The rates of neonatal intensive care needs in the postpartum period were 3.2 % in thevaginal delivery group and 4.6 % in the cesarean delivery group, approximately were similar for both groups.Conclusion: Dinoprostone is safe and efficient agent used for cervical maturation and labor induction at
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study, is to evaluate the epidemiologic and clinical of pregnancy cases who arenulliparous and postdate with labor induction of prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) in the last 2 years in ourhospital.Materials and Methods: In my study, I examined 136 nullipar pregnants who were given induction withdinoprostone due to postdate (gestational week ≥ 41 weeks).Results: The rate of cesarean delivery who dinoprostone applied, in nulliparous and postdate pregnancieswas 31.6 %.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fetal distress (48.8 %), failure for laborprogression (32.5 %) and cephalopelvic disproportion (18.6 %) were the most frequent indications forcesarean delivery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The rates of neonatal intensive care needs in the postpartum period were 3.2 % in thevaginal delivery group and 4.6 % in the cesarean delivery group, approximately were similar for both groups.Conclusion: Dinoprostone is safe and efficient agent used for cervical maturation and labor induction at
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EBELİK HEMŞİRELİK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN GENETİĞİ DEĞİŞTİRİLMİŞ ORGANİZMALARA (GDO) YÖNELİK BİLGİ DÜZEYLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ Determination Of Knowledge Levels For Genetically Modified Organism (Gmo) Of Midnight Nursing Students · Labor induction · prostaglandin E
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study, is to evaluate the epidemiologic and clinical of pregnancy cases who arenulliparous and postdate with labor induction of prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) in the last 2 years in ourhospital.Materials and Methods: In my study, I examined 136 nullipar pregnants who were given induction withdinoprostone due to postdate (gestational week ≥ 41 weeks).Results: The rate of cesarean delivery who dinoprostone applied, in nulliparous and postdate pregnancieswas 31.6 %. The patients who delivered vaginally after dinoprostone induction were compared with thosewho delivered by cesarean section after dinoprostone induction. Fetal distress (48.8 %), failure for laborprogression (32.5 %) and cephalopelvic disproportion (18.6 %) were the most frequent indications forcesarean delivery. The rates of neonatal intensive care needs in the postpartum period were 3.2 % in thevaginal delivery group and 4.6 % in the cesarean delivery group, approximately were similar for both groups.Conclusion: Dinoprostone is safe and efficient agent used for cervical maturation and labor induction at
ERKEK, Z. Y., OKAN, F. (2019). Effect of Prostaglandin E2 on Labor Induction in Postdate, Nulliparous Pregnancies. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 76–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/479253
Petrillo M, Angers-Loustau A, Henriksson P, Bonfini L, Patak A, Kreysa J. GMO-Amplicons: a collection of nucleic acid sequences related to genetically modified organisms. Database. 2015: 1–11 doi: 10.1093/database/bav101
Sürmeli H, Şahin F. Üniversite öğrencilerinin biyoteknoloji çalışmalarına yönelik bilgi ve görüşleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi.2009; 3(37):33-45
Özdemir O, Duran M. Biyoteknolojik uygulamalara ve genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalara (GDO) ilişkin tüketici davranışları. Akademik Gıda. 2010;8(5): 20-28
Özden M, Akgün A, Çinici A, Gülmez H, Demirtaş F. 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar (GDO) hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri ve biyoteknolojiye yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013; 3 (2):94-115
Sinan O.Öğrencilerin biyoteknoloji ile ilgili bilgi ve tutumların farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (YYU Journal Of Education Faculty). 2015;12(1):183-201
Gunter B, Kinderlerer J, Beyleveld D. Teenagers and biotechnology: A survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Studies in Science Education. 1998; 32:81–112
Usak M, Erdogan M, Prokop P, Ozel M. High school and university students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochemistry And Molecular Biology Education. 2009; 37(2):123–130
Oğur S, Aksoy A, Yılmaz Z. Üniversite öğrencilerinin genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar ve gıdalar hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri ve tutumları: Bitlis eren üniversitesi örneği. Journal of Food and Health Science, 3(3): 97-108 (2017
Tekedere H, Taban B, Çalışkan M, Demirtola H. Sağlık hizmetleri meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalarla ilgili eğitim ihtiyaçlarının analizi. TÜRK FEN Eğitimi Dergisi.2011;8(11):142-156
Saez MJ, Nino AG, Carretero A. Matching society values: Students’ views of biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education. 2008; 30 (2 ):167-183