Journals / Cumhuriyet Science Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of noise pollution level from traffic for Sivas city using GISbased noise indexes

Pages
176–184
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Noise pollution is the most important factorthat disrupts environmental quality and environmental health in the city center.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study with the purpose of determining the noise pollution originating from traffic inSivas city center, noise measurements were performed in 14 different points that represent thecity for 5 days in morning, noon and evening.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Level ofequivalent continuous noise (Leq) value is above limit values in all regions and its meandetermined for morning, noon and evening hours as 75.19, 73.72 and 75.92 dB respectively.The highest Lnp values are calculated as 96,8 dB for morning, 98,7 dB for noon and 97 dB forevening.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Noise pollution is the most important factorthat disrupts environmental quality and environmental health in the city center.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study with the purpose of determining the noise pollution originating from traffic inSivas city center, noise measurements were performed in 14 different points that represent thecity for 5 days in morning, noon and evening. Based on the measurement results, GIS basednoise pollution spatial distribution maps were created and also the noise levels and orbits thatchange according to the time as time-wise and spatial were determined. Also, noise pollutionlevel of city is revealed with calculating indexes such as traffic noise pollution index (NI),noise climate (NC), noise exposure index (NEI) and level of noise pollution (Lnp). Level ofequivalent continuous noise (Leq) value is above limit values in all regions and its meandetermined for morning, noon and evening hours as 75.19, 73.72 and 75.92 dB respectively.The highest Lnp values are calculated as 96,8 dB for morning, 98,7 dB for noon and 97 dB forevening. The highest NC values are calculated as 18,7 dB for morning, 21,3 dB for noon and21 dB for evening. Almost all of the NEI values were more than 1 and this shows that the levelof noise exposure of all measuring points is at excessive level. The NI value which is calculatedaccording to the measurements is usually above 74 dB. The areas affected by noise within theboundaries of Sivas city were revealed by using the noise distribution maps obtained with thehelp of GIS. When all of the results are evaluated, it is seen that there is a serious noisepollution problem around the traffic way of city. Noise pollution is the most important factorthat disrupts environmental quality and environmental health in the city center.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKUŞ, C. B., YILDIZ, S. (2022). Evaluation of noise pollution level from traffic for Sivas city using GISbased noise indexes. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 176–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/477696

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Guzejev M., Vuorinenv H.S., Kaprio J., Heikkila K. and Rauhamaa H. Self-report of transportation noise exposure, annoyance and noise sensitıvıty in relation to noise map information. J. Sound. Vib., 234 (2000) 191-206
  2. Cunniff P.F. Tranportation noise, environmental noise pollution. John-Wiley & Sons Inc., Canada, (1977) 151-175
  3. Pandey V. Encyclopaedic dictionary of environmental pollution, New Delhi: Himalaya. Publishing House, (1992)
  4. Yılmaz H. and Özer S. Evaluation of noise pollution in the respect of landscape planning and solution proposals. Atatürk Univ. Agric. Fac. J., 28 (1998) 515-530
  5. Lercher P. Environmental noise and health: an integrated research perspective. Environ. Inter., 22 (1995) 17-129
  6. Pathak V., Tripathi B.D. and Mishra V.K. Evaluation of traffic noise pollution and attitudes of exposed individuals in working place. Atmosph. Environ., 42 (2008) 3892-3898
  7. WHO. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance: World Health Organization, 2000
  8. Ener G. Investigation of the effects of bridge junctions on environmental traffic noise levels. Gazi University, Institute of Science and Technology, Master Thesis, 2006; p106
  9. Aktürk N., Akdemir O. and Üzkurt İ. Environmental noise pollution caused by traffic light times. Gazi Un. J. Fac. Eng. Arc., 18 (2003) 71-87
  10. Chakraborty A. and Basu R. The effects of noise pollution on auto-driver’s health in selected auto-routes: the case of Kolkata municipial. Cor. J. Arts Sci. Com., 5 (2015) 120-132
  11. Evans G.W. and Hygge S., Noise and performance in children and adults, In Prasher D, (Eds.), Handbook of Noise and Health (2000)
  12. Yılmaz H. and Özer S. Evaluation of noise pollution in terms of landscape planning and solution suggestions. J. Fac. Agri., 28 (1997) 515-531
  13. Funda Y.O. Investigation of the effects of exposure to noise on hearing and its relationship with smoking and cotinine. Abant İzzet Baysal University, Otorhinolaryngology Department Specialist Thesis, 2012; p103
  14. Maschke C., Rupp T. and Hecht K. The influence of stressors on biochemical reactions- a review of present scientific findings with noise. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health., 203 (2000) 45-53
  15. Donoghue A.M. Occupational health hazards in mining: an overview. Occup. Medic., 54 (2004) 283-289
  16. Long M. Architectural Acoustics. Burlington: Elsevier Academic, 2006
  17. Aslan Ş. and Yıldız S. Noise pollution assessment in wastewater and potable water