Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

A Study of Analyzing the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Conflict Management Styles of Managers

Yöneticilerin Çatışma Yönetim Tarzları ve Kişilik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizine Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Pages
23–42
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that managers with high openness and agreeableness scores don’t prefer dominating style.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study was to analyze the relationship between personality and conflict management styles of managers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total of 315 government and private sector managers completed questionnaires.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that managers with high openness and agreeableness scores don’t prefer dominating style.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the relationship between personality and conflict management styles of managers. Total of 315 government and private sector managers completed questionnaires. One of the results of this study is that there is a relationship between personality and conflict management styles. Extraversion, openness and conscientiousness have a positive relationship with integrating style. The results indicate that managers with high openness and agreeableness scores don’t prefer dominating style. While neuroticism and agreeableness have a positive relationship with avoiding style, openness has a negative relationship. The results of this study can lead the way for the future researches on personality and conflict management styles.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı yöneticilerin kişilik özellikleri ve çatışma yönetim tarzları arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmektir. Toplam 315 kamu ve özel sektör yöneticisine anket uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgulardan ilki, yöneticilerin kişilik özellikleri ile tercih ettikleri çatışma yönetim tarzları arasında ilişki olduğudur. Dışa dönüklük, açıklık ve sorumluluk özellikleri ile tümleştirme tarzı arasında pozitif bir ilişki vardır. Sonuçlara göre açıklık ve geçimlilik özelliklerine sahip yöneticiler hükmetme tarzını tercih etmemektedirler. Duygusal dengesizlik ve geçimlilik ile kaçınma tarzı arasında pozitif bir ilişki varken, açıklık ile negatif ilişki vardır. Elde edilen bulgular, kişilik ile çatışma yönetim tarzı arasındaki ilişkileri analiz edecek gelecekteki araştırmalara yön verebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜRÜR, S. (2022). A Study of Analyzing the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Conflict Management Styles of Managers. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 23–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/480913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ANTONIONI, David (1998), “Relationship Between The Big Five Personality Factors And Conflict Management Styles”, International Journal Of Conflict Management, 9 (4), 336-355.
  2. BARRICK, Murray R. ve Michael K. MOUNT (1991), “The Big Five Personality Dimensions And Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 44 (1), 1-26.
  3. BONO, Joyce E., Terry L. BOLES,, Timothy JUDGE ve Kristy J. LAUVER (2002), “The Role Of Personality In Task And Relationship Conflict”, Journal Of Personality, 70 (3), 311-344.
  4. BOWDITCH, James L. ve Anthony F. BUONO (2005),
  5. Organizational Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA. BUCHANAN, David, ve Andrzej HUCZYNSKI (1997),
  6. Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall, UK. COSTA, Paul T. ve Robert R. McCRAE (1987), “Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, And Disease: Is The Bark Worse Than The Bite?”, Journal Of Personality, 55 (2), 299-316.
  7. COSTA, Paul T., Catherine M. BUSCH,, Alan B. ZONDERMAN ve Robert R. McCRAE (1986), “Correlations Of Mmpi Factor Scales With Measures Of The Five Factor Model Of Personality”, Journal Of Personality Assessment, 50 (4), 640-650.
  8. DIJKSTRA, Maria T. M., Dirk Van DIERENDONCK, Arne EVERS ve Carsten K. W. DE DREU (2005), “Conflict And Well-Being At Work: The Moderating Role Of Personality”, Journal Of Managerial Psychology, 20 (½), 87-104.
  9. EREN, Erol (2001), Örgütsel Davranış Ve Yönetim Psikolojisi, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A. Ş., İstanbul.
  10. EUWEMA, Martin C., Evert Van De VLIERT ve Arnold B. BAKKER (2003), “Substantive And Relational Effectiveness Of Organizational Conflict Behavior”, The International Journal Of Conflict Management, 14 (2), 119,139. GREENBERG, Jerald ve Robert A. BARON (2003),
  11. Behavior In Organizations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. GROSS, Michael A. ve Laura K. GUERRO (2000), “Managing Conflict Appropriately And Effectively: An Application Of The Competence Model To Rahim’s Organizational Conflict Styles”, The International Journal Of Conflict Management, 11 (3), 200-226.
  12. HARRISON, Frank (1980), “A Conceptual Model Of Organizational Conflict”, Business And Society, 19, 20, 2, 1, 30-40.
  13. IVANCEVICH, Gibson ve Donnelly KONOPASKE (2003),
  14. Organizations Behavior, Structure, Processes, Mcgraw-Hill Comp., United States. JONES, Robert E. ve Charles S. WHITE (1985), “Relationships Among Personality, Conflict Resolution Styles, And Task Effectiveness”, Group & Organization Studies, 10 (2), 152-167.
  15. KATZ, Daniel (1959), “Consistent Reactive Participation Of Group Members And Reduction Of Intergroup Confli