Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6

Scheduling surgery after transarterial embolization: does timing make any difference to intraoperative blood loss for renal cell carcinoma bone metastases?

Pages
740–745
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION Bone metastases of RCC are well-vascularized, and to achieve lowest IBL values, surgery should preferably be performed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE Our purpose is to clarify the optimal timing of surgery after transarterial embolization (TAE) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) bone metastases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS This retrospective study included 41 patients with RCC bone metastases embolized between 2013 and 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION Bone metastases of RCC are well-vascularized, and to achieve lowest IBL values, surgery should preferably be performed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE Our purpose is to clarify the optimal timing of surgery after transarterial embolization (TAE) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) bone metastases. METHODS This retrospective study included 41 patients with RCC bone metastases embolized between 2013 and 2019. Different-sized particulate and/or liquid embolic agents were used for TAE. Embolizations were categorized into groups 1–3 according to the interval between TAE and surgery (group 1: 3 days). Degree of embolization after TAE was graded visually based on angiographic images (90%). The relationship between the TAE–surgery interval and intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and the correlation between IBL and embolization grade were examined. Lesion sizes and the relationships among lesion localizations and contrast media usage, intervention time, and IBL were also analyzed. RESULTS Forty-six pre-operative TAEs (single lesion at each session) were performed in this study (26 in group 1, 13 in group 2, 7 in group 3). Lesion sizes and distributions were similar between groups (p = 0.897); >75% devascularization was achieved in 40 (TAEs 86.96%), but the IBL showed no correlation with the embolization rate (r=0.032, p = 0.831). The TAE–surgery interval was 1–7 days. The median IBL in group 1 (750 mL; range, 150–3000 mL) was significantly lower than those in the other groups (p = 0.002). Contrast media usage (p = 0.482) and intervention times (p = 0.261) were similar for metastases at different localizations. IBL values after TAE were lower for extremity metastases (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Bone metastases of RCC are well-vascularized, and to achieve lowest IBL values, surgery should preferably be performed

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEBİOĞLU, E. C., BAŞARIR, K., YILDIZ, H. Y., KARACA, M. O., MERTER, A., BİLGİÇ, S. (2022). Scheduling surgery after transarterial embolization: does timing make any difference to intraoperative blood loss for renal cell carcinoma bone metastases?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 740–745. https://ajindex.com/articles/487277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019
  2. 74–84. [Crossref] 2. Chatziioannou AN, Johnson ME, Pneumaticos SG, et al. Preoperative embolization of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2000
  3. 593–596. [Crossref] 3. Fottner A, Szalantzy M, Wirthmann L, et al. Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010
  4. [Crossref] 4. Grünwald V, Eberhardt B, Bex A, et al. An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Nature Rev Urol 2018
  5. 511–521. [Crossref] 5. Sun S. Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: preoperative embolization. In: Golzarian J, Sun S, Sharafuddin MJ, eds. Vascular Embolotherapy Medical Radiology (Diagnostic Imaging). Heidelberg: Springer, 2006:189–199. [Crossref] 6. Barton PP, Waneck ER, Karnel JF, et al. Embolization of bone metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996
  6. 81–88. [Crossref] 7. Feldman F, Casarella WJ, Dick HM, et al. Selective intraarterial embolization of bone tumors. A useful adjunct in the management of selected lesions. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975
  7. 130–139. [Crossref] 8. Geraets SEW, Bos PK, Van der Stok J. Preoperative embolization in surgical treatment of long bone metastasis: a systematic literature review. EFORT Open Reviews 2020
  8. 17–25. [Crossref] 9. Aggarwal V, Bhardwaj R, Thakur RK. Is pre-operative angio-embolisation an effective modality to control intraoperative blood loss in extremity bone tumors? JMSCR 2017
  9. 27578–27586. [Crossref] 10. Kato S, Hozumi T, Takaki Y, et al. Optimal schedule of preoperative embolization for spinal metastasis surgery. Spine 2013
  10. 1964–1969. [Crossref] 11. Kumar N, Tan B, Zaw AS, et al. The role of preoperative vascular embolization in surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Eur Spine J 2016
  11. 3962–3970. [Crossref] 12. Gellad FE, Sadato N, Numaguchi Y, et al. Vascular metastatic lesions of the spine: preoperative embolization. Radiology 1990
  12. 683–686. [Crossref] 13. Mavrogenis AF, Rossi G, Rimondi E, et al. Embolization of bone tumors. Orthopedics 2011
  13. 303–310. [Crossref] 14. Chu JP, Chen W, Li JP, et al. Clinicopathological features and results of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for osteosarcoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007
  14. 201–206. [Crossref] 15. Ghobriala G M, Chalouhia N, Harropa J, et al. Preoperative spinal tumor embolization: An institutio