Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Continuity Management in Family Firms

Aile İşletmelerinde Süreklilik Yönetimi

Pages
71–87
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then it reviews continuity management in the context of family firms, offers a conceptual model of continuity management for family firms, and concludes by discussing the implications of the study for further research and managerial practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Continuity management encompasses the efforts related to maintaining the knowledge, consequently, business continuity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Managing knowledge continuity is a prerequisite for managing business continuity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Then it reviews continuity management in the context of family firms, offers a conceptual model of continuity management for family firms, and concludes by discussing the implications of the study for further research and managerial practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Continuity management encompasses the efforts related to maintaining the knowledge, consequently, business continuity. Managing knowledge continuity is a prerequisite for managing business continuity. This article aims to conceptualize the continuity management process in organizations and clarify the implications of continuity management for family firms. Based on a literature review, the article evaluates the process and proposes a model for continuity management in organizations. Then it reviews continuity management in the context of family firms, offers a conceptual model of continuity management for family firms, and concludes by discussing the implications of the study for further research and managerial practice.

Özet

İşletmelerde süreklilik yönetimi, bilgi ve işletme sürekliliğini sağlamaya dönük çabaları ifade etmektedir. Bilgi sürekliliğinin sağlanması işletme sürekliliğinin sağlanmasının ön koşuludur. Bu çalışmanın amacı işletmelerdeki süreklilik yönetimi sürecini kavramsallaştırmak ve sürecin aile işletmeleri açısından ifade ettiği anlamı açıklığa kavuşturmaktır. Çalışmada öncelikle literatür değerlendirmesine dayalı olarak süreklilik yönetiminin temel konuları ele alınmakta, işletmelerdeki süreklilik yönetimi süreci değerlendirilmekte ve bir süreklilik yönetimi modeli geliştirilmektedir. Daha sonra ise süreklilik yönetimi aile işletmeleri bağlamında incelenerek bu işletmelerdeki süreklilik yönetimi için kavramsal bir model oluşturulmakta, çalışmanın araştırmacılara ve yöneticilere yönelik çıkarımları tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALKAN, V. D. (2022). Continuity Management in Family Firms. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 71–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/480268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AGRAWAL, Anand M. (2004), “Knowledge Management Application in Higher Technical Institutions in India”, International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) 13th International Conference Proceedings, Washington, USA, April 3-7 2004. Online [12.03.2005]:http://arago.cprost.sfu.ca/~smith/conference/viewpaper.php ?id=1180&cf=4 ALAVI, Maryam and Dorothy E. Leidner. (2001), “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 107-136.
  2. ARGOTE, Linda and Paul Ingram. (2000), “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 150-169.
  3. ATHANASSIOU, Nicholas, William. F. Crittenden, Louise. M. Kelly, and Pedro Marquez. (2002), “Founder Centrality Effects on the Mexican Family Firm’s Top Management Group: Firm Culture, Strategic Vision and Goals, and Firm Performance”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 37, No. 2, p. 139-150.
  4. BEAZLEY, Hamilton. (2003), “Knowledge Continuity: The New Competitive Advantage”, Executive Update Online, April 2003. Online [07.03.2005]:http://www.gwsae.org/executiveupdate/2003/April/knowle dge.htm BEAZLEY, Hamilton, Jeremiah Boenisch, and David Harden. (2002), Continuity Management: Preserving Corporate Knowledge and Productivity When Employees Leave, New York: John Wiley & Sons. BEAZLEY, Hamilton, Jeremiah Boenisch, and David Harden. (2003), “Knowledge Continuity: The New Management Function”, Journal of Organizational Excellence, Vol. 22, No. 3, Summer, p. 65-81.
  5. BEIJERSE, Roelef. P. uit. (2000), “Knowledge Management in Small and Medium-Sized Companies: Knowledge Management for Entrepreneurs”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 162-179.
  6. BENDER, Silke and Alan Fish. (2000), “The Transfer of Knowledge and the Retention of Expertise: The Continuing Need for Global Assignments”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 125-137.
  7. BJUGGREN, Per-Olof and Lars-Goran Sund. (2001), “Strategic Decision Making in Intergenerational Succession of Small and Medium Size Family-Owned Businesses”, Family Business Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 11-23.
  8. CABRERA-SUAREZ, Katiuska, Petra De Saa-Perez, and Desiderio Garcia- Almeida. (2001), “The Succession Process from a Resource and Knowledge Based View of the Family Firm”, Family Business Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 37-47.
  9. CADBURY, Adrian. (2000), Family Firms And Their Governance: Creating Tomorrow’s Company from To