SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

PROFILEOFSENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITYBASED ON GUARDIAN PERSONALITY TYPE

Muhamad Akrom
Triyanto
Farida Nurhasanah
Journal
IOJET
Pages
16–28
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is because the subject considers that the listed formula can be used in all types of triangles, does not know the rules of the cosine rule, the subject rarely practices and answers story questions, difficulties in linking the results obtained with questions, difficulty in choosing the formula to be used, and not careful in doing calculations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study targets to 1) describe students' mathematical reasoning skills in terms of guardian personality type; 2) knowing the causes of student mistakes in answering questions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The subjects in this study were students of class XI MIPA four Wanasaba 1 Senior High School in East Lombok in the 2020/2021 school year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is because the subject considers that the listed formula can be used in all types of triangles, does not know the rules of the cosine rule, the subject rarely practices and answers story questions, difficulties in linking the results obtained with questions, difficulty in choosing the formula to be used, and not careful in doing calculations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study targets to 1) describe students' mathematical reasoning skills in terms of guardian personality type; 2) knowing the causes of student mistakes in answering questions. This type of study is descriptive qualitative. The subjects in this study were students of class XI MIPA four Wanasaba 1 Senior High School in East Lombok in the 2020/2021 school year. The determination of the subject was done by purposive sampling and snowball. Data collection techniques used personality tests, tests of mathematical reasoning abilities, and interviews. The validation of each instrument was carried out by three experts in each field. The data analysis stage in this study was data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study indicate that the subject's mathematical reasoning ability only fulfills indicator 4, namely performing calculations based on certain rules or formulas. Subjects have not been able to meet other indicators. This is because the subject considers that the listed formula can be used in all types of triangles, does not know the rules of the cosine rule, the subject rarely practices and answers story questions, difficulties in linking the results obtained with questions, difficulty in choosing the formula to be used, and not careful in doing calculations

🔖

Cite This Article

Akrom, M., Triyanto, T., Nurhasanah, F. (2022). PROFILEOFSENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITYBASED ON GUARDIAN PERSONALITY TYPE. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 16–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/493084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agustyaningrum, N., Hanggara, Y., Husna, A., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudii, A. (2019). An Analysis Of Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability On Abstract Algebra Course. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 2800–2805.
  2. Arini, Z., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2016). Profil Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kepribadian Extrovert dan Introvert. MATHEdunesa, 2(5), 127–136.
  3. Ayuningtyas, W., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2019). Analysis of Student’s Geometry Reasoning Ability at Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012016
  4. Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 tahun 2006. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Fisher, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability Analysis in Systems of Linear Equations and Applications. International Seminar on Applied Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1315(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012044
  5. Hasanah, U., Wahyu, R., & Putra, Y. (2017). Analisis Proses Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Rational dan Artisan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 137–149.
  6. Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hard Skills dan Soft Skills Matematik Siswa. Bandung: Refika Aditama.Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Elemen, 6(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i1.1738
  7. Karunika, A. M., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2019). Profile of MathematicalReasoning Ability of Female Students Based on Self-Efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1265(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1265/1/012008
  8. Mariyam, M., & Wahyuni, R. (2016). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Melalui Problem Centered Learning Pada Materi Peluang (Studi Eksperimen Di Kelas VIII SMP N 6 Singkawang). JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 1(2), 74-8-. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i2.86
  9. Nahdi, D. S. (2015). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir KritisDan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Brain Based Learning. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v1i1.341
  10. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. United States of America: NCTM. Putra, R. W. Y. (2017). Analisis Proses Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Memecahkan Ma