Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Body Measurements and Body Indices in the Pasundan Cows

Pages
49–55
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the seven body measurements is important for describing body conformation of Pasundan cows such as body size (PC1) and body shape (PC2).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Principal component analysis (PCA) is important for describing the body conformation in livestock.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total of seven body measurements and thirteen body indices parameters from 144 heads of Pasundan cow (average 3 years age) at West Java Province of Indonesia were used in this study for PCA analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the seven body measurements is important for describing body conformation of Pasundan cows such as body size (PC1) and body shape (PC2).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Body measurements · Body indices · Body conformation

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) is important for describing the body conformation in livestock. Total of seven body measurements and thirteen body indices parameters from 144 heads of Pasundan cow (average 3 years age) at West Java Province of Indonesia were used in this study for PCA analysis. The body measurements in this study consisted of withers height (WH), body length (BL), chest girth (CG), chest width (CW), rump height (RH), rump width (RW) and rump length (RL). Therefore the body indices in this study consisted of height slope (HS), width slope (WS), body index (BI), area index (AI), rump length index (RLI), conformation index (CI), length index (LI), body ratio (BR), proportionality (Pr), thoracic development (TD), pelvic index (PI), transverse pelvic (TP) and longitudinal pelvic (LP). The highest of Pearson’s coefficient of correlations (r) value in body measurements was showed between WH and RH (0.93). Hence, the highest r value in body indices was showed between WS and TP (0.86). The PCA for body measurements and body measurements was revealed two factors of PC1 (WH, BL, RH) and PC2 (CG, CW, RW, RL) that explained about 73.36% of the total variation. Meanwhile, the PCA for body indices was revealed four factors of PC1 (BI, AI, RLI, LI, Pr, LP), PC2 (CI, TD), PC3 (WS, PI, TP) and PC4 (HS, BR) that explained about 89.38% of the total variation. It was concluded that the seven body measurements is important for describing body conformation of Pasundan cows such as body size (PC1) and body shape (PC2).

🔖

Cite This Article

PUTRA, W. P. B., SAİD, S., ARİFİN, J. (2020). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Body Measurements and Body Indices in the Pasundan Cows. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/478327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adinata Y, Aryogi, Pamungkas D, Luthfi M, Rasyid A, Krishna NH. 2016. Phenotypic characterization of Jawa Brebes (Jabres) cattle. In: Proceedings of the International Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology; 2016 August 10-12;
  2. Bali, Indonesia; p. 24-29.
  3. Agung PP, Ferdy S, Moch SAZ, Ari SW, Widya PBP, Syahruddin S, Jakaria. 2019. Genetic diversity of Indonesian cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 32: 467-476. Alderson GLH. 1999. The development of a system of linear measurements to provode an assessment of type and function of beef cattle. Anim Genet Res, 25: 45-55.
  4. Arifin J, Sri BK, Endang YS, Unang Y, Asep A, Indrijani, Sulasmi. 2015. The gene distribution, equilibrium law, and effective population size of post migration of Pasundan cattle at Majalengka Regency. JIT, 15: 1-7.
  5. Birteeb PT, Lomo R. 2015. Phenotypic characterization and weight estimation from linear body traits of West African Dwarf goats reared in the traditional zone of Ghana. Livest Res Rur Dev, 27. Birteeb PT, Sunday OP, Michael OO. 2014. Analysis of the body structure of Djallonke sheep using multideterminant approach. Anim Genet Res, 54: 65-72. Boujenane I. 2014. Multivariate characterisation of Oulmes-Zaer and Tidili cattle using the morphological traits. Iranian J Appl Anim Sci, 5: 293-299.
  6. Boujenane I. Derqaoui L, Nouamane G. 2016. Morphological differentiation between two Morrocan goat breeds. J Livest Sci Tech, 4: 31-38.
  7. Ferreira TA, Idalmo GP, Aurora MGG, Aldrin VP, Olivardo F, Camila TM, Iraides FFG, Maria PSLMPG. 2013. Morphological traits and type of dairy goats registered in Brazil from 1976 to 2009. R Bras Zootec, 42: 857-861.
  8. Gunawan A, Sulasmi, Kasita L, Jakaria. 2016. Studi karakteristik ukuran tubuh dan indeks morfometrik sapi Bali dan PO. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peternakan Berkelanjutan VIII. 2016 Nov 16; Sumedang, Indonesia; p. 647-653.
  9. Hartatik T, Dwi NHH, Yudi A. 2019. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of two Indonesian local cattle breeds based on Cytochrome b gene sequences. Biodiversitas, 20: 17-22.
  10. Heryani LGSS, Susari NNW, Gunawan IWNF. 2018. Principals components variables of Taro white cattle morphometrics based on body measurements. Bulet Vet Udayana, 10: 93-99.
  11. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 2002. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, USA. Karacaoren B, Kadarmideen HN. 2008. Principal component and clustering analysis of functional traits in Swiss dairy cattle. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci, 32: