SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Determination and Presence of Mosquito Species and Invasive Aedes Species in Istanbul

İstanbul’da Sivrisinek Türleri ile İnvaziv Aedes Türlerinin Tespiti ve Bulunma Oranları

Sevcan ÖZTEMİZ
Ali Rıza EDE
Pages
321–327
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found by determining females obtained from larvae and pupae collected by dipper from mosquito breeding sources and females obtained from light traps and was conducted in 2019 and 2020.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to determine the incidence rates of mosquito species and invasive Aedes species in 27 districts of Istanbul (Arnavutköy, Avcılar, Başakşehir, Beşiktaş, Beylikdüzü, Büyükçekmece, Çatalca, Esenler, Esenyurt, Eyüpsultan, Gaziosmanpaşa, Kağıthane, Küçükçekmece, Sarıyer, Silivri, Sultangazi on the Anatolian side, Ataşehir, Beykoz, Kartal, Maltepe, Pendik, Sancaktepe, Sultanbeyli, Şile, Tuzla, Ümraniye, Üsküdar).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was found by determining females obtained from larvae and pupae collected by dipper from mosquito breeding sources and females obtained from light traps and was conducted in 2019 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering their vector potential a control program should be established against Aedes species, which have become widespread in our country.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:bulunma oranı · invaziv · İstanbul

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the incidence rates of mosquito species and invasive Aedes species in 27 districts of Istanbul (Arnavutköy, Avcılar, Başakşehir, Beşiktaş, Beylikdüzü, Büyükçekmece, Çatalca, Esenler, Esenyurt, Eyüpsultan, Gaziosmanpaşa, Kağıthane, Küçükçekmece, Sarıyer, Silivri, Sultangazi on the Anatolian side, Ataşehir, Beykoz, Kartal, Maltepe, Pendik, Sancaktepe, Sultanbeyli, Şile, Tuzla, Ümraniye, Üsküdar). It was found by determining females obtained from larvae and pupae collected by dipper from mosquito breeding sources and females obtained from light traps and was conducted in 2019 and 2020. In the study, 13 mosquito species belonging to 4 genera were determined. Mosquito species found in a total of 247 breeding sources and their incidence were determined as Culex pipiens L. 45.4%, Aedes albopictus (Skuse) 20%, Aedes cretinus (Edwards) 9%, Anopheles maculipennis complex (except Anopheles sacharovi) 5.2% Culex territians 4%, Anopheles claviger (Meigen) 2.8%, Aedes vexans (Meigen) 2.4% Culex theileri Theobald 2.4%, Culiseta annulata (Schrank)2%, Culex hortensis Ficalbi1.6%, Culex modestus Ficalbi 1.6%Culex torrentium Martini2.4%, Culiseta longiareolata (Macquart)1.2%, Culex sp. (Diptera Culicidae). Aedes albopictus L. and Aedes cretinus (Skuse) were identified as invasive species. Considering their vector potential a control program should be established against Aedes species, which have become widespread in our country.

Özet

Çalışmada İstanbul’un 27 ilçesinde (Avrupa yakasında Arnavutköy, Avcılar, Başakşehir, Beşiktaş, Beylikdüzü, Büyükçekmece, Çatalca, Esenler, Esenyurt, Eyüpsultan, Gaziosmanpaşa, Kağıthane, Küçükçekmece, Sarıyer, Silivri, Sultangazi, Anadolu yakasında Ataşehir, Beykoz, Kartal, Maltepe, Pendik, Sancaktepe, Sultanbeyli, Şile, Tuzla, Ümraniye, Üsküdar) sivrisinek türleri ile invaziv Aedes türleri (Diptera: Culicidae)’nin bulunma oranlarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma, sivrisinek üreme kaynaklarından dipper aracılığıyla toplanan larva ve pupalardan elde edilen dişiler ile ışık tuzaklarından elde edilen dişilerin tespiti ile yapılmış olup 2019 ve 2020 yıllarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada 4 cinse ait 13 sivrisinek türü belirlenmiştir. Toplam 247 üreme kaynağında bulunan sivrisinek türleri ve bulunma oranları, Culex pipiens L. %45.4,Aedes albopictus (Skuse) %20, Aedes cretinus (Edwards) %9, Anopheles maculipennis kompleks (Anopheles sacharovi hariç) %5.2 Culex territians %4, Anopheles claviger (Meigen) %2.8 Aedes vexans (Meigen) %2.4, Culex theileri Theobald %2.4, Culiseta annulata (Schrank)%2, Culex hortensis Ficalbi%1.6, Culex modestus Ficalbi%1.6, Culex torrentium Martini%2.4, Culiseta longiareolata (Macquart)%1.2, Culex sp. (Diptera: Culicidae) olarak tespit edilmiştir. İstilacı tür olarak, Aedes albopictus(Skuse) ve Aedes cretinus(Edwards) saptanmıştır. Vektörlük potansiyelleri dikkate alındığında Ülkemizde yaygın hale gelen Aedes türleri ile mücadele programı oluşturulmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTEMİZ, S., EDE, A. R. (2022). Determination and Presence of Mosquito Species and Invasive Aedes Species in Istanbul. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 321–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/494009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. B. Alten ve S. S. Çağlar,,Vektör Ekolojisi ve Mücadelesi, 1. baskı, Ankara, Türkiye: Sağlık Bakanlığı, 1998, ss. 249
  2. B. J. Beaty ve W. C. Marquardt, The Biology of Disease Vectors, Chicago, ABD: University Press Of Colorado, 1996, ss. 450
  3. R. E. Harbach ve L. J. Kitching, “Reconsideration of anopheline mosquito phylogeny (Diptera: Culicidae: Anophelinae) based on morphological data,” Syst Biodiversit, c.3, s. 4, ss. 345-374, 2005
  4. G. Wang, C. Li, X. Guo,, D. Xing, Y. Dong, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, M. Liu, Z. Zheng, H. Zhang, X. Zhu, Z. Wu ve T. Zhao, “Identifying the main mosquito species in China based on DNA barcoding,” Plos One, c. 7,ss. 1-11, 2012
  5. R. Wilkerson, Y-M. Linton, D. Fonseca, T. Schultz, D. Price ve D. Strickman, “Making mosquito taxonomy useful: a stable classification of tribe aedini that balances utility with current knowledge of evolutionary relationships,” Plos One, c. 7, s. 10, ss. 1-26, 2015
  6. G. Benelli, “Spreas of Zika Virus: the key role of mosquito vector control,” Asian Pasific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, c. 6, ss. 468-471, 2016
  7. Anonim. (2019, 9 Aralık). World Health Organization 2017 Global malaria report, Geneva, Switzerland. [Online]. Erişim:
  8. N. Becker, D. Petric, M. Zgomba, C. Boase, C. Dahl, J. Lane ve A. Kaiser, Mosquitoes and Their Control, London, England: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London, 2003, ss. 498
  9. K. Öter, “İstanbul’da görülen sivrisinek türlerinin tespiti,” Doktora tezi, Parazitoloji, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2007
  10. B. Alten, S. S. Çağlar ve N. Özer, “Malaria and its Vectors in Turkey,” European Mosquito Bulletin, c. 7, ss. 27-33, 2000
  11. N. Becker, D. Petric, M. Zgomba, C. Boase, M. Madon, C. Dahl ve A. Kaiser, Mosquitoes and Their Control, 2. Edition, New York, USA: Springer, Heidelberg, New York, 2010, ss. 577
  12. R. F. Darsie ve A. Samanidou-Voyadjoglou, ‘Keys for the identification of the mosquitoes of Greece,’’ Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, c. 7, ss. 247–254, 1997
  13. A. Merdivenci, Türkiye Sivrisinekleri, İstanbul, Türkiye: İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları, 1984, ss. 355
  14. E. Schaffner, G. Angel, B. Geoffroy, J. P. Hervy, A. Rhaiem ve J. Brunhes, The Mosquitoes of Europe (CD-Rom), Montpellier, France:Institute de Resherche Pour le Développement (IRD), 2001
  15. M. M. Akiner, B. Demirc