Journals / ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Some Waste and Soil Regulators on Worm Behavior in Soil

Bazı Atık ve Toprak Düzenleyicilerin Toprakta Solucan Davranışlarına Etkisi

Pages
79–86
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a consequence, it was established that the rate of control soil was preferred to other mediums, were statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the orientation status of worms into the soils (peat, perlite, organomineral fertilizer and tea waste) obtained by mixing different materials, was determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to datas, surface areas of channels opened by worms, were measured 23.53 cm2 in mixture of organomineral fertilizer, 24.26 cm2 in mixture of perlite, 35.76 cm2 in mixture of tea waste, 48.01 cm2 in mixture of peat and 83.92 cm2 in control (without mixture).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a consequence, it was established that the rate of control soil was preferred to other mediums, were statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the orientation status of worms into the soils (peat, perlite, organomineral fertilizer and tea waste) obtained by mixing different materials, was determined. With this purpose, total areas of tunnels opened by worms, were measured in between the soils mixed with different materials and control. According to datas, surface areas of channels opened by worms, were measured 23.53 cm2 in mixture of organomineral fertilizer, 24.26 cm2 in mixture of perlite, 35.76 cm2 in mixture of tea waste, 48.01 cm2 in mixture of peat and 83.92 cm2 in control (without mixture). As a consequence, it was established that the rate of control soil was preferred to other mediums, were statistically significant (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada, farklı materyaller (torf, perlit, organomineral gübre ve çay atığı) karıştırılarak elde edilmiş topraklara solucanların yönelim durumları belirlenmiştir. Bu amaçla, farklı materyal karıştırılmış topraklar ile kontrol toprağı arasına bırakılan solucanların açtıkları tünellerin toplam alanları ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen verilere göre, solucanların açtıkları kanalların yüzey alanları; organomineral gübreli karışımda 23,53 cm2, perlitli karışımda 24,26 cm2, çay atıklı karışımda 35,76 cm2, torflu karışımda 48,01 cm2 ve katkısız (kontrol) toprakta ise 83,92 cm2 olarak ölçülmüştür. Bu verilere bağlı olarak, kontrol toprağının diğer ortamlara göre tercih edilme oranın istatistiksel olarak önemli olduğu saptanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMEN, C., TEMEL, E., ÇATAL, G. (2022). Effect of Some Waste and Soil Regulators on Worm Behavior in Soil. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 79–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/484578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Allison, L.E., Moodie, C.D., 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 1379--1400. Am. Soc. of Agron., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Anonim, 2013a. http://www.bugday.org/portal/haber_detay.php?hid:150 (Erişim tarihi: 23.04.2013; Güncellenme tarihi: 27.04.2004). Anonim, 2013b. http://www.organikoop.com/toprak-solucanlari (Erişim tarihi: 27.04.2013).
  2. Baker, G.H., Amato, M., Ladd, J., 2003. Influences of Aporrectodea trapezoides and A. rosea (Lumbricidae) on the uptake of nitrogen and yield of oats (Avena fanta) and lupins (Lupinus angustifolius). Pedobiologia. 47: 857--862. Baker, G.H., 1994. Earthworm, new discoveries, Rural Research. CSIRO Quarterly. 163. 19--23. Blouin, M., Hodson, M.E., Delgado, E.A., Baker, G., Brussaard, L., Butt, K.R., Dai, J., Dendooven, L., Peres, G., Tondoh, J.E., Cluzeau, D., Brun, J.J., 2013. review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science. 64: 161--182. Bouyocuos, G.J., 1951. Recalibration of Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of Soils. Agronomy Journal. 43: 434--438. Coq, S., Barthes, B.G., Oliver, R., Rabary, B., Blanchart, E., 2007. Earthworm activity affects soil aggregation and organic matter dynamics according to the quality and localization of crop residues--an experimental study (Madagascar). Soil Biol. Biochem. 39: 2119--2128. Darwin, C.R., 1881. The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms, with Observations on their Habits. Murray, London. Dunger, W., 1983.
  3. Tiere im Boden. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt. Edwards, C.A., 2013.
  4. Soil Biology, Chapter 8: Earthworms, the living soil: Earthworms, Ohio State University. http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/concepts/soil_biology/earthworms.html
  5. Edwards, C.A., Bohlen, P.J., 1996. Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. 3ml Ed. Chapman Hall, London. Evans, A.C., 1947. Method for studying the burrowing activities of earthworms. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 11: 643--650. Ferriere, G., 1980. Fonctions des lombriciens: VII. Une methode d'analyse de la matiere organique vegetale ingeree. Pedobiologia. 20: 263--273. Fn'ind, H.C., Wallrabenstein H., Leibner S., Blohm R., 2008. Developing soil quality test with 2D terraria and Aporrectodea caliginosa--Berichte der DBG, http://www.dbges.de.
  6. Fuller, H., 1954. Die Regenwürmer. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei, Heft 140 (Nachdıuck). Wittenberg: A. Ziemsen Verlag. Graff, O., 1953. Die Regenwürmer Deutschlands. Han