Journals / Cumhuriyet Science Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

Experimental evaluation and genetic programming based modeling of the compressive strength of concretes produced with various strength classes of cements

Pages
482–492
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed that there is a highcorrelation between experimental and predicted values obtained from the proposed GEPmodel.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to propose a prediction model for estimation of strength of concretes withvarious cements and mixture proportions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The strength of the samples produced with threedifferent types of cement at different rates of water-to-cement ratios and cement richness wereinvestigated experimentally and evaluated statistically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed that there is a highcorrelation between experimental and predicted values obtained from the proposed GEPmodel.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to propose a prediction model for estimation of strength of concretes withvarious cements and mixture proportions. The strength of the samples produced with threedifferent types of cement at different rates of water-to-cement ratios and cement richness wereinvestigated experimentally and evaluated statistically. Three type of cement possessing 28-day strengths of 32.5, 42.5, and 52.5 MPa was used in the production of concretes. Theconcretes were produced at cement richness values of 300, 400, and 500 kg/m3 and w/c ratesat changing levels within the interval of between 0.3 and 0.6. By this way, combined influencesof cement strength, amount of cement and w/c ratio was experimentally investigated. Totally36 mixes were cast then the compressive strength values were examined after specified moistcuring periods (7 and 28 day). A statistical study were conducted on the experimental resultsand the significances of the cement strength, w/c values and amount of cement on thecompressive strength of the concretes were assessed. Another crucial focus of the current paperis to generate an explicit expression to predict the compressive strength of the concretestackled with the current study. To derive an explicit formula for estimation, a soft computingmethod called gene expression programming (GEP) was benefited. The GEP model was alsocompared with a less complicated estimation model developed by multi linear regressionmethod. The results revealed that compressive strength of the samples were significantlyinfluenced by cement type and aggregate-to-cement ratio. It was observed that there is a highcorrelation between experimental and predicted values obtained from the proposed GEPmodel.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERMERDAŞ, K., İPEK, S., BOZGEYİK, B. (2022). Experimental evaluation and genetic programming based modeling of the compressive strength of concretes produced with various strength classes of cements. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 482–492. https://ajindex.com/articles/477641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. BS EN 197–1, Cement: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements British Standards Institution,London, 2000
  2. Hirschi T., Sika Concrete Handbook Sika Services AG, Zurique, Suíça, 2005
  3. Mermerdaş K., Gesoğlu M., Güneyisi E., Özturan T., Strength development of concretes incorporated with metakaolin and different types of calcined kaolins. Constr. Build. Mater., 37 (2012) 766-774
  4. Sayed M. A., Statistical modelling and prediction of compressive strength of concrete.Concrete. Research Letters, 3(2) (2003) 452-458
  5. Deshpande N., Londhe S., Kulkarni S., Modeling compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete by Artificial Neural Network, Model Tree and Nonlinear Regression, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment.3(2) (2014) 187–198
  6. Chandwani V., Agrawal V., Nagar R. Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Modeling Compressive Strength of Concrete: A State of the Art Review. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 4 (2014) 2949-2956
  7. Topçu İ.B., Boğa A.R., Hocaoğlu FO., Modeling corrosion currents of reinforced concrete using ANN. Automat. in Constr., 18(2) (2009) 145–52
  8. Lim C.H., Yoon Y.S., Kim J.H., Genetic algorithm in mix proportioning of high performance concrete. Cem. Concr. Res., 34(3) (2004) 409–20
  9. Fairbairn E.M.R., Silvoso M.M., Filho R.D.T, Alves J.L.D., Ebecken N.F.F. Optimization of mass concrete construction using genetic algorithms. Comput. Struct., 82(2-3) (2004) 281–99
  10. Özcan F., Atis C., Karahan O., Uncuoglu E., Tanyildizi H., Comparison of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic models for prediction of long term compressive strength of silica fume concrete, Advances in Engineering Software, 40 (2009) 856–863
  11. İnan G., Göktepe A.B., Ramyar K., Sezer A. Prediction of sulfate expansion of PC mortar using adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology. Build Environ 42(3) (2007) 1264–69
  12. Shahin M.A., Maier H.R. and Jaksa M.B., Predicting settlement of Shallow Foundations using Neural Networks, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128(9) (2002) 785-793
  13. Topçu İ.B., Sarıdemir M., Prediction of properties of waste AAC aggregate concrete using artificial neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci., 41(1) (2007) 117–25
  14. Topçu İ.B., Sarıdemir M., Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Comput. Mater. Sci.;41(3) (2008) 305–11
  15. Adhikary B.