Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Technology-enhanced Self-directed Language Learning Behaviors of EFL Student Teachers

Pages
229–245
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The qualitativefindings also show that students engage in a variety of self-directed language learningactivities outside the classroom mostly by using technology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education not only requires students to receive in-classinstruction but also necessitates them to engage in extra practices outside the classroomby using technological or non-technological resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The quantitative data were collected from 110 EFLstudent teachers by using two distinct research instruments, whereas the qualitative datawere collected through an open-ended questionnaire form, responded by 47 of thesestudents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The qualitativefindings also show that students engage in a variety of self-directed language learningactivities outside the classroom mostly by using technology.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education not only requires students to receive in-classinstruction but also necessitates them to engage in extra practices outside the classroomby using technological or non-technological resources. Hence, this study aimed toinvestigate the self-directed language learning behaviors of the EFL student teachers andtheir use of technology in the process by employing a mixed-methods study within anexplanatory sequential research design. The quantitative data were collected from 110 EFLstudent teachers by using two distinct research instruments, whereas the qualitative datawere collected through an open-ended questionnaire form, responded by 47 of thesestudents. The results of the study indicated that technology utilization is a significantpredictor of self-directed language learning. However, the findings show that the offcampus self-directed language learning abilities of the students, with or without the use oftechnology, do not significantly differ according to gender, age, and grade levels. Thedifferences were only found in terms of unaided off-campus learning abilities of thestudents and their technology utilization frequency in language learning. The qualitativefindings also show that students engage in a variety of self-directed language learningactivities outside the classroom mostly by using technology.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yelken, T. Y., Akay, C., Haidari, S. M. (2022). Technology-enhanced Self-directed Language Learning Behaviors of EFL Student Teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 229–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/476591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Buitrago, A. G. (2017) Collaborative and self-directed learning strategies to promote fluent EFL speakers. English Language Teaching, 10, 139-157. doi:10.5539/elt.v10n5p139. Bullock, S. M. (2013). Using digital technologies to support Self-Directed Learning of preservice teacher education. The Curriculum Journal, 24, 103-120. doi.org/10.1080/09585176. 2012.744695 Cetin, Y., Sozcu, O. F., & Kiniy, H. (2012). Incidental foreign language vocabulary acquisition from social network games. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 535-552.
  3. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis (12th ed.). Courier/Westford: Pearson Education Limited. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed). New York: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed). New York: Pearson Education. Cuhadar, C. & Yucel, M. (2010). Perceptions of Foreign language education pre-service teachers on educational use of information and communication technologies. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 27, 199-210.
  4. Du Toit-Brits, C. & Van Zyl, C. M. (2017). Self-directed learning characteristics: Making learning personal, empowering and successful. Africa Education Review, 14, 122-141. doi:10.1080/18146627.2016.1267576 Du, F. (2013). Students’ perspectives of self-directed language learning: Implications for teaching and research. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2). doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070224 Eksi, G. & Aydin, H. (2013). What are the students doing out there? An investigation of out-ofclass language learning activities. AIBU Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 191-210.
  5. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33. doi: 10.1177/074171369704800103 Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (10th ed.). USA: Pearson Education. Gibbons, M. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass/John Wiley & Sons. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., R