SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Development of the Parentified Child Scale-Adult Version: A Reliability and Validity Study

Tolga ZENCİR
Özlem HASKAN-AVCI
Pages
531–553
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the Parentified Child Scale Adult Version (PCS-A) scale consists of two sub-scales and the first sub-scale has four factors and the second sub-scale has one factor through explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop a scalethat can measure parentification levels for adults in a valid and reliable way.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 705 people (510 females, 195 males) participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the Parentified Child Scale Adult Version (PCS-A) scale consists of two sub-scales and the first sub-scale has four factors and the second sub-scale has one factor through explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to develop a scalethat can measure parentification levels for adults in a valid and reliable way. A total of 705 people (510 females, 195 males) participated in the study. The Filial Responsibility Scale-Adult Version developed by Jurkovic, Thirkield and Morel (2001), adopted to Turkish by Karagöbek (2014) was used for Convergent and Discrimant Validity. It was found that the Parentified Child Scale Adult Version (PCS-A) scale consists of two sub-scales and the first sub-scale has four factors and the second sub-scale has one factor through explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient of PCS-A is found as .88. The item total correlation coefficients were between .37 and .71. Confirmatory factor analysis of the first sub-scale of the scale shows that 22 items had four factors and the chi-square fit (2=506.42,df=203,p=.00)wassignificant.The 2/dfresultformodelfitwas determined to be 2.49. In addition, RMSEA = .073, CFI = .95, NFI = .92, NNFI = .94, IFI = .95, RFI.91 and GFI = .86 were calculated. The test-retest correlation coefficient was found to be .91. The relationship between the PCS-A and the FRS was analysed as .81. The results suggest that Parentified Child Scale-Adult Version is a valid and reliable instrument.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZENCİR, T., HASKAN-AVCI, Ö. (2022). Development of the Parentified Child Scale-Adult Version: A Reliability and Validity Study. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 531–553. https://ajindex.com/articles/484731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aldrich, J. O. & Cunningham, J. B. (2016). Using IBM SPSS statistics: an interactive hand-on approach.California: Sage Publications Inc. Aldridge, J., &Becker, S. (1993). Punishing children for caring: the hidden cost of young carers. Children & Society,7, 4, 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1993.tb00293.x
  2. Alexander, P. C. (2003). Parent-child role reversal: Development of a measure and test of an attachment theory model. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 22, 31-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.22.2.31.23349
  3. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables.John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. Boszormanyi-Nagy, I. & Spark, G. (1973).
  4. Invisible loyalties. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publications. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research.New York: Guilford. Burnett, G., Jones, R. A., Bliwise, N. G. and Ross, L. T. (2006). Family unpredictability, parental alcoholism, and the development of parentification. American Journal of Family Therapy,34: 181–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926180600550437
  5. Burton, L. (2007). Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: a conceptual model. Family Relations, 56, 4, 329-345.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x
  6. Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S. ve Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Byng-Hall, J. (2008). The significance of children fulfilling parental roles: Implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy30(2):147 –162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00423.x Chase, N. D. (1999). Burdened Children: Theory, Research, and Treatment of Parentification.California: Sage Publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452220604
  8. Chase, N. D., Deming, M. P. and Wells, M. C. (1998) Parentification, parental alcoholism, and academic status among young adults. American Journal of Family Therapy,26: 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189808251091
  9. Cliff, N. (1988).The eigenvalue-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin,103,276–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.276
  10. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum. Earley, L. & Cushway, D. (2002). The parentified child.Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry,7 (2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104502007002005
  11. Emre, O. (2016). Ebeveynleştirmenin Çocukların Gelişim Sürecine Etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bi