Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

A Taxonomy of Massive Open Online Courses

Pages
223–240
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This classification provides a comprehensive description of different types of MOOCs which could be helpful to answer the necessities of MOOC providers, educators, students, and researchers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as a new approach to distance education, which originated from the open education resources (OER) movement, are becoming widespread throughout the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Over time, early versions of cMOOCs have undergone changes in terms of use, name and structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This classification provides a comprehensive description of different types of MOOCs which could be helpful to answer the necessities of MOOC providers, educators, students, and researchers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as a new approach to distance education, which originated from the open education resources (OER) movement, are becoming widespread throughout the world. Over time, early versions of cMOOCs have undergone changes in terms of use, name and structure. In their short life, MOOCs have been categorized into different taxonomies depending on, for example, their types, pedagogies, orientations, target participants, resources and content. This article proposes a new taxonomy to position MOOCs on two dimensions: massiveness and openness, which brings a fresh perspective for understanding varieties of MOOCs based on the two definitional elements. The dimensions of massiveness and openness are identified and discussed. Based on these, we conclude two dimensional matrix with four categories: (i) small scale and less open, (ii) small scale and more open, (iii) large scale and less open, (iv) large scale and more open. This classification provides a comprehensive description of different types of MOOCs which could be helpful to answer the necessities of MOOC providers, educators, students, and researchers.

🔖

Cite This Article

PİLLİ, O., ADMİRAAL, W. (2022). A Taxonomy of Massive Open Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 223–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/476646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in massive open online courses. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning (EJEL), 13(4), 207-216.
  2. Arbaugh, J.B. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 435-447.
  3. Bates, T. (2014). Comparing xMOOCs and cMOOCs: Philosophy and practice. Online Learning and Distance Education Resources. Retrieved on 8 June 2016 from http://www. tonybates.ca/2014/10/13/comparing-xmoocs-and-cmoocs-philosophy-and-practice/ Bell, F. (2010). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118.
  4. Clark, D. (2013). MOOCs: Taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Retrieved on 8 June 2016 from http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=MOOCs:+taxonomy
  5. Clark, D. (2014). MOOCs: Who's using MOOCs? 10 different target audiences. Retrieved on 8 June 2016 from http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com.cy/2013/04/moocs-whos-usingmoocs-10-different.html
  6. Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. e-Lis. Retrieved on 8 June 2016 from http://eprints. rclis.org/19388/ Creative Commons (2016). Retrieved on 8 June 2016 from https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/ Dillahunt, T. R., Wang, B. Z., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 178-196.
  7. Ebben, M. & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. doi: 10.1080/ 17439884.2013.878352 Fitzgerald, M. (2013). Rise of the corporate MOOC. Information Week. Retrieved on 8 June 2016 from http://www.informationweek.com/strategic-cio/team-building-andstaffing/rise-of-the-corporate-mooc/d/d-id/1112784
  8. Gilliot, J.-M., Garlatti, S., Rebai, I., & Belen-Sapia, M. (2013, May 28). The concept of iMOOC for mastered opening (French: Le concept de iMOOC pour une ouverture maîtrisée). Paper presented at the MOOC workshop at the EIAH'2013.
  9. Toulouse, France. Glance, D. G., Forsey, M. & Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, 18(5-6). DOI:10.5210/fm.v18i5.4350 Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W. S. (2014).