SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

The Experiences of Pre-service Science Teachers in Educational Content Development Using Web 2.0 Tools

Derya Orhan Göksun
Gülden Gürsoy
Pages
338–357
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, it was determined that pre-service teacherswere happy to participate in the implementation, recognized ways to integratetechnology in their fields, and had fun while developing content.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed to improve the experiences of pre-service science teachers incontent development using Web 2.0 tools and to determine the effects of theseexperiences on their self-efficacy beliefs in content development via Web 2.0 tools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the implementation, pre-service teachers developed content using Web 2.0tools such as Kahoot, Quizizz, Powtoon, Emaze, MindMeister and Toondoo and shared thecontent with the class using Edmodo. “Self-Efficacy Belief Scale on Fast ContentDevelopment via Web 2.0” was used as pre- and post-tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, it was determined that pre-service teacherswere happy to participate in the implementation, recognized ways to integratetechnology in their fields, and had fun while developing content.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study aimed to improve the experiences of pre-service science teachers incontent development using Web 2.0 tools and to determine the effects of theseexperiences on their self-efficacy beliefs in content development via Web 2.0 tools. Thepresent study was conducted with a mixed design that included empirical andphenomenological methods. Forty-two pre-service science teachers participated in thestudy. During the implementation, pre-service teachers developed content using Web 2.0tools such as Kahoot, Quizizz, Powtoon, Emaze, MindMeister and Toondoo and shared thecontent with the class using Edmodo. “Self-Efficacy Belief Scale on Fast ContentDevelopment via Web 2.0” was used as pre- and post-tests. Findings demonstrated thatpre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and all sub-dimensions of content developmentvia Web 2.0 tools improved as a result of the implementation. The views of them weregrouped under seven themes; prejudice, satisfaction, awareness, fun, infrastructureproblems, language problems and tool problems. Additionally, when the mean of itemresponses were examined, it was seen that the highest one was about preparingworksheet self-efficacy belief. Furthermore, it was determined that pre-service teacherswere happy to participate in the implementation, recognized ways to integratetechnology in their fields, and had fun while developing content.

🔖

Cite This Article

Göksun, D. O., Gürsoy, G. (2022). The Experiences of Pre-service Science Teachers in Educational Content Development Using Web 2.0 Tools. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 338–357. https://ajindex.com/articles/476588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamalari. Istanbul: İdeal Kultur Yayincilik. Arikan, Y. D. & Altun, E. (2007). Sinif ve okuloncesi ogretmen adaylarinin cevrimici odev sitelerini kullanimina yonelik bir arastirma. İlkogretim Online, 6(3), 366-376.
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122- 147. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2. ed). New York: Guilford. Birisci, S., Kul, U., Aksu, Z., Akaslan, D. & Celik, S. (2018). WEB 2.0 hizli icerik gelistirme ozyeterlik inanci belirlemeye yonelik olcek (W2OYİO) gelistirme calismasi. Egitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 8, 187-208. doi: 10.17943/etku.335164 Buchem, I. & Hamelmann, H. (2011). Developing 21st century skills: Web 2.0 in higher education: A case study. E-learning papers, (24). Retrieved on 27 March 2019 from https://issuu.com/gfbertini/docs/developing_21st_century_skills_-_web_2.0_in_higher
  3. Bush, L. & Hall, J. (2011). Transforming teaching with technology: Using web 2.0 tools to enhance on-line communication, collaboration, and creativity. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 3887-3890)
  4. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri (17. baski). Ankara:
  5. Pegem. Cakır, R. & Yildirim, S. (2009). What do computer teachers think about the factors affecting technology integration in schools. İlkogretim Online, 8(3), 952-964.
  6. Cresswell, J. W. (2017). Karma yontem arastirmalarina giris (Trans. Ed. M. Sozbilir). Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Dochy, F. & Segers, M. (2018). Creating impact through future learning: The high impact learning that lasts (HILL) model. London: Routledge. Domingo, M. G. & Gargante, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers' perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications' use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 21-28.
  8. Erdemir, N., Bakirci, H. & Eyduran, E. (2009). Ogretmen adaylarinin egitimde teknolojiyi kullanabilme ozguvenlerinin tespiti. Turk Fen Egitimi Dergisi, 6(3), 99-108.
  9. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E. & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher belief