SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Ev meleklerı: Dıckens ın Viktoryen Kadınları

Angels of the house: Dickens' Victorian Women

Aşkın Haluk YILDIRIM
Pages
113–125
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through the insight provided in the article, it is concluded that despite Dickens overall faith in theAngel of the House concept, his fiction does not strictly follow the gender codes of the period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article explores Charles Dickens view of Victorian women and the effect of his perception of women on his creation of female characters in his novels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, the gender issues in the Victorian era are presented along with the social reforms and industrial revolution in terms of their impact on the status of women in 19th century Victorian England.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through the insight provided in the article, it is concluded that despite Dickens overall faith in theAngel of the House concept, his fiction does not strictly follow the gender codes of the period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article explores Charles Dickens view of Victorian women and the effect of his perception of women on his creation of female characters in his novels. To this end, the gender issues in the Victorian era are presented along with the social reforms and industrial revolution in terms of their impact on the status of women in 19th century Victorian England. The role of actual female figures in Dickens personal life is also examined in order to provide an insight into the motives and inspirations behind his creation of female characters. In view of the detailed account given as to the time period and background information provided, the main issue discussed in the article is the extent of Dickens conformity with the Victorian ideology of women in his novels. Through the insight provided in the article, it is concluded that despite Dickens overall faith in theAngel of the House concept, his fiction does not strictly follow the gender codes of the period.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, Charles Dickensın Viktoryen kadınına bakışını ve kadına dair algısının romanlarındaki kadın karakterlerin yaratılma sürecine etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla, Viktoryen dönemdeki cinsiyet meselelerinin yanı sıra sosyal reformların ve sanayi devriminin 19. yy. Viktoryen İngilteresinde kadının statüsüne etkileri tartışılmaktadır. Dickensın kadın karakterlerini oluşturma sürecindeki itkileri ve ilham kaynakları konusunda bir içgörü sağlaması amacıyla gerçek kadın figürlerin Dickensın özel hayatındaki rolü de irdelenmiştir. Döneme ilişkin olarak sunulan ayrıntılı tanımların ve artalan bilgisinin ışığında makalede tartışılan temel konu Dickensın romanlarının Viktoryen kadın ideolojisiyle ne derece örtüştüğüdür. Makalede sağlanan içgörü sonuç olarak göstermektedir ki Dickens her ne kadar Viktoryen kadın ideolojisine genel anlamda bağlı olsa da eserlerine dönemin cinsiyet kurallarını katı şekilde yansıtmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, A. H. (2022). Ev meleklerı: Dıckens ın Viktoryen Kadınları. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 113–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/491679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abrams, M. H. (Ed.) (1993). The Norton anthology of English literature, Vol. 2, 6th Edition. New York: W.W. Norton. Ayres, B. (1998). Dissenting women in Dickens’ novels: the subversion of domestic ideology. West Port: Greenwood Press.
  2. Barrickman, R., MacDonald, S. and Stark, M. (1982). Corrupt relations: Dickens, Thackeray, Trollope, Collins and the Victorian sexual system. New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. Crawford, E. (1999). The women’s suffrage movement: a reference guide 1866-1928. London: UCL Press.
  4. Cruickshank, R. J. (1949). Charles Dickens and early Victorian England. New York: Chanticleer Press.
  5. Dickens, C. (1962). Oliver Twist, 3rd Edition. New York: Washington Square Press.
  6. Dickens, C. (2007a). The life and adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit. The Pennsylvania State University: Electronic Classics Series Publication. Dickens, C. (2007b). The life and adventures of Nicholas Nickleby. The Pennsylvania State University: Electronic Classics Series Publication. Dickens, C. (1985). Dombey and son. London: Penguin. Dickens, C. (1999).
  7. David Copperfield, Volume I-II. The Pennsylvania State University: Electronic Classics Series Publication. Dickens, C. (1998).
  8. Bleak house, Stephen Gill (Ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Dickens, C. (2000). Little Dorrit. The Pennsylvania State University: Electronic Classics Series Publication. Dickens C. (1978).
  10. Great expectations, Angus Calder (Ed). New York: Penguin Books. Dickens, C. (2000). Our mutual friend. The Pennsylvania State University: Electronic Classics Series Publication. Hartley, J. (2008). Charles Dickens and the house of fallen women. London: Methuen. Hawes, D. (1998). Who's who in Dickens. London: Routledge. Holmes, A. S. (1995). The double standard in the English divorce laws, 1857–1923. Law & Social Inquiry, (20) 2: 601–620. Horrell, S. and Humphries, J. (1995). Women's labour force participation and the transition to the male-breadwinner family, 1790-1865. The Economic History Review, (48) 1: 89-117.
  11. Kent, S. (1990). Sex and suffrage in Britain 1860-1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  12. King, P. (1991). Customary rights and women's earnings: The importance of gleaning to the rural labouring poor, 1750-1850. The Economic History Review, (44) 3: 461-476.
  13. Lohrli, A. (1973). Household words: a weekly journal 1850-1859 conducted by Charles Dickens. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  14. Margolyes, M. and Fraser, S. (2012). Dickens' women. New York: Hesperus Press.
  15. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1