Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 6

Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: a phantom study

Pages
442–450
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the same radiation dose, the low-dose CT image quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the quality of chest computed tomography (CT) images obtained with low-dose CT using three iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS Two 64-detector spiral CT scanners (HDCT and iCT) were used to scan a chest phantom containing 6 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) at 11 radiation dose levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the same radiation dose, the low-dose CT image quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the quality of chest computed tomography (CT) images obtained with low-dose CT using three iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. METHODS Two 64-detector spiral CT scanners (HDCT and iCT) were used to scan a chest phantom containing 6 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) at 11 radiation dose levels. CT images were reconstructed by filtered back projection or three IR algorithms. Reconstructed images were analyzed for CT values, average noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, subjective image noise, and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Average noise decreased and CNR increased with increasing radiation dose when the same reconstruction algorithm was applied. Average image noise was significantly lower when reconstructed with MBIR than with iDOSE4 at the same low radiation doses. The two radiologists showed good interobserver consistency in image quality with kappa 0.83. A significant relationship was found between image noise and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. CONCLUSION Three IR algorithms are able to reduce the image noise and improve the image quality of low-dose CT. In the same radiation dose, the low-dose CT image quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.

🔖

Cite This Article

XU, Y., HOU, H., XU, Z., HE, W., ZHANG, T., HU, Z., Lİ, J. (2022). Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: a phantom study. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 6, 442–450. https://ajindex.com/articles/487285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kraft M, Ibrahim M, Spector M, Forghani R, Srinivasan A. Comparison of virtual monochromatic series, iodine overlay maps, and single energy CT equivalent images in head and neck cancer conspicuity. Clin Imaging 2018
  2. 26–31. [CrossRef] 2. Nagai H, Kim YH. Cancer prevention from the perspective of global cancer burden patterns. J Thorac Dis 2017
  3. 448–451. [CrossRef] 3. Wang L, Yu C, Liu Y, Wang J, Li C, Wang Q, et al. Lung cancer mortality trends in china from 1988 to 2013: new challenges and opportunities for the government. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016
  4. E1052. [CrossRef] 4. Law M, Ma WK, Lau D, Chan E, Yip L, Lam W. Cumulative radiation exposure and associated cancer risk estimates for scoliosis patients: Impact of repetitive full spine radiography. Eur J Radiol 2016
  5. 625–628. [CrossRef] 5. Farioli A, Ottone M, Morganti AG, et al. Radiation-induced mesothelioma among long-term solid cancer survivors: a longitudinal analysis of SEER database. Cancer Med 2016
  6. 950–959. [CrossRef] 6. Kim H, Park CM, Chae HD, Lee SM, Goo JM. Impact of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on pulmonary nodule measurements at chest CT: a phantom study. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015
  7. 459–465. [CrossRef] 7. Siegel MJ, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Hildebolt C, Bradley D, Schmidt B. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality. Invest Radiol 2013
  8. 584–589. [CrossRef] 8. Schindera ST, Winklehner A, Alkadhi H, et al. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study. Clin Radiol 2013
  9. e79–86. [CrossRef] 9. Christner JA, Zavaletta VA, Eusemann CD, Walz-Flannigan AI, McCollough CH. Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
  10. W49–55. [CrossRef] 10. Kang EJ, Lee KN, Kim DW, et al. Triple rule-out acute chest pain evaluation using a 320-row-detector volume CT: a comparison of the wide-volume and helical modes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012
  11. 28(Suppl 1):7–13. [CrossRef] 11. Prezzi D, Goh V, Virdi S, Mallett S, Grierson C, Breen DJ. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction improves image quality without affecting perfusion CT quantitation in primary colorectal cancer. Eur J Radiol Open 2017
  12. 69–74. [CrossRef] 12. Sorantin E, Riccabona M, Stucklschweiger G, Guss H, Fotter R. Experience with vol