Journals / İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 82 - Sayı: 4

COLPOSCOPIC EXAMINATION IN CYTOLOGY NEGATIVE WOMEN WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR NON-16/18 HPV TYPES

HPV TİP 16 VE 18 DIŞINDA POZİTİFLİĞİ OLUP SMEAR SONUCU NORMAL OLAN HASTALARIN KOLPOSKOPİK İNCELENMESİ

Pages
212–218
Publication Date
2019-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A co-test was scheduled one year later for 39 patients (13%) who had no lesions suspected of malignancy and a colposcopy-guided tissue sample was performed on 261 patients.Results: Histological examination results included inflammation (in 186 patients [62%]), CIN 1 (in 61 patients [20.33%]), CIN 2 (in 9 patients [3%], CIN 3 (in 3 patients [1%]) and cervical cancer (in 2 patients [%0.67]).Conclusion: One should keep in mind that a diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe lesions or even cervical cancer can be made using a colposcopy-guided biopsy in women who test positive for non 16/18 HPV types but have otherwise normal Pap smear test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To assess the colposcopic examination findings and biopsy results in women who tested positive for oncogenic Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) types other than HPV-16 and 18 while having otherwise normal Pap test results.Material and Method: This paper analyzes the results from a total of 300 women who tested positive for non-16/18 HPV types but had otherwise normal Pap test and underwent a colposcopic examination in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study subjects presented with postcoital bleeding, had a family history of cancer or exhibited macroscopic examination findings which were suspected to be malign.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A co-test was scheduled one year later for 39 patients (13%) who had no lesions suspected of malignancy and a colposcopy-guided tissue sample was performed on 261 patients.Results: Histological examination results included inflammation (in 186 patients [62%]), CIN 1 (in 61 patients [20.33%]), CIN 2 (in 9 patients [3%], CIN 3 (in 3 patients [1%]) and cervical cancer (in 2 patients [%0.67]).Conclusion: One should keep in mind that a diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe lesions or even cervical cancer can be made using a colposcopy-guided biopsy in women who test positive for non 16/18 HPV types but have otherwise normal Pap smear test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Human papilloma virus (HPV) · Smear tabakası · uterin servikal displazi

Abstract

Objective: To assess the colposcopic examination findings and biopsy results in women who tested positive for oncogenic Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) types other than HPV-16 and 18 while having otherwise normal Pap test results.Material and Method: This paper analyzes the results from a total of 300 women who tested positive for non-16/18 HPV types but had otherwise normal Pap test and underwent a colposcopic examination in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2017. The study subjects presented with postcoital bleeding, had a family history of cancer or exhibited macroscopic examination findings which were suspected to be malign. A co-test was scheduled one year later for 39 patients (13%) who had no lesions suspected of malignancy and a colposcopy-guided tissue sample was performed on 261 patients.Results: Histological examination results included inflammation (in 186 patients [62%]), CIN 1 (in 61 patients [20.33%]), CIN 2 (in 9 patients [3%], CIN 3 (in 3 patients [1%]) and cervical cancer (in 2 patients [%0.67]).Conclusion: One should keep in mind that a diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe lesions or even cervical cancer can be made using a colposcopy-guided biopsy in women who test positive for non 16/18 HPV types but have otherwise normal Pap smear test.

Özet

Amaç: Human Papilloma Virüs (HPV) tip 16 ve 18 dışında pozitifliği olup, smear sonucu normal olan hastaların kolposkopik muayene ve biyopsi sonuçlarını incelemek Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda smear sonucu normal, ancak HPV tip 16-18 dışında pozitifliği olan ve Ocak 2017- Aralık 2017 tarihleri arasında hastanemizde kolposkopi yapılan 300 hasta incelendi. Hastalarımızın genel olarak kolposkopi endikasyonu postkoital kanama, ailede jinekolojik malignite öyküsü ve makroskopik şüpheli lezyon bulunması idi. Kolposkopi sırasında şüpheli lezyonu olmayan 39 hastaya (% 13) bir yıl sonra ko-test için kontrole çağrılırken, 261 hastaya kolposkopi kılavuzlu doku örneklemesi yapıldı.Bulgular: Histolojik inceleme sonuçları 186 hastada (%62) inflamasyon, 61 hastada (%20,33) CIN 1, 9 hastada (%3) CIN 2, 3 hastada (%1) CIN 3 ve 2 hastada (%0,67) servikal kanser olarak rapor edilmiştir. Sonuç: HPV tip 16-18 dışında pozitifliği olup smear sonucu normal olan hastalarda CIN 2 ve üstü lezyon, hatta kanser teşhisi konulabileceği unutulmamalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZLİ, R., SAKİN, Ö., ANGIN, A. D., ÇIKMAN, M. S., PİRİMOĞLU, Z. M. (2019). COLPOSCOPIC EXAMINATION IN CYTOLOGY NEGATIVE WOMEN WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR NON-16/18 HPV TYPES. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 82 - Sayı: 4, 212–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/48408

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Basu P, Meheus F, Chami Y, Hariprasad R, Zhao F, Sankaranarayanan R. Management algorithms for cervical cancer screening and precancer treatment for resourcelimited settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;138(Suppl 1): 26-32.
  2. Tracht J, Wrenn A, Eltoum IE. Primary HPV testing verification: A retrospective ad-hoc analysis of screeningalgorithms on women doubly tested for cytology and HPV. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45(7):580-6.
  3. MarianiL, Igidbashian S, Sandri MT, Vici P, Landoni F. The clinical implementation of primary HPV screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(3):266-71.
  4. Tshomo U, Franceschi S, Tshokey T, Tobgay T, Baussano I, Tenet V, et al. Evaluation of cytology versus human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening algorithms in Bhutan. Oncotarget 2017;8(42):72438-46.
  5. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, et al. International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomized controlled trials. Lancet 2014;383(9916):524-32.
  6. Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357(16):1589-97.
  7. Horn J, Denecke A, Luyten A, Rothe B, Reinecke-Lüthge A, Mikolajczyk R, et al. Reduction of cervical cancer incidence within a primary HPV screening pilot Project (WOLPHSCREEN) in Wolfsburg, Germany. Br J Cancer. 2019 Apr 16. Rijkaart DC, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, Bulkmans NW, Heideman DA, et al. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):78-88.
  8. Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2006;119(5):1095-101.
  9. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, Meijer CJ, Poljak M, Ogilvie G, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F88-99. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, et al. New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papilloma virus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst 200