.

Özet

İnşaat sektörü insanlığa her türlü üst - yapı ve altyapı ve ulaştırma sistemleri de dâhil olmak üzere, yapılı çevreyi şekillendiren bir sektörüdür. Bu bağlamda sektörün bu çabası, karmaşık iş yaptırma yöntemleri ve organizasyon yapıları ile insan yapımı teknolojiden oluşmaktadır. Üretim sürecinin girdileri olan toprak, işgücü, malzeme, makine-ekipman, para (sermaye) ve yönetim parametreleri değer kazandıran bir proses olarak ortaya çıkmakta ve son kullanıcıya sunulmaktadır. Bu değer kazandırmanın üretim sürecindeki en önemli faktörü inşaat yönetimidir. Bu çalışma, üretim yönetimi ile inşaat proje yönetimi ve bağlı diğer disiplinlerin birbiri ile ilişkili olduğunu ve karmaşık bir ilişki ağı içerisinde olduğunu kabul etmekte ve inşaat için bir teori geliştirilecekse, bunun üretim ve üretim yönetimi ve proje yönetimi (proje yönetimi ilgi alanı olan disiplinler) üzerine dayandırılacağını iddia etmektedir. Bahsi geçen parametrelere dayalı olarak yapılan detaylı literatür araştırması ve gözden geçirme sonuçları çalışma içerisinde izah edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKMEN, S. Ü., AKBIYIKLI, R. (2022). The Theory of Construction Project Management and Construction Sector Relationship: A Review Study. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 136–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/494331

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. M. Porter, Competitive Strategy, Techniques For Analyzing Industries And Competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980
  2. G. De Valance, “A theory of construction management?,” Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 95-100, 2012
  3. PMI, “A guide to the project management body of knowledge,” (PMBOK GUIDE), Project Management Institute, 4th ed., Global Standard, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA, 2008
  4. M. Hobday, “Project complexity, innovation and industrial organisation”, Research Policy, vol. 26, no.6, pp. 689-710, 1998
  5. N. D. Caldwell, J. K. Roehrich, and A. C. Davies, “Procuring complex performance in construction: London Heathrow Terminal 5 and a Private Finance Initiative Hospital,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 178-186, 2009
  6. R. Fellows, and A. M. M. Liu, “Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 653-671, 2012
  7. A. Drach-Zahavy, A. Somech, “From an intra team to an interteam perspective of effectiveness: the role of interdependence and boundary activities,” Small Group Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 143-174, 2010
  8. P. R. Lawrence and J. W. Lorsch, “Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration,” Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA, 1967
  9. P. M. Hillebrand, Economic Theory and the Construction Industry, 3rd ed., Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000
  10. H.A. Simon, The Sciences of The Artificial, 3rd ed., Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 1996
  11. J. D. Thompson, Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1967
  12. R. L. Daft, Organization Theory and Design, 4th ed., St. Paul, MN, USA: West Publishing, 1992
  13. L. Koskela, “We need a theory of construction”, Berkley-Stanford CE & M Workshop: Defining a Research Agenda for AEC Process/Product Development in 2000 and Beyond,” Stanford, Stanford University, 1999, pp. 26-28
  14. M. Porter, Competitive Advantage, The Free Press, 1985
  15. J. C. Wortmann, Factory Of Future: Towards An Integrated Theory For One-Of-A-Kind Production”, In: One-Of-A-Kind Production: New Approaches, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1992, pp. 37-74
  16. F.B. Gilbreth and L.M. Gilbreth, “Process charts and their place in management,” Mec