Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Comparative Analysis of Two Different Light Rail Superstructures in Istanbul Traffic in Terms of Vibration

İstanbul Trafiğinde Bulunan İki Farklı Hafif Metro Üstyapısının Titreşim Bakımından Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Pages
589–607
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, in terms of the safety investigations of the buildings around the line, a meaningful decrease in vibrations greater than 70 Hz is observed and it is concluded that residential buildings could be built up to 5 m distance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Railway-induced vibrations are one of the major problems that need to be suppressed for the passengers or people who are living around the railway.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, two different railway superstructures used in Istanbul railway traffic were tested while passing the railway vehicle at various speeds, and the vibrations generated by the wheel-rail interaction were compared regarding passenger comfort and the environment in compliance with the relevant standards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, in terms of the safety investigations of the buildings around the line, a meaningful decrease in vibrations greater than 70 Hz is observed and it is concluded that residential buildings could be built up to 5 m distance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Demiryolu · Üstyapı · Ray pedi

Abstract

Railway-induced vibrations are one of the major problems that need to be suppressed for the passengers or people who are living around the railway. It is essential that the vibrations are first tried to be suppressed on the source, railway. Thus, the railway superstructure components contain various elastic elements used in vibration insulation, such as rail pads. In this study, two different railway superstructures used in Istanbul railway traffic were tested while passing the railway vehicle at various speeds, and the vibrations generated by the wheel-rail interaction were compared regarding passenger comfort and the environment in compliance with the relevant standards. Used railway superstructures to compare the propagated vibrations are constructions with single and double elastomeric layers installed on the same line, sequentially. In this experimental benchmarking study which contains some evaluations according to standards, the behaviour of these two railway superstructure types in terms of vibration insulation in light metro lines is revealed using measurement results. Consequently, when the double-layered elastomer is used instead of a single-layered in the superstructure, the comfort level of the people living around the line is improved as up to 64% and the comfort level of the passengers is improved as up to 54%. In addition, in terms of the safety investigations of the buildings around the line, a meaningful decrease in vibrations greater than 70 Hz is observed and it is concluded that residential buildings could be built up to 5 m distance.

Özet

Demiryoluna bağlı titreşimler, yolcuların veya demiryolunun çevresinde yaşayan insanlar için bastırılması gereken en önemli sorunlardan biridir. Titreşimlerin öncelikle kaynakta, yani demiryolu üzerinde bastırılmaya çalışılması esastır. Bu nedenle, demiryolu üst yapı bileşenleri, titreşim yalıtımında kullanılan ray pedleri gibi çeşitli elastik elemanlar içerir. Bu çalışmada, İstanbul demiryolu trafiğinde kullanılan iki farklı demiryolu üst yapısı, demiryolu aracı çeşitli hızlarda geçerken test edildi ve tekerlek-ray etkileşiminin oluşturduğu titreşimler, yolcu konforu ve çevre ile ilgili standartlara uygun olarak karşılaştırıldı. Yayılan titreşimleri karşılaştırmak için aynı hat üzerinde yerleştirilmiş tek ve çift elastomerik tabakalara sahip demiryolu üstyapıları kullanılmıştır. Standartlara göre bazı değerlendirmeler içeren bu deneysel kıyaslama çalışmasında, bu iki demiryolu üst yapı tipinin hafif metro hatlarında titreşim yalıtımı açısından davranışları ölçüm sonuçları kullanılarak ortaya konmuştur. Sonuç olarak, üstyapıda tek katman yerine çift katmanlı elastomer kullanıldığında, hat çevresinde yaşayan insanların konfor seviyelerinde %64’e, araç içerisinde bulunan yolcuların konfor seviyelerinde ise %54 varan iyileşme gerçekleşmiştir. Ayrıca, hat çevresinde bulunan binaların güvenliği bakımından yapılan araştırmada 70 HZ’den büyük titreşimlerde anlamlı bir azalma gözlenmiş ve hatta en az 5 m mesafeye kadar konut amaçlı bina yapılabileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULU, A., METIN, M. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Two Different Light Rail Superstructures in Istanbul Traffic in Terms of Vibration. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 589–607. https://ajindex.com/articles/494221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Metro İstanbul A.Ş. (2018, March 18). Hakkimizda. [Online]. Available:
  2. J. A. Forrest, "Modelling of ground vibration from underground railways," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1999
  3. A. Garinei, G. Risitano, L. Scappaticci, and F. J. M. Castellani, "An optimized method to evaluate the performance of trench isolation for railway-induced vibration," Measurement, vol. 94, pp. 92-102, 2016
  4. D. Connolly, A. Giannopoulos, W. Fan, P. Woodward, M. J. C. Forde, and B. Materials, "Optimising low acoustic impedance back-fill material wave barrier dimensions to shield structures from ground borne high speed rail vibrations," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 44, pp. 557-564, 2013
  5. N. Hamdan, O. Laghrouche, P. K. Woodward, M. J. C. Mahmood, and B. Materials, "Ground vibration reduction analysis using a frequency-domain finite element approach," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 92, pp. 95-103, 2015
  6. A. Dijckmans et al., "Mitigation of railway induced ground vibration by heavy masses next to the track," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 75, pp. 158-170, 2015
  7. Y. J. M. Dere, "Effectiveness of the floating slab track system constructed at Konya Light Rail," Measurement, vol. 89, pp. 48-54, 2016
  8. F. Cui and C. J. A. A. Chew, "The effectiveness of floating slab track system—Part I. Receptance methods," Applied Acoustics, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 441-453, 2000
  9. M. Sol-Sánchez, F. Moreno-Navarro, M. C. J. C. Rubio-Gámez, and b. materials, "The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: A state of the art review," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 75, pp. 293-305, 2015
  10. W. Ferdous, A. Manalo, G. Van Erp, T. Aravinthan, S. Kaewunruen, and A. J. C. S. Remennikov, "Composite railway sleepers–Recent developments, challenges and future prospects," Composite Structures, vol. 134, pp. 158-168, 2015
  11. K. Knothe and S. J. V. s. d. Grassie, "Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies," Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 209-262, 1993
  12. D. I. f. Normung, "DIN 4150-2: Structural vibrations–Part 2: Human exposure to vibration in buildings," German Standards Organization (GSO) Berlin, 1999
  13. G. S. DIN, Structural vibration Part 3: Effects of vibration on Structures, 1999
  14. I.-J. I. O. f. Standardization, Mechanical vibration and shock-Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration-Part 1: Genera