Journals / Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Version of the Mental Health-promoting Knowledge Scale: Validity and Reliability Study Among Adolescents

Ruh Sağlığını Geliştirici Bilgiler Ölçeğinin Türkçe Versiyonu: Ergenlerde Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Pages
7–34
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the known groups were compared according to total average score of the scale, it was found that the difference between nursing students and adolescents included in the study was significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to test psychometric analysis of the Turkish version of “mental health-promoting knowledge scale (MHPK)” measuring adolescents’ knowledge on how they can obtain and maintain a good mental health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This study was conducted with 137 adolescents studying at a high school between November 1, 2020 and January 15, 2021.The data for the study were collected by using the socio-demographic characteristics and mental health information form and MHPK.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the known groups were compared according to total average score of the scale, it was found that the difference between nursing students and adolescents included in the study was significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to test psychometric analysis of the Turkish version of “mental health-promoting knowledge scale (MHPK)” measuring adolescents’ knowledge on how they can obtain and maintain a good mental health. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted with 137 adolescents studying at a high school between November 1, 2020 and January 15, 2021.The data for the study were collected by using the socio-demographic characteristics and mental health information form and MHPK. Validity of the scale was assessed by the analyses of language, surface, content and construct validity. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory confirmatory factor analysis and known-groups validity. Reliability was assessed by item analysis relying on item-total correlation parameter, internal consistency analysis and test-retest reliability. Results: It was ascertained that the factor loads ranged from 0.541 to 0.795 in exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale had a fine goodness of fit with a single-factor structure. When the known groups were compared according to total average score of the scale, it was found that the difference between nursing students and adolescents included in the study was significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ergenlerin iyi bir ruh sağlığının nasıl elde edilip korunacağına ilişkin bilgilerini ölçen ruh sağlığını geliştirici bilgiler ölçeğinin (RSGBÖ) Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerini test etmek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, 1 Kasım 2020-15 Ocak 2021 tarihleri arasında bir lisede öğretim gören 137 ergen ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri sosyo-demografik özellikler ve ruh sağlığı bilgi formu ve RSGBÖ kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerlik analizi için dil, yüzey, kapsam, yapı geçerliliği analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Yapı geçerliliği için açımlayıcı, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve bilinen grup geçerliliği yapılmıştır. Güvenirlik analizinde; madde-bütün korelasyon katsayısına dayalı madde analizi, iç tutarlılık analizi ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde faktör yüklerinin 0,54 ile 0,79 arasında değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ise ölçeğin tek boyutta iyi bir uyum iyiliğine sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçek toplam puan ortalamasına göre bilinen grup karşılaştırmasında hemşirelik öğrencileri ile çalışma kapsamına alınan ergenler arasındaki fark önemli bulunmuş (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Mercan, N., Coşkun, S. (2022). Turkish Version of the Mental Health-promoting Knowledge Scale: Validity and Reliability Study Among Adolescents. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 7–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/484372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Hurley D, Swann C, Allen MS, Ferguson HL, Vella SA. A Systematic Review of Parent and Caregiver Mental Health Literacy. Community Ment Health J. 2020;56:2-21
  2. Attygalle UR, Perera H, Jayamanne BDW. Mental health literacy in adolescents: ability to recognise problems, helpful interventions and outcomes. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017;11:38
  3. Seedaket S, Turnbull N, Phajan T, Wanchai A. Improving mental health literacy in adolescents: systematic review of supporting intervention studies. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25:1055-1064
  4. Coles ME, Ravid A, Gibb B, George-Denn D, Bronstein LR, McLeod S. Adolescent Mental Health Literacy: Young People’s Knowledge of Depression and Social Anxiety Disorder. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58:57-62
  5. Lubman DI, Cheetham A, Jorm AF, Berridge BJ, Wilson C, Blee F, Mckay-Brown L, Allen N, Proimos J. Australian adolescents’ beliefs and help-seeking intentions towards peers experiencing symptoms of depression and alcohol misuse. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:658
  6. Cotton SM, Wright A, Harris MG, Jorm AF, McGorry PD. Influence of gender on mental health literacy in young Australians. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40:790-796
  7. Bröder J, Okan O, Bauer U, Bruland D, Schlupp S, Bollweg TM, Saboga- Nunes L, Bond E, Sørensen K, Bitzer EM, Jordan S, Domanska O, Firnges C, Carvalho GS, Bittlingmayer UH, Levin-Zamir D, Pelikan J, Sahrai D, Lenz A, Wahl P, Thomas M, Kessl F, Pinheiro P. Health literacy in childhood and youth: a systematic review of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:361
  8. Liddle SK, Deane FP, Batterham M, Vella SA. A brief sports-based mental health literacy program for male adolescents: a cluster- randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2019;25:20-44
  9. Bjørnsen HN, Eilertsen MEB, Ringdal R, Espnes GA, Moksnes UK. Positive mental health literacy: development and validation of a measure among Norwegian adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:717 10. González-Cutre D, Romero-Elías M, Jiménez-Loaisa A, Beltrán- Carrillo VJ, Hagger M. Testing the need for novelty as a candidate need in basic psychological needs theory, Motivation and Emotion. 2020;44
  10. Erişen MA, Kesen NF, Daşbaş S. Psikoloji, PDR ve sosyal hizmet öğrencilerinin duygu stilleri, olumsuz değerlendirilme korkusu ve algılanan sosyal yetkinlik düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet. 2020;31:1599-1623
  11. Özdemir Y, Çok F. Ergenlikte özerklik gelişimi. Turkish Psych