Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Gelişmekte Olan Bir Piyasada Sermaye Yapısı: Türkiye Örneği

Capital Structure in an Emerging Stock Market: The Case of Turkey*

Pages
639–660
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that, established theories such as trade-off, pecking order, and market timing fail to explain the observed leverages adequately, largely made up of short time debts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Capital structure is an important factor in planning and realising operations of a company.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The paper applies panel data analysis for manufacturing firms listed on the Borsa Istanbul (BIST) over the period of 2003-2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that, established theories such as trade-off, pecking order, and market timing fail to explain the observed leverages adequately, largely made up of short time debts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Capital structure is an important factor in planning and realising operations of a company. Operations and decisions of a company shape the capital structure. The aim of this paper is to investigate the firm-specific determinants of capital structure under changing economic conditions in Turkey. The paper applies panel data analysis for manufacturing firms listed on the Borsa Istanbul (BIST) over the period of 2003-2011. Results show that, established theories such as trade-off, pecking order, and market timing fail to explain the observed leverages adequately, largely made up of short time debts. This outcome is not surprising as most of the assumptions of these theories are effective for the developed markets, which are not in force in the developing countries.

Özet

Sermaye yapısı bir işletmenin faaliyetlerinin planlanmasında ve gerçekleştirilmesinde önemli olan ve aynı zamanda bu faaliyetlerin sonucu olarak şekillenen bir faktördür. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiyedeki işletmelerin sermaye yapısına etki eden firmaya özgü belirleyicileri değişen ekonomik koşullar altında incelemektir. Bu çalışmada 2003-2011 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbulda işlem gören üretim işletmelerinden elde edilen verilere panel veri analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, dengeleme, finansman hiyerarşisi ve piyasa zamanlaması gibi geleneksel sermaye yapısı teorileri, gelişmekte olan bir ülkenin işletmelerinden oluşan örneklemin sermaya yapılarını açıklamakta yetersiz kalmıştır. Bunun ana nedeni, bu teorilerin gelişmiş ülkeler için geçerli olan varsayımlara dayandırılmış olmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKMAN, E., GOKBULUT, R. I., GOKBULUT, E., TEMEL, H. N. (2022). Gelişmekte Olan Bir Piyasada Sermaye Yapısı: Türkiye Örneği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 639–660. https://ajindex.com/articles/483146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Agunbiade, D.A. & Adeboye, N.O. (2012). Estimation of Heteroscedasticity Effects in a Classical Linear Regression Model of a Cross-Sectional Data. Progress in Applied Mathematics 4(2), 18-28.
  2. Akman, E. (2012). Firm Specific Determinants of Capital Structure: A Panel Data Analysis on the Manufacturing Companies Listed on the ISE. PhD Thesis. Zonguldak: Bulent Ecevit University Institute of Social Sciences. Albayrak, A.S. & Akbulut, R. (2008). Factors That Affect Profitability: The Analysis on The Firms Registered in Industrial and Service Sector of ISE, International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 4(7), 55-82.
  3. Almazan, A. & Molina, C. (2005). Intra-industry Capital Structure Dispersion. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14(2), 263-297.
  4. Alves, P.F.P. & Ferreira, M.A. (2011). Capital Structure and Law Around the World, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 21(3), 119-150.
  5. Association of Factoring. (2011).
  6. Annual Report. Faktoring Dernegi, Istanbul. Baker, M. & Wurgler, J. (2002).
  7. Market Timing and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance. 57, 1–32. Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. The Atrium Southern Gate Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Baltagi, B., Bressonb, J. & Pirottec, A. (2003).
  8. Fixed Effects, Random Effects or Hausman-Taylor? A Pretest Estimator, Economics Letters, 79, 361–369. BRSA (Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency). (2010). From Crisis to Financial Stability: Turkey Experience, Working Paper, 3. Edition,
  9. Strategy Development Department, Ankara. BRSA (Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency). (2011).
  10. Financial Markets Report, December, Vol. 24, Strategy Development Department, Ankara.
  11. Bhaduri, S.N. (2002). Determinants of Capital Structure Choice: A Study of the Indian Corporate Sector, Applied Financial Economics, 12, 655-665.
  12. Booth, L., Varouj, A., Demirguc-Kunt, A. & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital Structures in Developing Countries, Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87-130.
  13. Bowman, J. (1980). The Importance of a Market Value Measurement of Debt in Assessing Leverage, Journal of Accounting Research, (18), 242-254.
  14. Burca, N. (2008). Review of Relationship Between Capital Structure and Stock Values in Different Stock Exchange Markets. PhD Thesis. Ankara:
  15. Gazi University. Buyuktortop, M. (2007). Capital Structures of Multinational Corporations: A Study on the ISE. PhD thesis. Ankara:
  16. Gazi University. Chakraborty, I. (2010). Capital Structure in an Emerging Stock Market: The Case of India,