Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algısının iş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi

The impact of corporate Social responsibility perception on the job satisfaction and organizational commitment

Pages
185–202
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From the findings obtainedthrough chi square, t-test and ANOVA, one can observe an insignificant relation betweenorganizational commitment and job satisfaction, and perceptions of corporate socialresponsibilities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Corporate social responsibility activities influence the stakeholders in the first place, hence theemployees, one of the vital stakeholders of the organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thispaper investigates the employees perception on corporate social responsibility, and examines theeffect of this perception on organizational commitment and job satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From the findings obtainedthrough chi square, t-test and ANOVA, one can observe an insignificant relation betweenorganizational commitment and job satisfaction, and perceptions of corporate socialresponsibilities.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility activities influence the stakeholders in the first place, hence theemployees, one of the vital stakeholders of the organizations. Social responsibility activities canhave a direct effect on the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of employees. Thispaper investigates the employees perception on corporate social responsibility, and examines theeffect of this perception on organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Hence, the individualfactors that have an impact on this perception, namely gender, age, education level, thehierarchical position in the organization, the working time and the participation to the company ssocial responsibility projects, are considered. The data collection is through a survey conductedamong the employees of Turkish Petroleum Refineries Corporation (TUPRAS), the third mostprofitable and the largest private firm quoted to the Borsa Istanbul. From the findings obtainedthrough chi square, t-test and ANOVA, one can observe an insignificant relation betweenorganizational commitment and job satisfaction, and perceptions of corporate socialresponsibilities.

Özet

Günümüzde şirketlerin sorumlulukları ekonomik ve yasal oldu ğu kadar ahlaki ve kamusaltemellere de dayanmaktad ı r. Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamaları örgütlerin en önemlipaydaş ları ndan biri olan çal ı ş anları da etkilemektedir. Bu uygulamalar çal ı şanları n örgütselbağl ı l ı k ve i ş tatminlerini etkileyebilmektedir. Bu çal ı ş ma çal ı ş anları n kurumsal sosyal sorumlulukalg ı sı n ı ve bu algı nı n çal ı ş anları n i ş tatmini ve örgütsel bağl ı l ı k etkilerini araş tı rmaktadı r. Buamaçla çal ı şanları n cinsiyeti, yaşı , e ğ itim düzeyi, kurum içi pozisyonu, i şletmede çal ı ş ma süresi vesosyal sorumluluk projelerine katı l ı mı olmak üzere toplam altı bireysel faktörün etkisiincelenmektedir. Bu çal ı ş ma TÜPRA Ş çal ı şanları ile yap ı lan anketlere dayanmaktadı r. Elde edilenveriler ki-kare, t-test ve anova testlerine tabi tutulmuş tur. Bulgulara göre çal ı şanları n kurumsalsosyal sorumluluk algı lamaları ile onları n örgütsel bağl ı l ı kları ve i ş tatminleri arası nda anlaml ı birili ş ki bulunamamı ş tı r.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUZCU, A. (2022). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algısının iş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 185–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/483152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adams, J.S. (1963).
  2. Toward an Understanding of Inequity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 422-436.
  3. Bronn, P.S., Vrioni, A.B. & Belliu, A. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview, International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222.
  4. Caldwell, D.F., Chatman, J.A. & O’Reilly, C.A. (1990). Building Organizational Commitment: A Multiform Study, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 245-261.
  5. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward The Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  6. Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business Society, 38(3), 268-295. Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Communication from the Commission Concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development 347 final. Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
  7. Davis, K. (1998).
  8. İşletmelerde İnsan Davran ı şı, İ stanbul: İ stanbul Üniver sitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yay ın ı. Drummond, H. (2000). Introduction to Organizational Behavior, New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Dutton, J., Dukerich, J.M. & Harquail, C. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
  10. Ekin, M. G. & Tezölmez, H. (1999). Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender, Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 17-34.
  11. Erdheim, J., Wang, M. & Zickar, M. (2006). Linking the Big Five Personality Constructs to Organizational Commitment, Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 959-970.
  12. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, University of Minnesota, London: Pitman Publishing. Gilder, D., Schuyt, T. & Breedijk, M. (2005). Effects of Employee Volunteering Program on The Work Force: The ABN-AMRO Case, Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 143-153.
  13. Griffin, J. & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate, Business and Society, 36(1), 5-31.
  14. Herndon, N.C., John, P.F. & Quey-Jen, Y. (2001). An Investigation of Moral Values and the Ethical Content of the Corporate Culture: Taiwanese Versus U.S Sales People, Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 73-85.
  15. Ibrahim, N.A. & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). Effect of Board Members Gender on Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientati