SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

-

Sürgü Baraj Gölü (Malatya –Türkiye)’nün Zooplankton

Necla İpek ALIŞ
Serap SALER
Pages
39–43
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All of the zooplanktonic species have been detected for the first time in Sürgü Dam Lake. pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature were measured during field studies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was completed with monthly surveys in Sürgü Dam Lake between June 2011 and July 2012 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the study, a total of 47 zooplankton species (31 species belong to Rotifera, 10 to Cladocera and six Copepoda) were identified in Sürgü Dam Lake.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All of the zooplanktonic species have been detected for the first time in Sürgü Dam Lake. pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature were measured during field studies
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rotifera · Cladocera · Copepoda

Abstract

This study was completed with monthly surveys in Sürgü Dam Lake between June 2011 and July 2012 period. During the study, a total of 47 zooplankton species (31 species belong to Rotifera, 10 to Cladocera and six Copepoda) were identified in Sürgü Dam Lake. Based on the number of individuals, Rotifera (65.95%) were the dominant group in the dam lake followed by Cladocera (21.27%) and Copepoda (12.76%). All of the zooplanktonic species have been detected for the first time in Sürgü Dam Lake. pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature were measured during field studies

Özet

Bu çalışma Haziran 2011- Temmuz 2012 tarihleri arasında aylık alınan örneklerle tamamlanmıştır. Çalışma süresince Sürgü Baraj Gölü’nde toplam 47 zooplankton türü (31 tür Rotifera, 10 tür Cladocera ve 6 tür Copepoda teşhis edilmiştir. Birey sayısı bakımından Rotifera dominant grup olup (% 65,95) Cladocera (%21,27) ve Copepoda (%12,76) onu izlemiştir. Sürgü Baraj Gölü’nde saptanan bütün zooplanktonik türler gölde ilk kayıttır. pH çözünmüş oksijen ve su sıcaklığı çalışma esnasında ölçülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ALIŞ, N. İ., SALER, S. (2013). -. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/478167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Berzins B., Pejler B. 1987.
  2. Rotifer Occurrence in Relation to pH, Hydrobiology, 147: 107-116. Herzig A. 1987. The analysis of planktonic rotifers populations.A plea for long-term investigations, Hydrobiologia, 147:163-187. Saksena N.D. 1987. Rotifers as indicator of water quality, Hydrobiology, 15: 481-485. Gündüz E. 1997. A List for Cladocera (Crustacea) of Turkish Inland Waters, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 21: 37-45. Bekleyen A. 2003. A Taxonomical study on the zooplankton of Göksu Dam Lake, (Diyarbakır), Turkish Journal of Zoology, 27: 95-100. 6. Ustaoğlu R.M. 2004. A Check-list for zooplankton of Turkish inland waters. Ege University, Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 21:(3-4), 191-199. Yiğit S. 2006. Analysis of the zooplankton community by the Shannon-Weaver Index in Kesikköprü Dam Lake, Turkey, Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12:(2), 216-220. 8. Tellioğlu A., Akman F. 2007. A Taxonomical study on the Rotifera fauna in Pertek Region of Keban Dam Lake, Ege Universty Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 24:(1-2) 135-136. Saler S. 2009. Rotifers of Kepektaş Dam Lake, (Elazığ-Turkey), Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction A1, 33: 121-126
  3. Saler S., İpek N., Eroğlu, M. 2010. Rotifers of Battalgazi Region Karakaya Dam Lake, Journal of New World Sciences Academy, Ecological Sciences, 5: 3. Dorak Z., Gaygusuz Ö., Tarkan A.S., Aydın H., 2013. Diurnal vertical distribution of zooplankton in a newly formed reservoir(Ta htalı Reservoir, Kocaeli): the role of abiotic factors and chlorophyll a.Turkish Journal of Zoology, 37: 218-227 http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sürgü_Barajı (Accessed on 14.01.2013) Edmondson W.T. 1959.
  4. Fresh Water Biology, Second edition,University of Washington, Seattle Scourfield D.J., Hardig J.P. 1966.
  5. Freshwater Biology, Science Publication, NewYork. Dussart B. 1969. Les Copepodes des Eaux Continentales d’Europe Occidentale Tale II Cyclopoides et Biologie, N.Boubee et Cie, Paris. Flössner D. 1972.
  6. Krebstiere, Crustacea. Kiemen and Blattfüsser Brachiopoda Fischlause, Branchiura, Tierwelt-Deutschlands, 60. Tiel Veb. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Harding J.P., Smith W.A. 1974.
  7. A Key to the British Freshwater, Biological Association Scientific Publication, No: 18, Westmorland. Kiefer F. 1978. Das Zooplankton der Binnengewasser, 2. Teil, Freilebende Band XXVI, Stutgart Koste W.1978a. Die Radertiere Mitteleuropas I. Textband, Berlin. Koste W. 1978b Die Radertiere Mitteleuropas II.