SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Aquatic Sciences and Engineering / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

A SURVEY ON SCALE OF Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) BY GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC METHODS DEPEND ON GENDER, AGE AND SEASON VARIATIONS

Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843)’NIN PULLARINDA CİNSİYET, YAŞ VE MEVSİME BAĞLI VARYASYONLARIN GEOMETRİK MORFOMETRİK YÖNTEMLERLE İNCELENMESİ

Tarık ÇİÇEK
Alaettin KAYA
Serbest BİLİCİ
Pages
96–104
Publication Date
2016-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the analyses, there was a significant difference between gender and age groups in terms of gender and size (CS: Centroid Size) ANOVA, however, no difference was found in terms of the shape ANOVA of the samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a total of 82 (67♀♀, 15♂♂) Capoeta umbla samples from the same location in the River of Tigris and ages of scales taken from area between lateral line and dorsal fins of fishes were determined and just one scale from each fish sample photographed by an Olympus digital camera with Canon SX7 model binocular under the same conditions with 40Xmagnification and then six landmarks were taken by using tpsDig ver. 2.26 software.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), PCA (Principal Component Analysis), CVA (Canonical Variance Anlysis) and DFA (Discriminant Function Analysis) analysis were conducted by MorphoJ ver. 1.06d and PAST 3.11,.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the analyses, there was a significant difference between gender and age groups in terms of gender and size (CS: Centroid Size) ANOVA, however, no difference was found in terms of the shape ANOVA of the samples.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cyprinidae · Capoeta umbla · Pul

Abstract

In this study, a total of 82 (67♀♀, 15♂♂) Capoeta umbla samples from the same location in the River of Tigris and ages of scales taken from area between lateral line and dorsal fins of fishes were determined and just one scale from each fish sample photographed by an Olympus digital camera with Canon SX7 model binocular under the same conditions with 40Xmagnification and then six landmarks were taken by using tpsDig ver. 2.26 software. Then, ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), PCA (Principal Component Analysis), CVA (Canonical Variance Anlysis) and DFA (Discriminant Function Analysis) analysis were conducted by MorphoJ ver. 1.06d and PAST 3.11,. According to the results of the analyses, there was a significant difference between gender and age groups in terms of gender and size (CS: Centroid Size) ANOVA, however, no difference was found in terms of the shape ANOVA of the samples. Also, there was a significant difference between Mahalanobis distance of II-IV, II-V age groups and Autumn-Winter, Autumn-Spring of season groups.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Dicle Nehri’nden toplam 82 (67♀♀, 15♂♂) Capoeta umbla türüne ait balıklardan yanal çizginin ve dorsal yüzgecin arasındaki alandan alınan ve yaş tespiti yapılan pullardan bir tanesi Canon SX7 model binokülerde 40X büyütmede binokülere takılı Olympus dijital kamera ile fotoğrafları çekilmiş ve tpsDig ver. 2.26 programı kullanılarak 6 landmark alınmıştır. MorphoJ ver. 1.06d ve PAST 3.11 programları kullanılarak ANOVA (Varyans Analizi), PCA (Temel Öğeler Analizi), CVA (Kanonik Varyans Analizi) ve DFA (Ayrışım Fnonksiyonu ) analizleri yapılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda boyut (CS: Centroid Size) ANOVA bakımından cinsiyet ve yaş grupları arasında fark yeterli (p<0.05) bulunmuş ancak şekil ANOVA bakımından gruplar arasında fark (p>0.05) bulunmamıştır. CVA ve DFA sonucu II-IV, II-V yaş grupları ve sonbahar-kış ve sonbahar-ilkbahar grupları arasında Mahalanobis mesafesi yeterli düzeyde (p<0.05) farklı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, T., KAYA, A., BİLİCİ, S. (2016). A SURVEY ON SCALE OF Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) BY GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC METHODS DEPEND ON GENDER, AGE AND SEASON VARIATIONS. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 96–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/48136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aydın, R., Çalta, M., & Şen, D. (2003): Age and Growth of Capoeta trutta (Pisces:Cyprinidae) from Keban Dam Lake, Turkey. Archıwum Rybactwa Polsekıego, 11(2), 237-244.
  2. Banarescu, P. (1991): Zoogeography of freshwaters. Distribution and Dispersal of freshwater Animals in North America and Eurasia. Aula-Verlag Wiesbaden, Vol. 2, 1091 pp. Bilici, S., Kaya, A., Çiçek T., & Dörtbudak M.Y. (2016) Investigation of size and shape differences depend to sex, age and season on scales of smallmouth lotak (Cyprinion kais). Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 3(1) 37-45.
  3. Çoban, M. Z., Gündüz, F., Türkgülü, İ., Örnekçi, N.G., Yüce, S., Demirol, F., & Alp, A. (2013): Reproductive Properties of Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) Living in Lake Hazar (Elaziğ, Turkey). International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research (IJAFR), 2(2) 38-47.
  4. Danabaş, D., Yildirim, N.C., Yildirim, N., Onal, A.O., Uslu, G., Unlu, E., Danabaş, S., Ergin, C., & Tayhan, N. (2015). Changes in antioxidant defense system in gills of Capoeta umbla caught from Uzuncayir Dam Lake, Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 63, 72-79.
  5. Dörtbudak, M.Y., & Özcan, G. (2015). İkizce Çayı’ndaki (Şırnak) Siraz Balığının [Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843)] Otolit Biyometrisi-Balık Boyu Arasındaki İlişki. Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, 15(1), 67-72.
  6. Geldiay, R., & Balık, S. (1999).
  7. Türkiye Tatlı Su Balıkları, Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi Kitaplar Serisi No: 97. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, İzmir, 519 s. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., & Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1), 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
  8. Ibanez, A.L., Cowx, I.G. & O’higgins, P. (2007): Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Mugilidae. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 64, 1091-1100.
  9. Ibanez, A.L., Cowx, I.G., & O’Higgins, P. (2009). Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 155, 834-844.
  10. Ibanez, A.L., Cowx, I.G., & O’Higgins, P. (2009). Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 155, 834-844.
  11. Ibanez, A.L., Pacheco-Almanzar, E., & Cowx, I. G. (2012a). Does compensatory growth modify fish scale shape? Environmental Biology of Fishes, 94, 477-482. Ibanez,