Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between Perceived Parental Control and Internet Addiction: A Cross-sectional study among Adolescents

Pages
55–74
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found thatparental psychological control explained nearly 18% of the total variance in internetaddiction and mothers are perceived as significantly more psychologically controlling ininternet addiction than fathers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the relationship between parental psychological andbehavioral control which the adolescents perceived from their parents and internetaddiction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It employed relational survey model and was carried out with the participationof a total of 356 students (female=205, male=151) aged 14-18.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found thatparental psychological control explained nearly 18% of the total variance in internetaddiction and mothers are perceived as significantly more psychologically controlling ininternet addiction than fathers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between parental psychological andbehavioral control which the adolescents perceived from their parents and internetaddiction. It employed relational survey model and was carried out with the participationof a total of 356 students (female=205, male=151) aged 14-18. Correlation and regressionanalyses were utilized to determine the level and direction of the relationship between theirperceived parental psychological and behavioral control, and internet addiction. The resultsyielded a positive, medium-level and meaningful relation between them. It was found thatparental psychological control explained nearly 18% of the total variance in internetaddiction and mothers are perceived as significantly more psychologically controlling ininternet addiction than fathers. Also, the relationship between parental behavioral controland the level of adolescents’ internet addiction was found negative and non-significant.Consequently, it was noted that perceived parental psychological control was effective inadolescents’ internet addiction tendencies, whereas behavioral control did not producesuch effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

Cetinkaya, L. (2022). The Relationship between Perceived Parental Control and Internet Addiction: A Cross-sectional study among Adolescents. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 55–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/476596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Aksoy, A. B., Kahraman, O. G., & Kilic, S. (2008). Ebeveynlerin algiladiklari ebeveyn izleme ve destek davranislari [Parental monitoring and support behaviors perceived by adolescents]. Inonu Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 9(15), 1-14. Retrieved on 22 July 2018 from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/92324
  2. Alvarez, M., Torres, A., Rodriguez, E., Padilla, S., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2013). Attitudes and parenting dimensions in parents’ regulation of Internet use by primary and secondary school children. Computers & Education, 67, 69-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2013.03.005 Anderson K. J. (2001). Internet use among college students: an exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 50(1), 21-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07448480109595707 Ang, R. P., Chong, W. H., Chye, S., & Huan, V. S. (2012). Loneliness and generalized problematic Internet use: Parents’ perceived knowledge of adolescents’ online activities as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1342-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.chb. 2012.02.019 Austin, E. W. (1990). Effects of family communication on children's interpretation of television. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant (Eds.), Television and the American family (pp. 377-395).
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ayas, T. & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Internet addiction and internet parental style of primary school students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(39), 46-57. Retrieved on 20 July 2018 from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/200124
  4. Bakken, I. J., Wenzel, H. G., Gotestam, K. G., Johansson, A., & Oren, A. (2009). Internet addiction among Norwegian adults: A stratified probability sample study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 121-127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9450.2008.00685.x Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296-3319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996. tb01915.x Barber, B. K. (1999). Political violence, family relations, and Palestinian youth functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(2), 206-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0743558499142004
  5. Barber, B. K. (2001). Political violence, social, integration, and youth functioning: Palestinian youth from the intifada. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(3), 259-280. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1002/jcop.1017 Barber, B. K. (2002). Intrusive parenting: How psycho- logical control affects children and adolescen