SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Which Imaging Method to Choose for Detection of Bone Metastases? Bone Scintigraphy, CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT or MR?

KEMİK METASTAZLARININ TESPİTİNDE HANGİ GÖRÜNTÜLEME YÖNTEMİNİ SEÇELİM? KEMİK SİNTİGRAFİSİ, BT, 18F-FDG PET/BT VEYA MR?

Zekiye HASBEK
İsmail ŞALK
Birsen YÜCEL
Nalan Akgül BABACAN
Pages
44–50
Publication Date
2013-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we discuss these imaging technics and recommend imaging strategies for the detection of bone metastases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bone metastases are a common complication of cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Skeletal metastases are clinically significant because of associated symptoms, complications such as pathological fracture significance for staging, treatment and prognosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we discuss these imaging technics and recommend imaging strategies for the detection of bone metastases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Metastaz · Kemik · Sintigrafi

Abstract

Bone metastases are a common complication of cancer. Skeletal metastases are clinically significant because of associated symptoms, complications such as pathological fracture significance for staging, treatment and prognosis. Detection of bone metastases is, thus, an important part of treatment plannning. Four main modalities are available clinically: radiography, CT scan, nuclear imaging (Technetium-99m labeled diphosphonates and 18F- FDG PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging. In this review, we discuss these imaging technics and recommend imaging strategies for the detection of bone metastases.

Özet

Kemik metastazları kanserin sık görülen bir komplikasyonudur. Kemik metastazları klinik olarak önemlidir, çünkü ilişkili semptomlar, patolojik fraktür gibi komplikasyonlar evrele- me, tedavi ve prognoz için önemlidir. Bu yüzden, kemik metastazının deteksiyonu tedavi planının önemli bir parçasıdır. Dört asıl modalite klinik olarak kullanılır: radyografi, BT gö- rüntüleme, nükleer görüntüleme (Teknesyum-99m ile işaretli kemik sintigrafisi ve 18F- FDG PET/CT) ve manyetik rezonans görüntülemedir. Biz bu derlemede, kemik metastazla- rının deteksiyonu için bu görüntüleme tekniklerini ve önerilen görüntüleme stratejilerini tartıştık.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASBEK, Z., ŞALK, İ., YÜCEL, B., BABACAN, N. A. (2013). Which Imaging Method to Choose for Detection of Bone Metastases? Bone Scintigraphy, CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT or MR?. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 44–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/479793

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kılıçkap S, Taptan Ü, Yalçın S. Metastasis to Bone from Gastric Cancer: A Single Centre Experience. Cumhuriyet Med J 2010;32:192-8.
  2. Metler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Essentials of Nuclear Medicine Imaging. Chapter 8. Skeletal System. 6th ed. Elsevier Inc 2012;271-314.
  3. Andreula C, Murrone M. Metastatic Disease of the Spine. Eur Radiol 2005;15:627-32.
  4. Taoka T, Mayr NA, Lee HJ, Yuh WT, Simonson TM, Rezai K, Berbaum KS. Factors influencing visualization of Vertebral Metastases on MR Imaging versus Bone Scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176(6):1525 Tins BJ, Lalam RK, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Tyrrell PNM. Bone Metastases 2: Pelvis and Appendicular Skelton. Chapter 27. In: Davies AM, Sundaram M, James SLJ (eds). Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009:48250 Choi J, Raghavan M. Diagnostic Imaging and ImageGuide Therapy of Skeletal Metastases. Cancer Control 2012;19(2):102-12.
  5. Tyrrell PNM, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Lalam RK, Tins BJ. Bone Metastases 1: Spine. Chapter 26. In: Davies AM, Sundaram M, James SLJ (eds). Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009:461-79. Gonzáles-Sistal A, Sánchez AB, Carnero MH, Morell ÁR. Advances in Medical Imaging Applied to Bone Metastases. Medical Imaging 2011:339-54.
  6. Yang HL, Liu T, Wang XM, Yu Y, Deng SM. Diagnosis of Bone Metastases: a Meta-analysis comparing 18FDG PET, CT, MRI and Bone Scintigraphy. Eur Radiol 20 21:2604-17.
  7. Gandage SG, Kachewar SG, Aironi VD, Nagapurkar AD. A comparative Study of Whloe Body DWIBS MRI versus Bone Scan for Evaluating Skeletal Metastases. Australas Med J 2012;5(12):619-22.
  8. Qu X, Huang X, Yan W, Wu L, Dai K. A Metaanalysis of 18FDG-PET-CT, 18FDG-PET, MRI and Bone Scintigraphy for Diagnosis of Bone Metastases in Patients with Lung Cancer. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(5):1007-15.
  9. Nagamachi S, Wakamatsu H, Kiyohara S, Nishii R, Mizutani Y, Fujita S, et al. Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Capabilities of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 131I-scintigraphy, and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Postoperative Thyroid Cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2011,29:413-22.
  10. Liu T, Cheng T, Xu W, Yan WL, Liu J, Yang HL. A Meta-analysis of 18FFDG-PET, MRI and Bone Scintigraphy for Diagnosis of Bone Metastases in Patients with Breast Cancer. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:523-31
  11. Zamagni E, Nanni C, Patriarca F, Englaro E, Castelluci P, Geatti O, et al. A Prospective Comparision of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Magneti