Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Comparative Performance Analysis of Conventional and Participation Banks

MEVDUAT VE KATILIM BANKALARININ KARŞILAŞTIRMALI PERFORMANS ANALİZİ

Pages
301–310
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis has shown that bank profitability has a positive relationship with capital adequacy and operational efficiency whereas it has a negative relationship with the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans as an indicator of credit quality

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Participation banks operating in the Turkish banking system have not yet demonstrated sufficient progress even though it has raised its share in the banking sector over time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, the performances of the participation banks have been analyzed in a comparative way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis has shown that bank profitability has a positive relationship with capital adequacy and operational efficiency whereas it has a negative relationship with the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans as an indicator of credit quality
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Participation banks operating in the Turkish banking system have not yet demonstrated sufficient progress even though it has raised its share in the banking sector over time. Increasing the efficiency of participation banks providing alternative investment and financing opportunities is crucial in terms of providing resources for the economy and development of the financial system. For this reason, the performances of the participation banks have been analyzed in a comparative way. In this study, the data has comprised financial ratios obtained from financial statement of participation banks in Turkey for the 2006-2014 periods. Independent samples t- test results revealed that the magnitude of liquid assets and total assets of deposit banks have been considerably higher than participation banks. Furthermore, in terms of capital adequacy, deposit banks have had a stronger structure than participation banks. In addition, the factors affecting the profitability of banks have been estimated by a two-stage generalized method of moments (GMM). The analysis has shown that bank profitability has a positive relationship with capital adequacy and operational efficiency whereas it has a negative relationship with the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans as an indicator of credit quality

Özet

Türk bankacılık sistemi içerisinde faaliyet gösteren katılım bankaları, her geçen gün aktif büyüklüğünü ve sektör içerisindeki payını artırmış olmasına rağmen yeterli bir gelişme gösterememiştir. Alternatif yatırım ve finansman imkânları sunan katılım bankalarının sektördeki etkinliğinin artması, finansal sistemin gelişimi ve ekonomiye kaynak sağlanması açısından önemli olmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmada, katılım bankalarının performansları karşılaştırmalı bir şekilde analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında, Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren mevduat ve katılım bankalarının 2006-2014 dönemi için mali tablo bilgilerinden elde edilen finansal oranlardan yararlanılmıştır. Bağımsız örneklemler t-Testi sonucunda, mevduat bankalarının toplam aktif ve likit aktif büyüklüklerinin katılım bankalarından daha yüksek olduğu ve sermaye yeterliliği anlamında mevduat bankalarının katılım bankalarına nazaran daha güçlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Ayrıca banka karlılığına etki eden faktörler, iki aşamalı genelleştirilmiş momentler metodu (generalized method of moment-GMM) ile tahmin edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda banka karlılığının operasyonel etkinlik ve sermaye yeterliliği ile pozitif yönlü, kredi kalitesinin göstergesi olan takipteki kredilerin toplam kredilere oranı ile negatif yönlü bir ilişkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

TORAMAN, C., ATA, H. A., BUĞAN, M. F. (2022). Comparative Performance Analysis of Conventional and Participation Banks. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 301–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/480705

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ALBERTAZZI, Ugo ve GAMBACORTA, Leonardo (2009), "Bank Profitability and the Business Cycle", Journal of Financial Stability, Vol 5(4), 393-409. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2008.10.002 ALKASSIM, Faisal (2005), "The Profitability of Islamic and Conventional Banking in the GCC Countries: A Comparative Study", Journal of Review of Islamic Economics, Vol 13(1), 5-30.
  2. AMBA, Muni Sekhar ve ALMUKHARREQ, Fayza (2013), "Impact of the Financial Crisis on Profitability of the Islamic Banks vs Conventional Banks - Evidence from GCC", International Journal of Financial Research, Vol 4(3), 83-93
  3. ANBAR, Adem ve ALPER, Deger (2011), "Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey", Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt 2(2), 139-152.
  4. ARELLANO, Manuel ve BOND, Stephen (1991), "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", The Review of Economic Studies, Vol 58(2), 277-297.
  5. ATHANASOGLOU, Panayiotis; DELIS, Manthos ve STAIKOURAS, Christos (2006), "Determinants of Bank Profitability in the South Eastern European Region", İnternet Adresi: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10274, Erişim Tarihi: 13.06.2015
  6. ATHANASOGLOU, Panayiotis; BRISSIMIS, Sophocles N. ve DELIS, Matthaios D. (2008), "Bank-Specific, Industry-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability", Journal of International Financial Markets, doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2006.07.001 and Money, Vol 18(2), 121-136. Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu (BDDK), www.bddk.org.tr, İnternet Adresi: http://www.bddk.org.tr/WebSitesi/default.aspx, Erişim Tarihi; 15.08.2015
  7. CHRONOPOULOS, Dimitris K.; LİU, Hong; MCMILLAN, Fiona J. ve WILSON, John O. S. (2015), "The Dynamics of US Bank Profitability", The European Finance, doi:10.1080/1351847X.2013.838184 of Vol 21(5), 426-443.
  8. ELSIEFY, Elsayed (2013), "Comparative Analysis of Qatari Islamic Banks Performance versus Conventional Banks Before,During and After the Financial Crisis", International Journal of Business and Commerce, Vol 3(3), 11-41.
  9. EROL, Cengiz; BAKLACİ, Hasan F; AYDOĞAN, Berna ve TUNÇ, Gökçe (2014), "Performance Comparison of Islamic (Participation) Banks and Commercial Banks in Turkish Banking Sector", EuroMed Journal of Business, Cilt 9(2), 114-128. doi:10.1108/EMJB-05-2013-0024
  10. GÜLHAN, Ünal ve UZUNLAR, Evcan (2011), "Bankacılık Sektöründe Kârlılığı Etkileyen Faktörler: Türk Bankacılık Sektörüne Yönelik Bir Uygulama/Factors Influencing th