Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Therapeutic Interventions Implemented During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Evidence

Pages
287–302
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed evidence for the efficacy of remdesivir and corticosteroids in critically ill patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to review the knowledge and evidence on the therapeutic effectiveness of some agents currently utilized for treating coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).
📊
Key Findings & Data:These 25 studies covered treatments with antimalarials, anticoagulation, antivirals, corticosteroids, interferons, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed evidence for the efficacy of remdesivir and corticosteroids in critically ill patients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the knowledge and evidence on the therapeutic effectiveness of some agents currently utilized for treating coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. The publications identified were screened to select cohort studies, randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses, narrative and systematic reviews. End points displaying the results of epidemiological and statistical methods were evaluated to specify the strength of evidence. Eleven randomised controlled trials, a controlled trial, five cohort studies, four reviews, two systematic reviews, a systematic review-meta- analysis, and a meta-analysis were included. These 25 studies covered treatments with antimalarials, anticoagulation, antivirals, corticosteroids, interferons, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma. The outcomes assessed included all-cause and in-hospital mortality, death or mechanical ventilation within 28 days, mean or median day to viral clearance, median and day-28 recovery time, and improvement in oxygen support class. The results showed evidence for the efficacy of remdesivir and corticosteroids in critically ill patients. Only corticosteroids showed efficacy regarding reduced mortality. Favipiravir, anticoagulation, interferons and monoclonal antibodies were agents with weaker evidence of therapeutic efficacy. The key findings of this review highlight evidence regarding the efficacy of remdesivir and corticosteroids for hospitalised patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

AŞUT, Ö., ÇALI, Ş. (2022). Therapeutic Interventions Implemented During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Evidence. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 287–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/482162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. World Health Organisation. Emergencies preparedness, response. Pneumonia of unknown cause – China. Available from: https://www. who.int/csr/don/05-january-2020-pneumonia-of-unkown-cause-china/en/ (Accessed on May, 5 2020)
  2. Tobaiqy M, Qashqary M, Al-Dahery S, Mujallad A, Hershan AA, Kamal MA, et al. Therapeutic management of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. Infect Prev Pract. 2020; 2(3): 100061
  3. World Health Organisation. Available from: www.who.int
  4. CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Characteristics of Health Care Personnel with COVID-19 - United States, February 12-April 9, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(15): 477-81
  5. Harapan H, Itoh N, Yufika A, Winardi W, Keam S, Te H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review. J Infect Public Health. 2020; 13(5): 667-73
  6. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel Coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan,China. JAMA. 2020; 323(11): 1061-9. Erratum in: JAMA. 2021; 325(11): 1113
  7. Suleyman G, Fadel RA, Malette KM, Hammond C, Abdulla H, Entz A, et al. Clinical characteristics and morbidity associated with coronavirus disease 2019 in a series of patients in metropolitan Detroit. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(6): e2012270
  8. Kim PS, Read SW, Fauci AS. Therapy for early COVID-19: A critical need. JAMA. 2020; 324(21): 2149-50
  9. Tahiri Joutei Hassani R, Bennis A. Hdroxychloroquine as antiviral prophylaxis for exposed caregivers to COVID-19: An urgent appraisal is needed. J Infect Public Health. 2020; 13(6): 865-7
  10. Chatterjee P, Anand T, Singh KJ, Rasaily R, Singh R, Das S, et al. Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: A case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19. Indian J Med Res. 2020; 151(5): 459-67
  11. Gupta N, Agrawal S, Ish P. Chloroquine in COVID-19: the evidence. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020; 90(1)
  12. Ferner RE, Aronson JK. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19. BMJ. 2020; 369: m1432
  13. McEniery CM, Fisk M, Miles K, Kaloyirou F, Hubsch A, Smith J, et al. ChemoPROphyLaxIs with hydroxychloroquine For covId-19 infeCtious disease (PROLIFIC) to prevent COVID-19 infection in frontline healthcare workers: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020; 21(1):604. Erratum in: Trials. 2020; 21(1): 641
  14. World Health Organisation. WHO discontinues hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir treatment arms for COVID-19. (