Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Explicating the situated nature of teachers' attitudes toward technology-assisted language teaching

Pages
179–194
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate significant correlations between teachers‟ attitudes and their computer perceptions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of computer-based technologies has been dominating the shape of the latest reforms in the field of education as well as other fields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To comply with the changes in this transformation, teachers need to develop and/or adopt new teaching approaches, methodologies, and strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate significant correlations between teachers‟ attitudes and their computer perceptions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The use of computer-based technologies has been dominating the shape of the latest reforms in the field of education as well as other fields. To comply with the changes in this transformation, teachers need to develop and/or adopt new teaching approaches, methodologies, and strategies. One of the factors influencing the success of implementing technology assisted teaching is teachers‟ attitudes. In this respect, this study aims to determine the stages that English Language teachers experience in such transformation and the factors influencing their attitudes towards technology-assisted teaching during this process. The data for the study were collected from 36 teachers at School of Foreign Languages at Cukurova University via Attitudes Towards Computer Technology Questionnaire adapted from Albirini (2006) and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The results indicate significant correlations between teachers‟ attitudes and their computer perceptions. The overall findings implicate that an implementation of a technology-assisted teaching requires taking into account the factors specific to the application situation.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, M., OKAN, Z. (2022). Explicating the situated nature of teachers' attitudes toward technology-assisted language teaching. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 179–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/485612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abrams, Z. I. (2002), Surfing to Cross-cultural Awareness: Using Internet-Mediated Projects to Explore Cultural Stereotypes. Foreign Language Annals, 35(2), 141-160.
  2. Albirini, A. (2006), Teachers‟ Attitudes toward Information and Communication Technologies: The case of Syrian EFL Teachers, Computers & Education, 47, 373-398.
  3. Al-Jarf, R. (2004), The Effects of Web-Based Learning on Struggling EFL College Writers, Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 49-57.
  4. Al-Khaldi, M. A. and Al-Jabri, I.M. (1998), The Relationship of Attitudes to Computer Utilization: New Evidence from a Developing Nation, Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 23-42.
  5. Beauvois, M. H. (1994), E-Talk: Attitudes and Motivation in Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion, Computers and the Humanities, 28(1), 177-190.
  6. Blasszauer, J. (2001), Collaborative Projects via the Internet, Teaching English with Technology: A Journal for teachers of English, 1(6), 1-7.
  7. Brandl, K. (2002), Integrating Internet-based Reading Materials into the Foreign Language Curriculum: From Teacher-to-student-centered Approaches, Language Learning Technology, 6(3), 87-107.
  8. Brown, H.D. (1994), Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. NJ, USA: Prentice Hall Regents. Bullock, D. (2004), Moving from Theory to Practice: An Examination of the Factors that Preservice Teachers Encounter as They Attempt to Gain Experience Teaching with Technology in Field Placement Experiences, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.
  9. Chapelle, C. A. (2004), Technology and Second Language Learning: Expanding Methods and Agendas, System, 32, 593-601.
  10. Chun, D. C. & Payne, J. S. (2004), What Makes Students Click: Working Memory and Look-up Behavior. System, 32(4), 593-601.
  11. Everett, D. R. & Ahern, T. C. (1994), Computer-Mediated Communication as a Teaching Tool: A Case Study, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 336-357.
  12. Farnhill, D. (1985), A Comparison of Hypnosis and Computer-assisted Biofeedback in Computer Anxiety Reduction, Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnothesis, 13, 31-35.
  13. Francis, L. Katz, Y., and Jones, S. (2000), The Reliability and Validity of the Hebrew Version of the Computer Attitude Scale, Computers & Education, 35(2), 149-159.
  14. Freeman, D. (1989),
  15. Teacher Training, Development, and Decision Making: A Model of Teaching and Related Strategies for Language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 27-45.
  16. Hall, L. A. (2005), Teachers and Content Area Reading: Attitudes, Beliefs and Cha