SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Vegetable Supplier Evaluation By Using Grey Ahp and Aras-G For A Restaurant

GRİ AHS VE ARAS-G KULLANIMI İLE BİR RESTORAN İÇİN SEBZE TEDARİKÇİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ali Oğuz BAYRAKÇIL
Alptekin ULUTAŞ
Pages
1822017189–1822017204
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Secondly, there are few publications related to supplier

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, it is anymore necessity for companies to track and evaluate the performance of their suppliers of products or services in order to respond promptly and accurately to their customers' demands, reduce costs and improve product quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In supplier performance evaluation, many qualitative and quantitative criteria are considered and opinions of many decision makers are taken into account.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Secondly, there are few publications related to supplier
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays, it is anymore necessity for companies to track and evaluate the performance of their suppliers of products or services in order to respond promptly and accurately to their customers' demands, reduce costs and improve product quality. In supplier performance evaluation, many qualitative and quantitative criteria are considered and opinions of many decision makers are taken into account. Thus, in solving supplier performance evaluation problem, multi criteria decision-making methods and group decision-making methods are preferred. In this study, the performance of vegetable suppliers of a restaurant will be evaluated by using of Grey Analytical Hierarchy Process (Grey AHP) and Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) methods. This study has two contributions to the literature. Firstly, these two techniques used in this study are utilised together for the first time. Secondly, there are few publications related to supplier

Özet

Günümüzde, şirketlerin müşterilerinin isteklerine doğru ve hızlı bir şekilde cevap verebilmesi, maliyetlerini azaltması ve ürün kalitesini artırması için ürün veya hizmet tedarikçilerin performanslarını takip etmesi ve değerlendirmesi artık bir gereksinim haline gelmiştir. Tedarikçi performansının değerlendirilmesinde, birçok nitel ve nicel kriter dikkate alınmakta ve birden çok karar vericinin kararları hesaba katılmaktadır. Bundan dolayı, tedarikçi performansını değerlendirme probleminin çözümünde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemleri ve grup karar verme yöntemleri tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada bir restoranın sebze tedarikçilerinin performansları, Gri Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (Gri AHS) ve Gri Toplanan Oran Değerlendirmesi (ARAS-G) yöntemlerinin kullanımı ile değerlendirilecektir. Bu çalışmanın literatüre iki katkısı bulunmaktadır. Öncelikle bu çalışmada kullanılan iki yöntem ilk kez bir arada kullanılmakta; ikinci olarak, hizmet sektörü için yapılan tedarikçi performans değerlendirmesi ile ilgili yayınlar literatürde az sayıda bulunduğundan bu çalışmanın bir diğer katkısı da bu boşluğu doldurmak olacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKÇIL, A. O., ULUTAŞ, A. (2022). Vegetable Supplier Evaluation By Using Grey Ahp and Aras-G For A Restaurant. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 1822017189–1822017204. https://ajindex.com/articles/480657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AMİN, S. H., RAZMİ, J., & ZHANG, G. (2011). Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 334-342.
  2. AWASTHİ, A., & KANNAN, G. (2016). Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 100-108.
  3. BORAN, F. E., GENÇ, S., KURT, M., & AKAY, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
  4. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, G., & ÇİFÇİ, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
  5. CHAİ, J., LİU, J. N., & XU, Z. (2012). A new rule-based SIR approach to supplier selection under intuitionistic fuzzy environments. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(03), 451-471.
  6. CHEN, L. Y., & WANG, T. C. (2009). Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 233-242.
  7. CHOU, S. Y., & CHANG, Y. H. (2008). A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach. Expert systems with applications, 34(4), 2241-2253.
  8. DENG, X., HU, Y., DENG, Y., & MAHADEVAN, S. (2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 156-167.
  9. DWEİRİ, F., KUMAR, S., KHAN, S. A., & JAİN, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273-283.
  10. FALLAHPOUR, A., OLUGU, E. U., MUSA, S. N., KHEZRİMOTLAGH, D., & WONG, K. Y. (2016). An integrated model for green supplier selection under fuzzy environment: application of data envelopment analysis and genetic programming approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 707-725.
  11. GHODSYPOUR, S. H., & O'BRİEN, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International journal of production economics, 56, 199-212.
  12. HASHEMİ, S. H., KARİMİ, A., & TAVANA, M. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178-191.
  13. JADİDİ, O. M