Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Enriching a preservice teacher’s classroom experiences through cycles of teaching and reflection

Pages
41–52
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that preservice teachers benefit from multiple cycles of planning, implementing, and reflecting on their teaching, in stages of increasing awareness, under the supervision of their professors and experienced teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study adds momentum to the ongoing teacher education discussion by observing a preservice teacher’s development and implementation of a lesson plan in a high school classroom.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The consequences of his lack of teaching experience and incomplete content knowledge on his pedagogical content knowledge were observed during his planning and teaching of a lesson to a group of high school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that preservice teachers benefit from multiple cycles of planning, implementing, and reflecting on their teaching, in stages of increasing awareness, under the supervision of their professors and experienced teachers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study adds momentum to the ongoing teacher education discussion by observing a preservice teacher’s development and implementation of a lesson plan in a high school classroom. The consequences of his lack of teaching experience and incomplete content knowledge on his pedagogical content knowledge were observed during his planning and teaching of a lesson to a group of high school students. Although his experience in this study did not substantially alter his content and pedagogical content knowledge, he gained experience in preparing and teaching a lesson. The results indicate that preservice teachers benefit from multiple cycles of planning, implementing, and reflecting on their teaching, in stages of increasing awareness, under the supervision of their professors and experienced teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

HACIÖMEROĞLU, G. (2022). Enriching a preservice teacher’s classroom experiences through cycles of teaching and reflection. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 41–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/484801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Artzt, A. F. (1999). A structure to enable preservice teachers of mathematics to reflect on their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 143-166.
  2. Ball, D.L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that preservice teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.
  3. Ball, D.L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 433–456).
  4. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Ball, D.L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 437-449).
  5. New York, NY: MacMillan. Blanton, M. L., Berenson, S. B. & Norwood, K. S. (2001). Exploring a pedagogy for the supervision of prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 177–204.
  6. Borko, H. & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(5), 505-518.
  7. Bowman, N. (1979). College supervision of student teaching: A time to reconsider. Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 29–30.
  8. Cooney, T.J. (1996). Mathematics, pedagogy, and secondary teacher education: Developing a topic across the curriculum: Functions. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Even, R. (1989). Preservice secondary teachers’ knowledge and understanding about mathematical functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, USA. Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 521-554.
  9. Even, R. (1993). Subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Preservice secondary teachers and the functions concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 94-116.
  10. Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 1-20.
  11. Fernandez, M.L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26, 37-47.
  12. Frykholm, J. A. (1996). Pre-Service teachers in mathematics: Struggling with the standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 665-681.
  13. Frykholm, J. A. (1998). Beyond supervision: Learning to teach mathematics in community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(3), 305-322. G