Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

An Experimental Study of the Effect of Computer Assisted Learning on Metacognitive Performance Development in Psychology Teaching

Pages
94–105
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study showed that the studentswho completed the structured learning assignments as computer-based, self-learningenvironment showed better metacognition performance than those in the self-managedgroup, who did not engage with the online platform, even though there was no significantdifference between the groups regarding competence on the course’s learning objectives.The current experiment offers an empirical validation for why instructors should usetechnology as a self-regulatory tool that enhances students’ metacognitive performanceand competence of learning outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is a growing interest in the use of computer-based learning environments toenhance learning in higher education, but the implications of this on the improvement ofmetacognition in higher education have yet to be adequately explored.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the currentstudy, 175 students who enrolled in an introductory psychology course were randomlyassigned to experimental and control groups (computer-assisted vs. self-managed).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study showed that the studentswho completed the structured learning assignments as computer-based, self-learningenvironment showed better metacognition performance than those in the self-managedgroup, who did not engage with the online platform, even though there was no significantdifference between the groups regarding competence on the course’s learning objectives.The current experiment offers an empirical validation for why instructors should usetechnology as a self-regulatory tool that enhances students’ metacognitive performanceand competence of learning outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the use of computer-based learning environments toenhance learning in higher education, but the implications of this on the improvement ofmetacognition in higher education have yet to be adequately explored. In the currentstudy, 175 students who enrolled in an introductory psychology course were randomlyassigned to experimental and control groups (computer-assisted vs. self-managed). In thecomputer-assisted condition, besides the lecture delivered four hours per week and forthree months in total, students took a set of assignments based on evidence-basedteaching in a computer-based environment. The control group, however, took theseassignments as in-and-out class activities without using a computer environment. Anassessment based on Bloom’s taxonomy was utilized to obtain metacognitive andcompetency scores for both groups. The results of the study showed that the studentswho completed the structured learning assignments as computer-based, self-learningenvironment showed better metacognition performance than those in the self-managedgroup, who did not engage with the online platform, even though there was no significantdifference between the groups regarding competence on the course’s learning objectives.The current experiment offers an empirical validation for why instructors should usetechnology as a self-regulatory tool that enhances students’ metacognitive performanceand competence of learning outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOYMAK, A. (2022). An Experimental Study of the Effect of Computer Assisted Learning on Metacognitive Performance Development in Psychology Teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 94–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/476592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Azevedo, R. (2002). Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Computers as metacognitive tools to enhance learning? Instructional Science, 30, 31-45.
  2. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193-197. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004 Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
  3. Azevedo, R. & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition– Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5), 367-379.
  4. Ball, L. & Stacey, K. (2005). Teaching strategies for developing judicious technology use. Technology-Supported Mathematics Learning Environments (2005 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook, pp. 3-15).
  5. Reston, VA: NCTM. Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1-22.
  6. Brinol, P. & DeMarree, K. G. (2012). Social metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.
  7. Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: Implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 368- 381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024
  8. Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence‐based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121.
  9. Dunn, D. S., Saville, B. K., Baker, S. C., & Marek, P. (2013). Evidence-based teaching: Tools and techniques that promote learning in the psychology classroom. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 5-13. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12004
  10. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  11. Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255-268.
  12. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive– developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906. Groccia, J. E. & Buskist, W. (2011). Need for evidence‐based teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 5-11.
  13. Haladyna, T. M. (1999). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Shadiev, R., & Li, J. S. (2011). Effects of reviewing a