Journals / ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Comparisons Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Chickpea under Different Tillage Systems and Soil Residual Nitrogen

Nohutta Farklı Toprak İşleme Sistemleri ve Bakiye Azota Bağlı Azot Kullanım Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
243–250
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Allof the traits except for seed yield were significantly affected by years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different tillage methods and soilresidual nitrogen on chickpea nitrogen use efficiency and yield.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research was conducted with two years(2012/2013-2014/2015) period at research field of Faculty of Agriculture, Eskisehir Osmangazi University,Eskisehir, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Allof the traits except for seed yield were significantly affected by years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different tillage methods and soilresidual nitrogen on chickpea nitrogen use efficiency and yield. This research was conducted with two years(2012/2013-2014/2015) period at research field of Faculty of Agriculture, Eskisehir Osmangazi University,Eskisehir, Turkey. The experiment was designed in randomized complete block design as split split plot withthree replicates. Main plots were composed to conventional (CT) and reduced tillage (RT). Wheat-wheat (WW);wheat-fallow (WF); wheat-chickpea (WC) crop rotations were placed in sub plots, and four nitrogen doses (0,50, 100, 150 kg ha-1) were evaluated as sub-sub plots. Plant protein ratio, plant N ratio and nitrogen utilizationefficiency (NUtE) were higher RT than CT, however nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen uptakeefficiency (NUpE) were higher CT than RT. Increasing nitrogen doses were not affected the plant protein ratioand plant N ratio as expected. NUE and NUpE decreased by increasing nitrogen doses but NUtE increased. Allof the traits except for seed yield were significantly affected by years.

Özet

Farklı toprak işleme yöntemleri ve bakiye azotun nohutun verim ve azot kullanım etkinliğine etkisini araştırmak bu çalışmanın temel amacıdır. Araştırma iki yıl süre ile (2012/2013-2014/2015) Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi deneme alanlarında yürütülmüştür. Denemeler bölünen bölünmüş deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Ana parsellerde geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme metodları bulunmaktadır. Buğday-buğday, buğday-nadas ve buğday-nohut ekim nöbeti sistemleri alt parsellere yerleştirilmiş ve dört azot dozu (0, 50, 100, 150 kg ha-1 ) alt-alt parseller olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bitkide protein oranı, bitkide azot oranı ve NUtE azaltılmış işlenen topraklarda daha yüksek iken, NUE ve NUpE geleneksel işlenen topraklarda daha yüksek olmuştur. Artan azot dozları bitkide protein oranı ve bitkide azot oranını beklendiği şekilde etkilememiştir. Artan azot dozları NUE ve NUpE azaltırken, NUtE artırmıştır. Tane verimi hariç incelenen tüm özelliklerde yıllar arasındaki farklılıklar önemli çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayan, N., Arpacioglu, N. G. A., Kutlu, İ., Adak, M. S. (2022). Comparisons Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Chickpea under Different Tillage Systems and Soil Residual Nitrogen. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 243–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/484432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abad, A., Lloveras, J., Michelena, A., Ferran, J., Royo, C., Nachit, M.M., Fonzo, N., Araus, J.L. 2000. Nitrogen fertilization effects on yield and quality of durum wheat in the Ebro Valley (Spain). Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region: new challenges, Proceedings of a seminar, 12-14
  2. April, Zaragoza, Spain. Aksakal, E.L., 2004. Soil compaction its importance in terms of agriculture. Journal of Ataturk University Agricultural Faculty. 35(3-4): 247-252. Anonymous, 2015. Soil and Leaf Analyses Lab of Eskisehir Agriculture Office. Baskan, O., Unver, I., 2000. Effect of soil profile depth on fallow activity in Ankara conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry, 24: 721-727.
  3. Brennan, J.R., Hackett, T., McCabe, J., Grant, R.A., Fortune, P.D., Forristal, B., 2014. The effect of tillage system and residue management on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat in a cool Atlantic climate. European Journal of Agronomy, 54: 61– 69. Bremner, J.M., Mulvaney, C.S., 1982. Nitrogen-total. (Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, (ed.) Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., 595–624.
  4. El Bassam, N., 1998. A concept of selection for 'low input' wheat varieties. Euphytica. 100: 95-100.
  5. Genctan, T., 2006. Field Farming. Publications of Namık Kemal University No: 21, Textbook No: 11, Tekirdag, 386 p. Gourley, C.J.P., Ailen, D.L., Russelle, M.P., 1993. Defining phosphorus efficiency in plants. Plant Soil. 155/156: 289-292.
  6. Gul, M.K., Cem, O.E., Kahrıman, F., Turhan, H., 2007. Changes in protein value in some chickpea lines in spring and winter periods under Canakkle conditions.7th Field Crops Congress, July 25-27,
  7. Erzurum. Kamara, A.Y., Menkir, A., Sanginga, N., 2003. Nitrogen use efficiency of maize genotypes improved for tolerance to low nitrogen and drought stress. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigaria. Kapluhan, E., 2013. Drought in Turkey and the effect of drought on agriculture. Marmara Geography Journal. 27: 487-510.
  8. Kara, B., 2006. Determination of the yield and yield component, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of corn on the different plant density and nitrogen doses in the Cukurova conditions. Çukurova University, Science Institute, Department of Field Crops, PhD Thesis, 162 p. Karasahin, M., 2014. Nitrogen use efficiency in crop production and negative effect of reactive nitrogen on environment. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science