Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Self- Awareness of Falls in Elderly Scale Among Elderly Inpatients

Pages
69–78
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because of factor analysis, it was found that the scale obtained in the Turkish adaptation consisted of 21 items and 4 sub-dimensions, the items formed in the sub- dimensions of the scale showed a different structure from the original scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS: This research was conducted methodologically to assess the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Self- Awareness of Falls in Elderly (SAFE) Scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: This methodological study was conducted with 346 elderly individuals who received inpatient treatment in the hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because of factor analysis, it was found that the scale obtained in the Turkish adaptation consisted of 21 items and 4 sub-dimensions, the items formed in the sub- dimensions of the scale showed a different structure from the original scale.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This research was conducted methodologically to assess the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Self- Awareness of Falls in Elderly (SAFE) Scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This methodological study was conducted with 346 elderly individuals who received inpatient treatment in the hospital. Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire and the Awareness of Falls in Elderly Scale were used as data collection tools. RESULTS: The average age of elderly individuals is 71.20±5.8, they have at least one chronic disease, 19.2% of them have dropped at least once in the past year, and 36.7% are afraid of falling. Language adaptation of the scale was provided using the translation and back translation method. Ten experts’ opinions were taken for content validity and Content Validity Index was found to be 0.942. Because of factor analysis, it was found that the scale obtained in the Turkish adaptation consisted of 21 items and 4 sub-dimensions, the items formed in the sub- dimensions of the scale showed a different structure from the original scale. The reliability of the scale was examined by internal consistency and stability (test-retest). The internal consistency Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.811. CONCLUSION: As a result, the scale obtained because of the Turkish adaptation study of the SAFE scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

🔖

Cite This Article

Birgili, F., Kılınç, S., Uğurlu, N. B. (2022). Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Self- Awareness of Falls in Elderly Scale Among Elderly Inpatients. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 69–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/482163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. World Health Organization, World Health Organization. Ageing, and Life Course Unit. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. World Health Organization, 2008
  2. Alvarez NM. Patients with cognitive impairment and falls: characteristics of a group of elderly patients. J Aging Geriatr Med. 2018;2:1-2
  3. Khow KSF, Dollard J, Bray K, et al. A randomized controlled feasibility study to evaluate the effects of a goal-setting coaching intervention using feedback from an accelerometer on sedentary time in older people at risk of falls (SMART-MOVE): a study protocol. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2018;4:1-14
  4. Gale CR, Westbury LD, Cooper C, Dennison EM. Risk factors for incident falls in older men and women: the English longitudinal study of ageing. BMC Geriatrics. 2018;18:1-9
  5. Yoo JS, Kim CG, Yim JE, Jeon MY. Risk factors of repeated falls in the community dwelling old people. J Exerc Rehabil. 2019;15:275-281
  6. Perracini MR, Teixeira LF, Ramos JL, Pires RS, Najas MS. Fall-related factors among less and more active older outpatients. Braz J Phys Ther. 2012;16:166- 172
  7. Stevens JA, Rudd RA. Circumstances and contributing causes of fall deaths among persons aged 65 and older: United States, 2010. Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:470-475
  8. Yaşar G, Gülengün T. Determination of risk factors in patient falls. J Nurs Sci. 2018;1:15-20
  9. Alamgir H, Wong NJ, Hu Y, Yu M, Marshall A, Yu S. Epidemiology of falls in older adults in Texas. Southern Med J. 2015;108:119-124
  10. Sherrington C, Michaleff ZA, Fairhall N, et al. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:1750-1758
  11. Terroso M, Rosa N, Marques AT, Simoes R. Physical Consequences of Falls in The Elderly: A Literature Review From 1995 to 2010. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2014;11:51-59
  12. Fernández M, Valbuena C, Natal C. Risk of falls and consumption of medicines in an elderly population. J Healthc Qual Res. 2018;33:105-108
  13. Hignett S, Sands G, Griffiths P. In-patient falls: what can we learn from incident reports? Age Ageing. 2013;42:527-531
  14. Li IF, Hsiung Y, Hsing HF, Lee MY, Chang TH, Huang, MY. Elderly Taiwanese’s intrinsic risk factors for fall-related injuries. Int J Gerontol. 2016;10:137-141
  15. Heinimann NB, Kressig RW. Accidental falls in the elderly. Praxis. 2014 103:767-773
  16. Shyu ML, Huang HC, Wu MJ, Chang HJ. Development and validation of the Self-Awareness of Falls in Elderly Scale among elderly inp