SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 37

Acquisition,development and assessment of learner autonomy

Feryal ÇUBUKÇU
Pages
46–53
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, the metacognitive theory will be given more importance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Different theories try to explain why some students are more successful than the others.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Phenomenologists (Mc Combs, 1989) study self concepts of the students and find such students prone to achieve more.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, the metacognitive theory will be given more importance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Different theories try to explain why some students are more successful than the others. Phenomenologists (Mc Combs, 1989) study self concepts of the students and find such students prone to achieve more. Attributional Theorists (Dweck, 1986) focus on personal outcome such as effort or ability. Metacognitive theorists (Pressley, 1990) examine students’ self regulated learning strategies whereas Constructivists (Paris & Byrnes,1989) believe supportive environments are important to be successful. In this paper, the metacognitive theory will be given more importance.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUBUKÇU, F. (2022). Acquisition,development and assessment of learner autonomy. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 37, 46–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/484823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Bandura, A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall Bandura, A. (1991) Social Cognitive Theory of Self Regulation. Organizational Human Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,248-287.
  2. Benware, C & Deci,E (1984) Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Sets. American Educational Research Journal, 21,755-765.
  3. Borkowski, J& Thorpe,P (1994) Life Span Perspective on Underachievment in Self Regulation of Learning and Performance ed. by Dale Schunk and Barry Zimmerman NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Chan, V. (2001) Learning Autonomously: The Learners’ Perspectives. Journal of Furtherand Higher Education, Vol. 25, No. 3,285-297
  4. Dweck, C. S. (1986)Motivational Processes Affecting Learning. The American Psychologist, 41, 1040 - 1048. Krouse, J. H. &Krouse, H. J. (1981) Toward a Multimodal Theory of Academic Underachievement. Educational Psychologist,16,151-164.
  5. Mc Combs, B. (1989) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. New York: Springer-Verlag. Meece, J (1994) The Role of Motivation in Self Regulated Leraning in Self Regulation of Learning and Performance ed by Dale Schunk and Barry Zimmerman NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Paris, S. G. & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). 'The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom.' In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self- regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 169-200). New York:Springer-Verlag. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research Vol III. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum. Schunk, D & Zimmerman, B (1994). Self Regulation of Learning and Performance. NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Zimmerman, B.J (1986) Development of Self Regulated Learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology,16,307-313
  6. Zimmerman, B.J. & Martinez –Pons, M (1988) Construct Validation of a Strategy Model of Student Self Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,73, 485-493.