SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Root Morphology and Root Canal Configuration of Mandibular and Maxillary Premolar Teeth In Turkish Subpopulation By Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Hüseyin GÜNDÜZ
Esin ÖZLEK
Pages
465–471
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of this study, in maxillary first premolars, 64.5% two roots, 87.7% two canals, and 67.8% Type Ⅳ canal configuration; in maxillary second premolars 77.3% one root, 50.4% one canal, and 50.4 Type Ⅰ canal configuration; in mandibular first premolars 89.9% one root, 76.9% one canal, and 76.9% Type Ⅰcanal configuration; and in mandibular second premolars 98.4% one root, 95.9% one canal, and 95.9% Type Ⅰcanal configuration were observed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the root morphology and root canal configuration of the lower and upper premolars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), according to gender and right-left position of the tooth in the Turkish subpopulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the evaluation of root canal anatomy of mandibular and maxillary premolar teeth, 494 patients were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of this study, in maxillary first premolars, 64.5% two roots, 87.7% two canals, and 67.8% Type Ⅳ canal configuration; in maxillary second premolars 77.3% one root, 50.4% one canal, and 50.4 Type Ⅰ canal configuration; in mandibular first premolars 89.9% one root, 76.9% one canal, and 76.9% Type Ⅰcanal configuration; and in mandibular second premolars 98.4% one root, 95.9% one canal, and 95.9% Type Ⅰcanal configuration were observed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the root morphology and root canal configuration of the lower and upper premolars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), according to gender and right-left position of the tooth in the Turkish subpopulation. For the evaluation of root canal anatomy of mandibular and maxillary premolar teeth, 494 patients were used. In total, 3,880 premolar teeth were evaluated. CBCT images were examined in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. Number of roots, canals, and canal configurations of the teeth were determined according to Vertucci's classification. Qualitative data were analysed with Chi-square, Fisher Exact, and Bonferroni tests (α=0.05%). According to the results of this study, in maxillary first premolars, 64.5% two roots, 87.7% two canals, and 67.8% Type Ⅳ canal configuration; in maxillary second premolars 77.3% one root, 50.4% one canal, and 50.4 Type Ⅰ canal configuration; in mandibular first premolars 89.9% one root, 76.9% one canal, and 76.9% Type Ⅰcanal configuration; and in mandibular second premolars 98.4% one root, 95.9% one canal, and 95.9% Type Ⅰcanal configuration were observed. No statistically significant effect of the tooth position (right, left) on the number of roots, canals, and canal configuration in maxillary and mandibular premolars was observed (p>0.05). Maxillary second premolar and mandibular first premolars showed a statistically significant effect on number of roots, canals, and canal configuration by gender (p=0.00, p=0.032). In addition, gender had a significant effect on number of roots in maxillary first premolars (p=0.017).

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDÜZ, H., ÖZLEK, E. (2022). Evaluation of Root Morphology and Root Canal Configuration of Mandibular and Maxillary Premolar Teeth In Turkish Subpopulation By Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 465–471. https://ajindex.com/articles/494163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;28:419–25
  2. Paes Da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM, Rice Dt, Ordinola-Zapata R et al. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro–computed tomographic imaging. J Endod 2014;40:42–5
  3. Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, et al. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2012;45:996–1003
  4. Martins JNR, Marques D, Silva EJNL, Caramês J, Mata A, Versiani MA. Second root and second root canal prevalence in maxillary first and second premolars assessed by cone beam computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent e Cir Maxilofac 2019;60:37–50
  5. Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J. Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J 2004;37:494–9
  6. Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2008;41:240–8
  7. Pedemonte E, Cabrera C, Torres A, et al. Root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars using cone-beam computed tomography in a Chilean and Belgian subpopulation: a cross-sectional study. Oral Radiol 2018;34:143–50
  8. Patel S, Dawood A, Pitt Ford T, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007;40:818–30
  9. Ertaş ET, Arslan H, Çapar İD, Gök T, Ertaş H. Endodontide konik işinli bilgisayarli tomografi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekim Fakültesi Derg 2015;24:113–8
  10. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium– enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod 2010;36:1547–51
  11. Bulut DG, Kose E, Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Canger EM, Sisman Y. Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2015;9:551–7
  12. Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E. A cone-beam computed tomog